Connect with us

Featured

NIH Withdrawals It’s Motion To Dismiss Lawsuit, Will Cooperate With FOIA Request

Published

1 year ago

on

The National Institutes of Health has withdrew it’s motion to dismiss a Freedom of Information lawsuit brought by Children’s Health Defense on Wednesday after the organization insisted on keeping hold of records pertaining to communications between NIH researchers and people who contacted the organization about their COVID-19 vaccine injuries.

In April, CHD filed a lawsuit against the NIH on the grounds that the organization had violated the Freedom of Information Act by failing to provide the requested documents nearly six months after the initial request and by keeping important information from the public.

Last month, NIH requested that the lawsuit be dismissed. However, the agency requested permission from the court on Wednesday to withdraw its motion to dismiss the case, stating that it “has determined that it will respond to Plaintiff’s FOIA request” and asking for an extension of time until August 4 to do so.

On Thursday, the judge granted NIH’s request.

Following CHD’s opposition

to the NIH’s motion to dismiss last week, which disputed the NIH’s assertions that the FOIA request was “broad and vague” and that it did not “reasonably describe” the requested records, the NIH then changed it’s mind.

The motion “ignores every fact that undercuts its arguments, as well as 25 pages of exhibits,” according to CHD’s filing, which claimed that NIH had cherry-picked portions of the FOIA request to support its case for dismissal.

The NIH was accused of “stonewalling” by Kim Mack Rosenberg, acting general counsel for CHD, because the organization had previously told CHD it had enough information to accommodate the request but never did. Instead, it stopped responding to CHD’s correspondence and later made “baseless claims” in court filings in an effort to have the case dismissed, according to Rosenberg.

CHD argued that its FOIA request was actually very specific in its opposition to NIH’s motion to dismiss. CHD had narrowed and specified its request through earlier back-and-forth correspondence with NIH, and it had given NIH a list of 10 individuals whose communications should be searched as well as a list of search terms to be used to locate the documents.

NIH responded that “since the filing of the motion to dismiss and after considering Plaintiff’s opposition,” the agency decided to fulfill the FOIA request rather than seeking to dismiss the lawsuit.

According to CHD’s lawsuit, numerous individuals with severe, ongoing health issues following the COVID-19 vaccination—including cardiovascular, neurological, and muscular problems—contacted NIH researchers in early 2021.

For testing, the NIH brought some of them in.

The NIH brought some of them in for testing and treatment, as reported in a Jan. 20, 2022, article in Science, and documented a portion of that work in a publicly available paper that detailed an observational study it carried out on 23 people reporting neuropathic symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination.

Several vaccine-injured people, including Brianne Dressen, founder of the React19 nonprofit that supports people with long-term COVID-19 vaccine injuries, also detailed their interactions with NIH to The Defender. They reported that NIH was initially responsive and investigated their injuries but later abruptly halted communication with them.

In response to a FOIA request from CHD, ten NIH researchers were asked to provide communications with people who contacted NIH about health issues they had after receiving COVID-19 injections.

All NIH call logs demonstrating communications with vaccine-injured people, all emails sent and received from them, and all internal communications between NIH researchers regarding any affected people were requested by CHD.

Related Topics:
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

2024 Race

Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer is set to testify in Kari Lake’s lawsuit to investigate fraudulent mail-in ballot signatures.

Published

10 months ago

on

September 21, 2023

By

Kari Lake’s trial in her lawsuit against Maricopa County is set to take place on September 25 and 26. Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer has been subpoenaed to testify and defend Maricopa County’s mail-in ballot procedures and their refusal to be transparent. The Recorder oversees mail-in voting operations, which were manipulated to steal the election from Lake. The trial will be held at 101 West Jefferson St., Phoenix, AZ 85003, in Courtroom 811 at 9:00am PT.

Lake has been fighting against the rigged 2022 election and her lawsuit for public 2022 voter signature records. This evidence will undoubtedly prove the election was rigged in Lake’s upcoming Appeals Court battle. Maricopa County contends that these records contain sensitive information, so they refuse to be transparent with elections. A ruling in a separate Yavapai County Court case confirmed that Maricopa County has been incorrectly defining “voter registration record” and unlawfully verifying mail-in ballot signatures.

The new Yavapai County Court ruling will require only voter registration forms to be used for signature verification, as opposed to previously accepted fraudulent mail-in ballots and other signature forms. Under the Arizona Elections Procedures Manual, when a signature is accepted on a mail-in ballot envelope or a voter uses an in-person polling place touch screen signature log, it is added to the voter’s “registration record” for future reference. Many voters were seen with similar affidavit signatures in consecutive elections that do not match other signatures on their voter registrations or past affidavits.

Arizona election integrity nonprofit We The People AZ Alliance was also in court for oral arguments in their public records lawsuit against Runbeck Election Services in Phoenix and Maricopa County. The Judge indicated he would issue a written ruling on Runbeck and Maricopa County’s Motion to Dismiss “shortly.”

The Gateway Pundit inspected hundreds of illegally verified 2022 mail-in ballot signatures and corresponding voter registration records in Maricopa County through a public records request and reported on the clear fraud involved. Stephen Richer, the Republican responsible for verifying these mail-in ballot signatures, will testify on the stand at trial and attempt to prevent Lake from accessing evidence of a fraudulent election.

Continue Reading

Featured

New Study Finds Trace Amounts of mRNA in Vaccinated Mothers’ Breastmilk

Published

10 months ago

on

September 21, 2023

By

A recently published peer-reviewed research study has raised significant concerns about breastmilk of vaccinated mothers being contaminated with mRNA.

The research, recently published in the prestigious Lancet medical journal, reveals that the administration of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to nursing women might result in the systematic transmission of the vaccine components to breast milk.

Researchers from New York University Grossman Long Island School of Medicine have found that breast milk was contaminated with mRNA up to 45 hours after vaccination in ten women they analyzed. This contradicts the official narrative from government agencies, politicians, and corporate media who believed mRNA was safe for breastfeeding mothers and their infants. Officials have insisted that mRNA shots do not travel throughout the body, but the study suggests that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA administered to lactating mothers can spread systematically to breast milk in the first two days after maternal vaccination. The study’s peer-reviewed paper was published in the October 2023 edition of the Lancet.

This is not the first study to make these findings, with traces of mRNA found in women’s breast milk in 2022. The authors of the Lancet paper continue to promote the vaccination of breastfeeding mothers, claiming that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines play a vital role in the fight against SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, they do not explain why mothers should take such a risk to be vaccinated against a virus with only mild symptoms.

The significance of this research extends beyond the scope of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, providing valuable insights into the transport and presence of vaccine mRNA in breast milk, which can be relevant for assessing the safety and efficacy of future mRNA-based therapies administered to lactating women.

SOURCE: LANCET STUDY

Continue Reading

2024 Race

Vivek Ramaswamy Blasts DOJ & FBI Over Owen Shroyer Sentence, Claims to Dismantle The FBI

Published

10 months ago

on

September 13, 2023

By

US presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy criticizes DOJ and FBI for sentencing Infowars host Owen Shroyer to 60 days in prison, threatening to use his presidency to pardon non-violent Jan 6 protesters and political prisoners.

“Yesterday a man by the name of Owen Shroyer was sentenced to prison for *speech*, not violence, on Jan 6 – for marching around the Capitol, using a bull horn, & shouting things like ‘1776!’ No violence. Didn’t enter the Capitol. That’s it,” said Ramaswamy Wednesday on X. “I don’t know the guy & I have no idea if he’s a ‘good person’ or not, but that’s not what our justice system is supposed to determine.”

The Republican presidential candidate announced plans to pardon non-violent Jan 6 protesters and political prisoners, citing the FBI’s ‘evidence’ used in their pursuit. He also announced a live-stream of a detailed plan to shut down the FBI and other federal agencies.

Continue Reading

Trending