Connect with us

Vaccine News

New Analysis in Florida Proves Covid Vaccines Did Not Save Lives



The benefits of the Covid injections are mainly reliant on a measure of the number of fatalities per case (now restricted to an assertion that they avoid severe disease and deaths – assertions that infections or transmission are decreased have been abandoned). Unfortunately, these data must be interpreted with a grain of salt because of irregularities in how “cases” are counted.

Furthermore, there is little historical information on how the number of cases of past respiratory viruses varied over time. For a third wave of an influenza variety, a disproportionately high number of cases per fatality may be the norm. Nobody is aware. All that is known is that each year, waves of hospitalizations and influenza-related mortality have traditionally had a similar size and duration.

Joel Smalley has analysed data from Florida and has broke it down by age group. Here are the death curves for the over-65s in Florida. It is a repeating pattern of several waves of similar size.

Figure 1: Deaths in Florida for over-65 year-olds. Total deaths (black line) over the baseline (dotted black line) at the top and Covid deaths (green) with the weekly excess deaths in grey bars.

Compared to waves in recent years caused by other respiratory viruses there were more deaths in these waves attributed to Covid.

People somehow bought into the myth that the decline starting in August 2020 was caused by lockdown and the decline beginning in January 2021 was caused by vaccinations. However, the same individuals agree that both the fall in August 2021 and the fall in January 2022 were natural occurrences. Those views are challenging to reconcile. The fact that the earlier peaks occurred at the same time of year as the later ones indicates that each wave experienced a natural peak. Given that the size and duration of these death waves are the same before and after injection, it becomes exceedingly difficult to discern any benefit from a vaccine. In order for the injections to have been 95% effective against death, the third wave is said to have been close to 20 times greater in the absence of immunization. That is a rather bold assertion.

Having established the impact Covid had in Florida on the more vulnerable over-65 year-olds we are ready to look at the impact on younger age groups. Here are 25-44 year-olds.

Figure 2: Deaths in Florida for 25-44 year-olds. Total deaths (black line) over the baseline (dotted black line) at the top and Covid deaths (green) with the weekly excess deaths in grey bars.

Covid barely affected this age group. There is a faint peak in July 2020 but none in January 2021 or January 2022. Instead, a rise from lockdown occurred, but it is a plateau rather than a wave. Then there is the shocking increase in deaths in the summer of 2021.

The official story is a combination of:

  1. There were more cases for Delta
  2. Delta was more deadly in the young
  3. It was the unvaccinated young who were dying

The first relies on case statistics, which are not a trustworthy indicator because they depend on testing rates, reporting rates, and the manner in which the testing is conducted. The second is predicated on the notion that a virus’s biology can be drastically altered by very little alterations. There is insufficient proof that these mutations have significantly altered either the pathology it causes or its transmissibility or deadliness. Comparing transmissibility over the duration of an entire wave, for instance, reveals that the proportion of contacts who contracted the disease was identical for each varian.

Omicron contained multiple spike protein mutations, which altered its pathology even though it was less lethal. There was no difference in the death rate by age group even with Omicron. Thirdly, many patients whose vaccination status was not recorded were assumed to be “unvaccinated,” the first two weeks following injection were labeled as “unvaccinated,” and the size of the unvaccinated population was underestimated. As a result, the claims that unvaccinated people were more likely to die were greatly skewed.

Importantly, by May 2021, nearly 30% of 25-44 year olds had been injected.

That is a huge proportion and you can bet it included all – or nearly all – of those who were at risk of dying from Covid.

Figure 3: The total percentage of each age group to have received an injection in Florida

So why did the young in Florida die, right at the time when they were being injected?

Florida immunized children at a time when there was a noticeable wave of Covid, in contrast to the U.K. Synthetic spike consumption keeps the immune system incredibly active. It is unable to fully perform its day work during that time. We are aware of this for a number of reasons.

First, Pfizer reported on the impact on one type of white blood cell in the first few weeks. After a week it had recovered but it certainly fell and we don’t know how low.

Figure 4: The count of the white blood cells, lymphocytes, in the blood in patients injected with the Pfizer product at different periods before and after vaccination. The left graph shows a molecule that was rejected for having too severe an effect. The others show the molecule used (central graph 18-55 year-olds and right hand side 65-85 year-olds). The measure at day 1-3 was still low and it is not clear how low it went before that measure.

There is other evidence of the impact, such as the high rates of shingles and the around 40% higher rates of Covid infection in the first two weeks after injection.

If the lack of Covid vaccine had really resulted in a significant increase in Delta wave deaths, then low vaccination countries would have seen extremely large Delta waves.

Take, for example, South Africa, where only 10% were injected by August 2021. The pre-Omicron waves were all of a similar magnitude. This was true for both Covid-labelled deaths and excess deaths.

Figure 5: Covid attributed deaths in South Africa
Figure 6: Excess deaths as percentage of baseline in South Africa

Palestine, which is comparable to Israel, would serve as another illustration. In both the pre- and post-vaccination eras, excess mortality waves in Palestine were greater, but over time, the waves within each nation were of comparable size. Only 20% of Palestinians have received injections by September 2021, compared to 64% of Israelis. As the Covid branded deaths had a comparable size regardless, the lower excess deaths in Israel are probably related to having experienced significant numbers of deaths earlier.

Figure 7: Covid labelled deaths in Israel and Palestine
Figure 8: Excess deaths as percentage of baseline in Palestine and Israel

Bahrain and Oman, two countries on the Arabian Peninsula that performed worse than others, might serve as another example. Both have received numerous vaccinations, but the timing was noticeably different. By the end of April 2021, Bahrain had immunized half its people. Oman had only vaccinated 7% of the population as of the beginning of June 2021, and it took until the middle of August to achieve 50%. With the introduction of the vaccination in May 2021, a sizable Delta wave surged in Bahrain but did not reach Oman until June. In the end, the delay in immunization in Oman until the summer had no negative effects. (There are no excess death statistics for Bahrain.)

Figure 9: Percentage of population vaccinated in Bahrain and Oman
Figure 10: Covid attributed deaths in Bahrain and Oman 
Figure 11: Cumulative covid attributed deaths in Bahrain and Oman

The claim that Covid vaccines saved lives does not stand up to any scrutiny.

Dr. Clare Craig is a diagnostic pathologist and co-Chair of the HART groupThis article was first published by HART.

Vaccine News

Tennessee Woman Fired for Refusing Employer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Wins Almost $700K



In a landmark decision, a federal jury has awarded Tanja Benton nearly $700,000 after she was terminated from her job at BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee (BCBST) for refusing to comply with the company’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The jury concluded that Benton’s refusal was grounded in her sincerely held religious beliefs.

Tanja Benton was employed by BCBST from 2005 until November 2022, serving primarily as a biostatistical research scientist. Her role, as outlined in her federal lawsuit, did not require regular in-person contact with clients or patients. In fact, Benton managed a portfolio of 10 to 12 clients annually, interacting with them infrequently and often not in person. With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Benton transitioned to working from home for approximately 18 months without any reported issues.

In response to the ongoing pandemic, BCBST implemented a company-wide COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Benton refused to comply, citing her belief that the vaccines were derived from aborted fetus cell lines, a claim that has been debunked. In her lawsuit, Benton expressed her conviction that receiving the vaccine would defile her body and dishonor God.

Benton requested a religious exemption from the vaccine mandate, which BCBST denied. The company insisted that no exceptions could be made for individuals with Benton’s job title and suggested she apply for a different position within the organization. Despite her appeals and arguments that her job did not involve direct interaction with people, BCBST ultimately terminated her employment.

Following her termination, Benton filed a federal lawsuit against BCBST. The jury found that Benton “proved by a preponderance of the evidence” that her refusal to get vaccinated was based on her sincerely held religious belief. The verdict awarded Benton $177,240 in back pay, $10,000 in compensatory damages, and $500,000 in punitive damages, totaling $687,240.

BCBST defended its vaccine mandate, stating, “The vaccine requirement was the best decision for the health and safety of our employees and members – some of whom are the most vulnerable in the state – and our communities. We appreciate our former employees’ service to our members and communities throughout their time with BlueCross.”

The jury’s decision in favor of Benton underscores the complex interplay between public health measures and individual religious beliefs. As companies navigate the evolving landscape of workplace safety and employee rights, this case serves as a significant precedent for handling vaccine mandates and religious exemptions.

Read the full settlement document below:

Continue Reading

Vaccine News

Kansas Sues Pfizer Over Alleged Consumer Protection Violations Related to COVID-19 Vaccine



Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach has filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, accusing the company of deceptive marketing practices regarding its COVID-19 vaccine. The lawsuit, lodged in state court in Thomas County, alleges that Pfizer marketed the vaccine as “safe” despite allegedly knowing it was associated with “serious adverse events.”

The legal challenge by Kansas follows a similar lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in November. At a news conference on Monday, Kobach revealed that Kansas is among several states pursuing legal action against Pfizer. The lawsuit contends that Pfizer misrepresented its COVID-19 vaccine as “safe and effective” while being aware of potential side effects, including myocarditis and pericarditis—heart inflammations that, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), rarely occur.

“In such an environment, it is imperative Kansans making that decision receive the truth,” Kobach stated, emphasizing the importance of transparency for individuals deciding whether to get vaccinated.

Pfizer has dismissed the lawsuit as baseless. In a statement, the company expressed pride in developing the COVID-19 vaccine swiftly during the global pandemic, claiming it saved countless lives. Pfizer emphasized that its communications about the vaccine have been accurate and science-based, and that patient safety remains its top priority.

“The representations made by Pfizer about its COVID-19 vaccine have been accurate and science-based. The company believes that the state’s case has no merit and will respond to the suit in due course,” Pfizer said.

The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer’s actions violated Kansas’ consumer protection laws, despite the fact that vaccine recipients did not pay for their doses directly. Kobach argues that consumer protection laws still apply and that Pfizer violated prior consent judgments with the state. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages, although it does not specify an amount.

Kobach, a Republican, is launching this legal challenge as the pandemic fades from public consciousness, but vaccine-related anger and conspiracy theories continue to circulate, particularly among some right-wing groups. The lawsuit underscores ongoing tensions and distrust surrounding the COVID-19 vaccines.

As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcome could have significant implications for pharmaceutical companies and their accountability in public health crises.


Continue Reading

Vaccine News

mRNA Covid Vaccine Aids Development of Cancer, New Study Finds



The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted global health, and the rapid development of mRNA vaccines emerged as a promising solution. However, despite the pandemic’s resolution, concerns remain regarding the potential dangers of 100% N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) modification found in these vaccines. Recent evidence suggests that mRNA vaccines – particularly those with a 100% m1Ψ modification – may inhibit essential immunological pathways, leading to a reduced immune response and potential increased susceptibility to recurrent infections. Moreover, findings imply that these modified mRNA vaccines could potentially aid in cancer development. This article explores the implications of these discoveries and provides recommendations for future clinical trials involving mRNA vaccines in both cancer and infectious disease treatments.


The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its subsequent COVID-19 disease turned the world upside down. The development of a vaccine became a top priority, leading to the rapid implementation of new technologies such as mRNA vaccines. These vaccines garnered significant attention and offered hope amid the pandemic, with the potential to prevent hospitalization and serious illness in those with comorbidities. However, recent studies have shed light on the effectiveness of these vaccines and their potential impact on cancer development, even in a post-pandemic world.

The m1Ψ-Modified mRNA Vaccines

mRNA vaccines work by introducing a small piece of the genetic material into the body, instructing cells to produce a harmless viral protein that triggers an immune response. This process enables the immune system to recognize and fight off the virus in the future. The novel aspect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is the inclusion of 100% m1Ψ modifications. This divergence from previous mRNA technologies and vaccines h as raised concerns.

In a melanoma model, it was discovered that adding 100% m1Ψ-modified mRNA to cancer cells stimulated cancer growth and metastasis. Non-modified mRNA vaccines had the opposite effect. This suggests that COVID-19 vaccines with 100% m1Ψ modification may potentially contribute to cancer development.

Implications and Recommendations

The rapid development and widespread use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated the potential of this technology in combating pandemics. However, several concerning findings and drawbacks have surfaced, warranting a reevaluation of the future of mRNA vaccines. The cumulative evidence highlights the need to halt the development of mRNA vaccines with 100% N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) modification for the sake of public health and safety.

Firstly, the waning immunity observed with mRNA vaccines raises concerns about their long-term efficacy. These vaccines do not generate sterilizing immunity, leaving individuals vulnerable to recurrent infections. Second, the impairment of essential immunological pathways due to the 100% m1Ψ modification may lead to a reduced immune response to viral infections and a potential increased risk of cancer development. Furthermore, recent studies have indicated that mRNA vaccines might have unpleasant and potentially long-lasting side effects on certain populations, such as those with a history of certain allergies.

Given these findings, it is crucial to reorient research efforts towards developing mRNA vaccines with lower percentages of m1Ψ modification. Utilizing alternative technology, like traditional protein-based vaccines, would provide a safer and more effective approach to prevent and control future infectious diseases. In conclusion, the potential dangers associated with the 100% m1Ψ modification in mRNA vaccines outweigh their benefits, and further development of these vaccines should be stopped to prioritize the health and well-being of the global population.


Continue Reading