Connect with us


CDC Reports confirm .6 Million American Children & Young Adults have died since the FDA approved the COVID-19 Vaccine



According to a shocking report leaked undercover by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC), COVID-19 vaccines, which were promoted as the cure for the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus, may actually be responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of children and young adults in the country.

According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Since the FDA authorized the COVID vaccines to be given to the American public for emergency use, a startling 608,590 children and young adults have perished.

Compared to 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic was at its worst and 43,938 excess deaths were reported, this shows a significant increase in the number of excess deaths among this age group.

But the U.S. is not the only country facing this issue.


According to an official report published by the UK Government’s Office for National Statistics, Children who have received the COVID-19 vaccine have a startling 4423% or 45 times greater risk of dying from any cause than unvaccinated children, and a 13,633% or 137 times greater risk of dying from COVID-19.


The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccinations have come under intense scrutiny as a result of these alarming findings.

Despite these alarming figures, the U.S. and UK governments have pushed for increased vaccination rates, even going so far as to give children as young as 5 years old in the UK and 6 months old in the USA emergency use authorization for the COVID-19 vaccine.


The data suggests that the vaccines may be to blame for the alarming rise in excess deaths, despite the fact that they were allegedly created to protect everyone from the alleged COVID-19 disease.

Many people are left wondering what could be causing this phenomenon in the wake of the recent report by the UK Government’s Office for National Statistics on the alarming increase in deaths among immunized children.

Neither of the reports go into detail about the precise causes of death, but a number of hypotheses have been advanced by medical professionals.

The adverse impact the COVID-19 vaccine may have on the heart is one of the most worrisome potential causes. Recent research has shown that the Covid-19 vaccines, especially in young people, can result in myocarditis, a condition that causes inflammation of the heart.

Myocarditis results in inflammation of the heart muscle, which could weaken and impair the heart’s ability to function. Chest pain, breathlessness, fatigue, and a rapid or irregular heartbeat are all signs of myocarditis.


Myocarditis can cause severe heart failure, cardiac arrest, and even death.

Although the precise cause of myocarditis following vaccination is still unknown, some experts think it might be caused by an immune response brought on by the vaccine that unintentionally attacks heart tissue.

The emergence of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), a strange and uncommon type of blood clotting disorder, is another explanation for the rise in deaths among children who have received vaccinations.

Many people who have received the COVID-19 vaccines from AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson have experienced this disorder, which is thought to be brought on by an immune reaction to the vaccine.

However, data from the U.S. CDC and the UK’s MHRA show that the conditions brought on by Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA gene therapy injections are the same.

Concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines’ potential long-term effects, particularly on children’s developing bodies and immune systems, have been voiced by some medical professionals. The vaccines might have unanticipated health effects on kids that haven’t been thoroughly investigated or understood.

Many governments and pharmaceutical firms continue to advocate for widespread vaccination despite these possible risks and worries, contending that the benefits outweigh the risks.

Recent research from the CDC in the United States and the UK Office for National Statistics suggests that this isn’t the case, particularly for children.

Many experts are now urging a re-evaluation of the risks and advantages of the COVID-19 vaccination for children in light of these findings. Given the low risk that COVID-19 poses to children, it is important to carefully balance the risks of serious adverse events against the potential benefits of vaccination, of which years of data now suggest there are none.


Pharmaceutical companies and governments continue to advocate for more vaccinations, maintaining that they are safe and effective despite the mounting evidence that the COVID-19 vaccination is unsafe.

The shocking reality has now been made public, but only time will be able to reveal what the future holds for the millions of kids and teenagers who have received these vaccinations.

The covid-19 vaccine kills kids and causes far more harm than good.



  1. Sarah Connor

    July 3, 2023 at 4:51 am

    My beautiful nephew died suddenly on the 29/10/22 from a massive heart attack at his Mother’s house.
    He was 26.
    My bosses husband had 4 cardiac arrests and is still here because of a defibrillator on the Ferry they were waiting for.
    Mt other bosses partner had a stroke.
    The handyman’s son has myocarditis now. My ex partners father died suddenly also.
    This is genocide.
    They should all hang from rope.

  2. TruthIsBest

    July 3, 2023 at 5:34 pm

    Authorized, not approved. Words matter, Patrick Webb.

  3. Hairstyles

    July 5, 2023 at 4:26 pm

    Good post. I study something tougher on totally different blogs everyday. It can all the time be stimulating to read content from other writers and apply a little one thing from their store. I抎 want to make use of some with the content material on my blog whether or not you don抰 mind. Natually I抣l provide you with a hyperlink in your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.

  4. Haircuts

    July 5, 2023 at 4:42 pm

    Thanks for any other great post. Where else may anybody get that type of information in such an ideal method of writing? I’ve a presentation next week, and I am at the look for such information.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


CIA Secret Report Reveals Warning to Russia of Terrorist Attack was Marked “Urgent” but Failed to Identify Target



US warning regarding a potential terrorist attack at a concert venue in Russia was labeled as “urgent.” However, the warning, according to Hersh’s source, did not specify Crocus City Hall as the target, despite some media reports suggesting otherwise.

The CIA allegedly provided the warning to Russian intelligence before the concert at the Crocus City Hall marking it “urgent,” meaning that the data in it “was credible and near term,” Hersh quoted the official as saying.

“The highly secret report on the attack in Moscow was prepared by the Counterterrorism Center at CIA headquarters and delivered to the terrorism division of the Russian Federal Security Service located in the old KGB building in Moscow. Separate briefings were presented in person by the FBI officer at the embassy. This is an established relationship,” the official said.

The warning, however, did not mention Crocus City Hall near Moscow and only said that an attack was being planned at some “public gathering,” according to the official.

The information provided by the official is contrary to a Washington Post report published on Tuesday claiming that Crocus City Hall was specifically identified in the warning as the target of a terrorist attack.

On March 22, several armed men broke into Crocus City Hall, a major concert venue just outside Moscow, and started shooting at people. They also started a fire in one of the auditoriums, which was full of people ahead of a concert. The attack left 695 casualties, including 144 dead, according to the latest data from the Russian Emergencies Ministry.

The four main suspects in the case — all of them citizens of Tajikistan — tried to flee the scene in a car but were detained and charged with terrorism. Russian authorities believe the perpetrators planned to flee to Ukraine, where a safe haven had been arranged for them. An investigation is underway.

Later in March, The New York Times reported, citing European and US security officials, that the US intelligence agencies did not provide the Russian side with all the information they had about the threat of a terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall in the Moscow Region out of fear that Russian authorities might learn about their intelligence sources or methods of work.

Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Director Alexander Bortnikov also said that the information transmitted by the United States on the preparation of a terrorist attack was of a general nature, and the Russian special services responded to it.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Biden Admin is Using Fraudulent Climate Dataset in Push For Green Agenda, According to Government Watchdog




A government watchdog group has filed a complaint with the Biden administration over its use of a dataset frequently used to push its climate agenda.

Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT) filed the complaint with the Commerce Department over the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) “Billions Project” dataset, which purports to keep track of natural [and climate] disasters that have caused at least $1 billion in damages going back to 1980. The billion-dollar disasters (BDD) data — cited frequently by the Biden administration to insinuate that climate change is intensifying and justify sweeping green policies — is based on opaque data derived from questionable accounting practices, PPT alleges in the complaint.

“American families and businesses continue to struggle with persistently high inflation, which many attribute in large part to the energy policies and government spending of the current administration. The idea that blatant violations of scientific integrity could be underlying the rationale for these policies should concern every American,” Michael Chamberlain, PPT’s director, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Unfortunately, this is far from an isolated incident. The Biden Administration came into office pledging that its decision making would be grounded in the highest-quality science, but all too often has failed to live up to those promises.”

The complaint was filed with the Commerce Department, as NOAA operates under its auspices, Chamberlain told the DCNF.

PPT’s complaint alleges that NOAA does not adequately disclose its sources and methods for compiling the BDD dataset, adds and removes BDD events from the dataset without providing its rationale for doing so and produces cost estimates that are sometimes significantly different than those generated by more conventional accounting procedures.

While NOAA states that it develops its BDD data from more than a dozen sources, the agency does not disclose those sources for specific events or show how it calculates loss estimates from those sources, PPT’s complaint alleges.

The complaint further alleges that NOAA’s accounting methods are opaque and “produce suspect results.”

For example, when Hurricane Id alia took aim at Florida in 2023, NOAA initially projected that the storm would cause about $2.5 billion worth of damages before insured losses ultimately came in at about $310 million, according to PPT’s complaint, which cites the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation

 for that figure. Nevertheless, NOAA subsequently marked up its estimate for how much damage the storm caused to $3.5 billion, a discrepancy for which NOAA provided no explanation, PPT alleges in its complaint.

NOAA researchers have disclosed in the past that the agency considers factors such as functions pertaining to livestock feeding costs — in addition to more conventional types of damages — in their cost calculations.

Further, the complaint alleges that BDD events are quietly added and removed from the dataset without explanation, citing Roger Pielke Jr., a former academic who believes climate change to be a real threat but opposes politicized science. In a forthcoming paper analyzing the merits of BDD statistics, Pielke compared the dataset in late 2022 to the dataset in the middle of 2023 and found that ten new BDD events were added to the list and 3 were subtracted without explanation.

Apart from the issues with methodology alleged by PPT in its complaint, the use of BDD events as a proxy for climate change’s intensity is inherently misleading because economic data does not reflect changes in meteorological conditions, as Pielke has previously explained to the DCNF.

For example, increasing concentrations of assets, especially in coastal areas, can confound the usefulness of BDD events as an indicator for the intensity of climate change, as Energy and Environment Legal Institute Senior Policy Fellow Steve Milloy has previously explained to the DCNF. Hypothetically, the same exact hurricane could hit the same exact place, decades apart, with vastly different damage totals; this would be the case because there are simply more assets sitting in the way of the storm, not because the storm was any more violent due to worsening climate change.

NOAA has acknowledged this limitation of the dataset in prior communications with the DCNF.

Additionally, NOAA will add disasters to the list retrospectively because it adjusts for inflation, meaning that a hurricane that caused $800 million in damages in 1980 dollars would be added to the list because the damages exceed $1 billion when adjusted for inflation, for example.

The Biden administration has frequently cited the BDD dataset to substantiate its massive climate agenda.

For example, Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk cited the dataset in written testimony submitted to lawmakers in February explaining the White House’s decision to pause new approvals for liquefied natural gas export terminals.

The BDD statistics are also referenced Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), the Biden administration’s landmark climate report that is intended to provide the most sound scientific basis for lawmakers and officials to craft climate policy.

NOAA asserted that the increasing frequency of BDD events is a sign of intensifying climate change in a January press release and blog post summarizing 2023, and then defended the use of the dataset in subsequent communications with the DCNF.

“Sensational climate claims made without proper scientific basis and spread by government officials threaten the public’s trust in its scientific officials and undermines the government’s mission of stewarding the environment,” PPT’s complaint states. “It also poses the danger of policymakers basing consequential government policy on unscientific claims unsupported by evidence.”

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

U.S. Military Has Started Recalling Retirees Due to Recruiting Crisis




The U.S. Army Publishing Directorate released the ALARACT 017/2024, titled, “Utilization of the Army Retiree Recall Program.”

The document cites Executive Order 13223 from the Bush administration in 2001.

A retiree recall is a “retired Soldier who is ordered to active duty (AD) from the Retired Reserve or the retired list under 10 USC 688/688a, 12301(a), or 12301(d). Per AR 601-10, Recalled retiree Soldiers must be aligned to a valid vacant AC requirement that matches the grade and skill of the retiree before he or she may be recalled to AD,” according to the document. “The retiree population will be utilized as a last resort to fill Active Component vacant requirements.”

The ALARACT 017/2024 comes as the U.S. military is experiencing a recruitment crisis.

The U.S. Army recently announced that it is cutting thousands of positions. Authorized troop levels will now be an estimated 470,000 by fiscal year 2029, down 24,000 from its 494,000 soldiers.

“While making these investments and adding formations, the Army must also reduce force structure to protect readiness in light of decreased end strength. The Army is currently significantly over-structured, meaning there are not enough soldiers to fill out existing units and organizations. Army leaders seek to have at least 470,000 soldiers in the Active Component by FY29, which is nearly 20,000 above the current end strength but a reduction of about 24,000 authorizations compared to currently planned force structure,” the report


It added that the Army is “undertaking a similarly important transformation of its recruiting enterprise so that it can man units sufficiently, continue to bring the right types and amounts of new talent into the Army, and rebuild its overall end strength.” Noting the ongoing recruitment failure within the U.S. military, the document noted, “The Army must solve its recruiting challenges to successfully transform for the future.”

Continue Reading