Connect with us


The Gates Foundation Gave $9.5 Million to UW-Madison in Research Grants Aimed at Modifying H5N1 Viruses



The Gates Foundation awarded $9.5 million to the University of Wisconsin-Madison and principal investigator Yoshihiro Kawaoka for research aimed at modifying H5N1 viruses. The goal of the project is to alter the viruses to preferentially recognize human-type receptors and transmit efficiently in mammals. This research, though intended for scientific advancement, has sparked significant controversy and concern.

The grant from the Gates Foundation was also allocated to a collaborative project between Yoshihiro Kawaoka and Ron Fouchier. Fouchier, who previously modified H5N1 to become airborne transmissible in ferrets at the Erasmus Medical Center, worked alongside Kawaoka to provide the two additional mutations necessary in Egyptian H5N1 viruses to create variants with the mammalian “transmissibility features” identified in Kawaoka’s study.

This project has raised alarm among experts and the public alike. Critics argue that the research funded by the Gates Foundation involves activities that could be likened to bioterrorism. By providing detailed blueprints on how to create more transmissible and potentially deadly variants of H5N1, the research could be misused by bad actors to develop biological weapons.

Yoshihiro Kawaoka’s work has been at the forefront of influenza research for years. His studies have aimed to understand the mechanisms of viral transmission and pathogenicity better, which could inform vaccine development and pandemic preparedness. However, the nature of his research, especially when it involves increasing the transmissibility of already dangerous viruses, has always been contentious.

Ron Fouchier’s involvement adds another layer of controversy. His past work in making H5N1 airborne transmissible in ferrets was met with widespread concern, leading to debates on the ethics and risks of gain-of-function research—experiments that increase the virulence or transmissibility of pathogens.

The concern is that while the research is conducted under controlled conditions and with the intent of scientific advancement, the knowledge gained could be misused. The detailed understanding of how to make H5N1 more transmissible in mammals could theoretically enable the creation of a bioweapon if such information fell into the wrong hands.

In response to these concerns, the scientific community and funding bodies have been urged to balance the benefits of such research with the potential risks. There have been calls for increased oversight, transparency, and international cooperation to ensure that dual-use research—studies with both beneficial and harmful potential—is conducted responsibly.

The Gates Foundation has a long history of funding scientific research aimed at improving global health. However, this instance highlights the complex ethical landscape that accompanies cutting-edge biological research. As advancements in biotechnology continue to accelerate, the need for robust ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks becomes ever more critical.

The implications of this research funding are far-reaching. It underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue between scientists, ethicists, policymakers, and the public to navigate the delicate balance between scientific progress and global security.



House Committee Report finds former Fauci-led department concealed plans to create a mutant monkeypox virus in 2015



A recent report by the House Energy and Commerce Committee has alleged that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) misled Congress regarding its plans to create a more transmissible and lethal strain of monkeypox (Mpox) during Dr. Anthony Fauci’s tenure as head of the agency. The report, released after an 18-month investigation, suggests that the NIAID, along with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), obstructed and provided false information to the committee.

Background on the Controversial Research

In 2015, the NIAID proposed experiments to engineer a more dangerous strain of Mpox by combining genes from two different clades of the virus. This research aimed to understand how different genetic factors could increase the virus’s lethality and transmissibility, potentially aiding in the development of better treatments and vaccines. However, this proposal only gained widespread attention in late 2022, against the backdrop of ongoing concerns about the origins of COVID-19 and the role of gain-of-function (GOF) research.

Findings of the House Committee

The committee’s report claims that the NIAID and its parent agencies repeatedly asserted that these risky experiments had not been “formally proposed” or conducted, and were not under consideration. However, the report states these claims were false and that documents eventually provided under subpoena threats confirmed the experiments had been approved.

The report concludes that the NIAID cannot be trusted to oversee its own research on pathogens, citing a failure to adequately assess the biosafety risks and public health threats posed by such experiments. This has led to recommendations for establishing an independent oversight board to review NIAID-funded research on dangerous pathogens and shifting the final approval for GOF research to a different entity.

Reactions and Implications

Dr. Fauci, who recently testified regarding the origins of COVID-19, has consistently denied that his agency was involved in GOF experiments in China. The lack of transparency around the Mpox research, however, has raised questions about the reliability of statements made by the HHS, NIH, and NIAID.

Proponents of the research, including NIAID scientist Dr. Bernard Moss, argue that the experiments aimed to swap natural mutations rather than create new ones, thus not enhancing the virus’s pathogenicity. Nevertheless, experts like Dr. Richard Ebright, a microbiologist at Rutgers University, have warned that such a modified virus could pose an exceptionally high risk to the public if accidentally released.

The controversy over the NIAID’s Mpox research has also reignited broader concerns about GOF research, which involves manipulating viruses to understand their potential to cause pandemics. Critics argue that the benefits of such research do not justify the risks, especially given the fears that similar practices may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Current Status and Future Actions

The House committee is seeking additional evidence to confirm that the risky Mpox experiments were never actually conducted, despite claims from researchers that the work was never carried out. The committee’s findings have prompted calls for greater oversight and transparency in pathogen research funded by federal agencies.

In the meantime, the global Mpox outbreak, which began in 2022, continues to be monitored. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports that as of January 2024, there have been 32,000 cases in the US and 58 deaths, with a global total of 95,900 cases since the outbreak’s onset.

The ongoing scrutiny of pathogen research practices highlights the need for robust safety protocols and transparent communication between scientific agencies and legislative bodies to prevent potential public health crises.

Continue Reading


RFK Jr. Alleges Reason Why Fauci is Not in Prison For Covid Pandemic Debacle



In a recent podcast episode featuring independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Fox News host Glenn Beck, discussions pivoted to the COVID-19 pandemic and the roles of various public figures, including Dr. Anthony Fauci. Kennedy expressed his frustration with the U.S. government’s pandemic response, suggesting that Fauci’s actions should have led to legal consequences.

Kennedy’s criticism of Fauci stems from the latter’s prominent role in both the Trump and Biden administrations’ COVID-19 responses. Kennedy argued that Fauci’s recommendations, such as lockdowns and business closures, were detrimental, particularly to small businesses. He also questioned Fauci’s advice regarding masking and vaccination, alleging inconsistency and inadequacy.

The conversation extended to broader societal impacts of pandemic measures, with Kennedy highlighting concerns about child abuse reports and the effects of lockdowns on children’s well-being. He criticized what he perceives as a failure of the medical profession and advocated for alternative COVID treatments, mentioning ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, despite medical consensus against their efficacy.

Kennedy’s stance reflects his broader political views and dissatisfaction with both major parties. As an independent candidate, he seeks to challenge the status quo and offer an alternative to voters disenchanted with traditional party politics.

While Kennedy’s candidacy has garnered attention, opinions vary on its potential impact on the electoral landscape. With efforts underway to secure ballot access nationwide, the upcoming election cycle remains uncertain, with polling data reflecting mixed sentiments regarding Kennedy’s influence on the presidential race.

As discussions surrounding the pandemic and public health continue, Kennedy’s perspectives add to the ongoing dialogue about governance, crisis management, and individual freedoms in times of uncertainty.

Continue Reading


Leaked Emails Reveal That Fauci-led Wuhan Lab Tried Hiding ‘Purposeful Human Manipulation’ in Gain-of-Function Research



Judicial Watch has disclosed the receipt of 5 pages of documents from the FBI, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. These records, dated April 2020, reveal an email exchange among officials at the FBI’s Newark Field Office discussing Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. The correspondence mentions “gain-of-function research,” a term indicating the manipulation of viruses to increase their transmissibility or virulence.

In particular, the email exchange highlights concerns over the NIAID grant’s involvement in gain-of-function research, which, according to one email, could be conducted in a manner that “would leave no signatures of purposeful human manipulation.” This raises questions about the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and the potential role of such research in its development.

Judicial Watch’s FOIA request aimed to uncover the FBI’s investigation into the Fauci agency’s gain-of-function grants following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. The documents shed light on the FBI’s awareness of the nature of the research funded by the NIAID, indicating a need for further scrutiny into the matter.

In addition to this revelation, Judicial Watch’s ongoing FOIA lawsuits and investigations have uncovered various aspects of Covid-19 controversies. These include communications between government officials and social media platforms regarding the censorship of Covid-related content, as well as records related to vaccine development, testing, and adverse effects.

Overall, these findings underscore the importance of transparency and accountability in understanding the origins of the pandemic and addressing public health concerns effectively. Judicial Watch continues to pursue its investigations to ensure that vital information reaches the public domain.


Continue Reading