Connect with us

Most Popular

Secret Documents Reveal Pfizer, FDA & Fact Checkers lied About Toxic Graphene Oxide Inside the Covid-19 Vaccines



A relatively new substance that is still poorly understood is graphene oxide. But what is certain is that it can be toxic to the body’s cells and tissues, according to studies. Additional research has revealed that graphene oxide is toxic to blood cells, causing oxidative stress and inflammation.

This is why it’s alarming to learn that Graphene Oxide (GO), which is connected to the COVID-19 vaccines created by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, has been in and out of the news for the past two years.

Doctors and scientists have independently verified that Graphene Oxide is in fact present in these vaccines through a number of studies. However, these claims have been refuted by the manufacturers, drug regulators, and so-called fact-checkers, likely as a result of the known toxic effects it has on the body.

For instance, in a fact-check article published on July 23, 2021, Reuters, which effectively feeds news to the entire Western world without most people realizing it, claimed that it is impossible for the Covid vaccines to contain graphene oxide because they would be either dark brown or black in color instead of the clear or yellowish color they are.

However, Reuter’s Fact Checkers neglected to mention that it is entirely feasible to create a clear or yellowish liquid when Graphene Oxide is combined with other ingredients, such as Sucrose, a listed ingredient of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

However, at the time this article was being written, Reuters did not have access to a document that the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) had to publish in February 2023 as per a US Federal Court order.

A document that was submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to gain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

A document that confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

The Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is an injection of genetic material known as mRNA that enters your body’s cells and instructs them to produce the Spike (S) protein that is allegedly present on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

A multi-step manufacturing process, including the creation and purification of messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules as well as the formulation and packaging of the vaccine, is required to create this extremely complex “vaccine.”

And according to Pfizer, it is required during the manufacturing process of its Covid-19 vaccine. But we only know this thanks to a U.S. Federal Court Judge ordering the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) to publish all the documents that Pfizer submitted to gain Emergency Use Authorization.

For those who don’t know, the Covid-19 injections had not completed phase 3 and 4 trials, so could not be fully approved in December 2020. Instead, they had to be authorized for emergency use only. This is why it’s criminal that they extended the EUA to children, considering they are at little to no risk of suffering anything more severe than the common cold if infected with the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.

The documents would not have been made public for 75 years if the Federal Court Judge had not ordered the FDA to do so. mainly because the FDA asked for this amount of time to publish the documents under the Freedom of Information Act.

However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA to compel the release of millions of documents pertaining to the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine’s Emergency Use Authorization.

Federal Judge Mark Pittman also mandated that the FDA release 55,000 pages per month beginning in early January 2022, and PHMPT has since posted all of the documents as they have been made available on its website.

Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.

The study’s goal was to “express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2,” according to the document, which Pfizer conducted between April 7 and August 19, 2020.

In simple terms, the study was done to find out how the vaccine functions. According to the study, your cells were given instructions by the vaccine to produce a protein called P2 S, which is the Spike protein of the purported Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most concerning about the study is the confirmation on page 7 that Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –

Source – Page 7

Consequently, a variety of factors during the manufacturing process could possibly introduce contaminants or foreign materials into the vaccine. This obviously includes the potential for different concentrations of graphene oxide (GO) to end up in the final item.

The use of raw materials or reagents that contain the toxic substance or other graphene-based materials could be one potential source of Graphene Oxide contamination.

For instance, if Graphene Oxide is present in the manufacturing process as a contaminant in one of the reagents, this could potentially introduce it into the vaccine.

Similar to this, improper cleaning or validation of the manufacturing equipment could result in contamination of the vaccine with graphene oxide.

Filters and other items that are used to sterilize or purify the vaccine could also be a source of Graphene Oxide contamination.

Although these materials are intended to eliminate impurities and foreign substances, if they are not properly designed or validated, they may introduce Graphene Oxide into the vaccine.

In October 2021, The Expose team published an investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). They found that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines several times.


At the time, as you can see from the above chart, just 4% of the batches of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine produced were responsible for every single death reported to the CDC as being due to Pfizer Covid-19 vaccination.

Could it be that these batches of the Pfizer vaccine had a yellowish color and therefore a higher concentration of Graphene Oxide?

Because just a few months prior, Reuters published a fact check that claimed the Covid-19 vaccines do not contain Graphene Oxide, and provided the following explanation as to why –


But Reuters “forgot” to mention something important about sucrose and how its presence in the Pfizer vaccine could result in a transparent or slightly yellowish liquid when combined with Graphene Oxide.

Sucrose is a type of sugar that is commonly used in food and pharmaceutical products as a stabilizer and preservative. In the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, sucrose allegedly helps to maintain the stability and efficacy of the mRNA molecules in the vaccine.

When mixed with Graphene Oxide it can produce a transparent or yellowish liquid depending on the amount of Graphene Oxide present.

But it’s also possible that other officially listed ingredients of the Pfizer vaccine – lipids, potassium chloride, monobasic potassium phosphate, sodium chloride, dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate – could produce a transparent/yellowish liquid when combined with Grahene Oxide.

It all depends on on the concentration of Graphene Oxide and the interactions between the different components.

This is a concerning fact considering many mainstream news sources in the UK and USA rely on Reuters for their news content.

The BBC, The Guardian, The Times, The Daily Telegraph, and The Independent are some of the major UK news organizations that use Reuters content.

Many news organizations in the USA, including CNN, ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, Fox News, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Wall Street Journal, use Reuters content.

This proves that Reuters effectively controlls the mainstream news in the West and that they are willing to lie to you.

However, the fact that the mainstream media mislead you should be the least of your concerns if you decided to get the Covid-19 vaccine or not.

Because it has been demonstrated in numerous studies that graphene oxide (GO) can be absorbed by cells and tissues in the body, there is a serious worry that it may over time accumulate in specific organs or tissues.

Here are just a few examples of such studies:

  • In a study published in the journal Nature Nanotechnology in 2014, researchers injected mice with GO and found that it accumulated in the lungs, liver, and spleen. The study also found that the accumulation of GO caused damage to the mice’s lungs and immune systems.
  • In another study published in the journal ACS Nano in 2016, researchers exposed human lung cells to GO and found that the GO was taken up by blood cells and caused oxidative stress and inflammation.
  • A review article published in the journal Nano Today in 2017 summarized the findings of several studies on the toxicity of GO. The article noted that GO can be taken up by cells and tissues in the body and has been shown to accumulate in the lungs, liver, spleen, and kidneys. The article also noted that the toxicity of GO appears to be dependent on several factors, including the size, shape, and surface chemistry of the Graphene Oxide.

The study published in the journal ACD Nano in 2016 is of particular concern when we look at the findings of a study conducted by Dr. Philippe van Welbergen of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in which he concluded Graphene Oxide was being transmitted from the COVID vaccinated to the unvaccinated, destroying red blood cells & causing strange blood Clots.

At the beginning of July 2021Dr. Philippe, was interviewed on a South African community channel, Loving Life TV.   He explained that when his patients started complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory issues, even sometimes paralysis and late onset of heavy menstruation (women in their 60s upwards), he took blood samples.

Their blood contained numerous damaged cells, strange tube-like structures, and luminescent particles. There weren’t many visible healthy cells. He had never seen these patterns in blood prior to three months earlier. These tubes-like structures are now recognized as graphene.

Since then, Dr. Philippe has been a regular guest on Loving Life TV: blowing the whistle on the experimental Covid injection roll-out; providing updates on the increasing damage being done to blood by the experimental Covid injections over time; and, giving updates on the Covid situation in the UK and South Africa.

On 12 February 2022, Dr. Philippe returned again to Loving Life TV to release images of his latest slides of blood samples.  The live stream was lengthy so Loving Life TV separated it into two parts.

Part One is a discussion including answers to the audience’s questions.

In Part Two, Dr. Philippe presents the images of his latest blood slides and explains what the images are showing.  He discusses nearly 100 blood slides from both “vaccinated” and vaccine-free patients.  His slides show that vaccine-free patients have been “infected with vaccine toxins through shedding.”

Below is a short clip from Part Two courtesy of The Timeline Post channel on Telegram.

Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.

The next image is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid drug. The blood is coagulated, the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together.  The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres.  You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells.

A couple of weeks before the video below was made, Dr. Philippe began noticing a magnetic or electrical polarity effect on different sides of the graphene fibres.  In the image below, to the right of the fibre the cells are coagulated and on the left-hand side is what looks like a gap or roughly backwards “C” shaped spacing.  Dr. Philippe says that this “behaviour” was not seen before but now, all of a sudden, it is being seen in almost every sample.  It is an indication that “these things have changed, their reaction with surrounding blood cells has changed … and I don’t know what triggered it,” he said.

The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child.  It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child.

Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection.  The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly.

Dr. Philippe’s presentation is truly eye opening and horrifying – a must watch, especially for those who proclaim Covid injections are “safe” and continue to insist people should “get vaccinated”.

Because it is evidence the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines not only contain Graphene Oxide, but that the Graphene Oxide is also being transmitted from the COVID vaccinated to the unvaccinated, destroying red blood cells & causing strange blood Clots in both.

Left image: Healthy blood shows cells able to move around separately; they have good motility and will not cause thrombosis
Right image: “These strands or tubes appear to be hollow – it’s really odd. When you really expand it, you can see some cells in it but we don’t know if it’s a crystalline structure or organic. The few healthy cells are circled. The rest are cracked and fractured – they’re finished. That’s not healthy blood. We see it again and again,” Dr. van Welbergen

In conclusion, we have now proven that Graphene Oxide makes its way into the Covid-19 injections through the manufacturing process.

We have also proven that the Covid-19 vaccine manufacturers, medicine regulators, mainstream media, and so-called Fact-Checkers have continuously lied to you.

And we have, unfortunately, proven that Graphene Oxide is toxic to humans and is shed from the Covid vaccinated to the unvaccinated.

In the wake of these shocking revelations, you may now find yourself grappling with a crisis of trust.

The once-respected medical institutions and manufacturers, who have been entrusted with safeguarding public health, now stand exposed for concealing the truth about the presence of Graphene Oxide in the Covid-19 vaccines.

The full consequences of this deception are yet to be known, but it will most definitely force more individuals to question not only the safety of the vaccines, but also the very institutions they have long relied upon.

If the truth of the confidential Pfizer document published by the FDA by order of the U.S. Federal Court, spreads like wildfire, millions around the globe might finally demand accountability and justice for those who have suffered the toxic effects of Graphene Oxide since the Covid-19 injections were granted Emergency Use Authorization.



  1. Pingback: Secret Docs: Pfizer, FDA, ‘Fact-Checkers’ LIED About Deadly Graphene Oxide in COVID Jabs – TAKIN' IT BACK

  2. Pingback: Secret Docs: Pfizer, FDA, 'Fact-Checkers' LIED About Deadly Graphene Oxide in COVID Jabs - National File

  3. Pingback: Secret Docs: Pfizer, FDA, ‘Fact-Checkers’ LIED About Deadly Graphene Oxide in COVID Jabs – NewDYRTO

  4. Shirley Gallagher

    July 9, 2023 at 7:42 pm

    My son was forced through i hi is job to get it and my now 17 yr. Sold granddaughter through her high school to play basketball. I pray everyday for them, my son is sick a lot and I’m scared. I don’t want to lose my only son, after losing my oldest 2 yrs. ago through suicide.

    • alice hesselrode

      July 16, 2023 at 9:22 am

      I will pray as well Shirley. I can not imagine your sorrow.

  5. Pingback: Secret Documents Reveal Pfizer, FDA & Fact Checkers lied About Toxic Graphene Oxide Inside the Covid-19 Vaccines - HopeGirl Blog

  6. Dalit

    July 16, 2023 at 9:15 am

    “Ray” once said that most of humanity are dumbs and that is so correct because even now
    most of them do not care at all..

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

2024 Race

Supreme Court Signals Potential Reversal of Colorado Trump Ballot Decision



In a pivotal session on Thursday, the majority of Supreme Court justices hinted at their inclination to overturn a Colorado ruling that prevented former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state’s Republican presidential primary ballot.

Trump, 77, alongside his legal team, sought an appeal against Colorado’s Supreme Court decision from December 19. The ruling had declared Trump ineligible for the March 5 Republican primary, citing his violation of the Constitution’s “Insurrection Clause” during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Trump’s legal representatives put forth multiple arguments during the oral proceedings. They contended that Congress, rather than individual states, held the responsibility to enforce the clause. Moreover, they denied Trump’s involvement in an insurrection, asserting that seeking to remain in office after his 2020 election defeat did not constitute such an act.

Chief Justice John Roberts expressed concerns about the potential ramifications of upholding the Colorado ruling. He apprehensively highlighted the risk of states arbitrarily removing politicians from opposing parties from the ballot, which could significantly impact presidential elections.

Amidst the legal deliberations, liberal Justice Elena Kagan raised the fundamental question of why one state should possess the authority to determine the eligibility of a presidential candidate.

Justice Samuel Alito presented a hypothetical scenario questioning the administration’s decisions regarding foreign policy, emphasizing the complexities surrounding diplomatic relationships, particularly referencing the Obama-Biden era’s policy towards Iran.

The crux of the matter lies in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, which explicitly bars individuals engaged in insurrection or rebellion from holding office under the United States. This clause also grants Congress the power to lift such disqualifications and reinstate violators onto the ballot.

Notably, some of Trump’s congressional allies proposed legislation to formally declare his non-involvement in the Capitol riot, thereby paving the way for his inclusion on the ballot.

Throughout the proceedings, Justice Sonia Sotomayor appeared skeptical of arguments favoring Congress as the primary enforcer of the clause. She underscored the constitutional requirement of a two-thirds majority for disqualification removal, juxtaposing it with Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell’s indication of a simple majority.

In response to inquiries from various justices, Mitchell emphasized Trump’s assertion of presidential immunity and rejected the characterization of the Capitol incident as an insurrection, labeling it a riot instead.

The debate also touched upon whether the presidency falls under the purview of the disqualification clause, with Mitchell arguing against its inclusion.

Attorney Jason Murray, representing Colorado voters seeking Trump’s removal from the ballot, emphasized the absence of a rational basis for creating a special exemption to the clause tailored to Trump.

As the legal discourse unfolds, the Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision holds significant implications, not only for Trump’s candidacy but also for the broader interpretation of constitutional provisions governing presidential eligibility.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

NEW STUDY: Disposable COVID-19 Mask Wearing Link to Cancer




According to a study posted by the National Institutes of Health earlier this year, indicates that the tight-fitting masks may expose users to dangerous levels of toxic chemicals.

The journal Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety as well as the NIH website both provided details of the research.

Scientists from Jeonbuk National University in South Korea examined reusable fabric masks as well as two other disposable medical-grade mask types for the research. The results revealed that the chemicals produced by the medical-grade masks had at least eight times the advised safety limit of toxic volatile organic compounds (TVOCs), according to the experts.

According to the data, breathing in TVOCs may cause headaches and nausea. Organ damage and cancer are also linked to prolonged and repetitive exposure.

The researchers cautioned that further research is necessary to fully understand the VOCs connected to surgical mask usage and their impacts on human health.

They continued by saying that there are measures to lessen the risk. If you open a mask and let it rest for at least 30 minutes before using it, exposure may be greatly decreased.

This suggests that the quantity of potentially dangerous compounds in surgical masks may be related to how they are packaged.

Disposable masks contain high levels of TVOCs

A study conducted by researchers tested 14 disposable and cloth masks, KFAD and KF94, made from thermoplastics polypropylene and polyurethane nylon, in South Korea and the United States. The results showed that the masks contained up to 14 times the TVOCs detected in cotton masks.

The sample with the highest amount of TVOCs had 4,808 cubic meters per microgram, which is about 4.8 parts per million, more than eight times the recommended limit. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends keeping TVOC levels below 0.5 parts per million in indoor air.

The researchers also identified two chemicals linked to liver and reproductive damage: dimethylacetamide (DMAc) and dimethylformamide (DMF). The study acknowledges that the sample size was small and did not test several other popular disposable masks like KN95s.

The researchers also referenced earlier research indicating that mask mandates could cause more harm than good. The study’s findings could have new relevance as COVID-19 variant BA.2.86 is spreading throughout the United States. However, new studies highlighting the dangers of face masks could make mask mandates ineffective.

How to reduce exposure to TVOCS

TVOCs are a large group of odorous chemicals and many of them are released by cleaning and beauty products, burning fuel and cooking.

Sources of TVOCs in the home include:

  • Aerosol sprays
  • Air fresheners
  • Automotive products
  • Cleansers and disinfectants
  • Moth repellents

Other sources of TVOCs include:

  • Building materials and furnishings
  • Craft materials, such as glues and adhesives
  • Office equipment, such as carbonless copy paper, copiers and printers, permanent markers and correction fluids

The American Lung Association (ALA) warned that TVOCs may irritate the eyes, nose and throat; cause difficulty breathing and nausea; and damage the central nervous system and organs like the liver.

Some TVOCs are also considered human carcinogens, meaning they can cause cancer.

To reduce exposure to TVOCs or volatile organic compounds (VOCs), you must inspect your home for the common sources of TVOCs and VOCs.

Source control:

  • Eliminate the number of products in your home that give off TVOCs.
  • Only buy what you need if you are working on something that requires adhesive, caulks, paints and solvents. Unused chemicals stored in the home may “leak” and release VOCs into the air.
  • Store unused chemicals in a garage or shed where people rarely visit.
  • Dispose of all unused chemicals that are stored in your home or garage. Check with your city or county for the nearest household hazardous waste collection sites.
  • Look for low-VOC options if you need paints and furnishing.

Ventilation and temperature control:

  • Increase the amount of fresh air in your home to help reduce the concentration of VOCs indoors.
  • Increase ventilation naturally by opening doors and windows. Fans can help maximize air brought in from the outside.
  • Keep both the temperature and relative humidity as low as possible. Chemicals off-gas more in high temperatures and humidity.
  • Schedule home renovations when your home is unoccupied or during seasons that will allow you to open doors and windows to increase ventilation.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

BOMBSHELL: FBI Lied To Delaware U.S. Attorney About Key Details in Biden Corruption Case




According to documents obtained from the FBI and Department of Justice reveal that the agencies blatantly lied about Rudy Giuliani, a partisan lawyer working for then-President Donald Trump, misleading Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss into believing that all allegations against Hunter Biden came from Giuliani. Weiss was charged with prosecuting Hunter Biden for tax and fraud crimes. By doing this, the FBI concealed information from a whistleblower who accused President Joe Biden of receiving a bribe from Ukrainian authorities in order to assist his son with international business. The whistleblower’s interview was recorded.

Internal emails uncovered by The Federalist demonstrate that information concerning the Hunter Biden affair leaked from the FBI and was first supplied to the New York Times showed that Giuliani’s discovery of Hunter’s notorious laptop and the beginning of the sole inquiry into Hunter. One month after the 2020 election, the FBI Office of Public Affairs National Press Office released the NYT’s report, “Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of Hunter Biden,” to Weiss’ Baltimore office.

Together, the emails made public raise concerns about whether Attorney Weiss was properly informed about a secret source previously questioned by the FBI who claimed to have information showing that Biden accepted a $5 million bribe while serving as vice president in exchange for pressuring the Ukrainian government to dismiss a prosecutor looking into Hunter’s employer, Burisma Energy, for corruption.

The testimony was recorded by FBI agents as part of their interview with the source and was included on an FD-1023 form that was initially withheld from congressional Republicans who wanted to link President Biden to any possible criminal behavior by his troubled son. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has already blasted the DOJ for destroying 17 audio recordings that may have implicated Biden. Weiss then heard from another source that the FBI had verified the claims provided by the anonymous person.

Weiss would have known that the confidential source claimed to have spoken with Burisma executive Mykola Zlochevsky, who allegedly told the source that he was forced into paying Biden and Hunter $5 million each in exchange for their assistance in getting prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired. Had Weiss received timely information from the FBI’s FD-1023 form, he would have known that.

50 former U.S. intelligence officers joined forces with Biden officials during the 2020 campaign to assert that Hunter’s accusations of impropriety were a product of “Russian disinformation” meant to harm the reputation of then-candidate Biden. Two years after becoming president, Biden has watched as his son was accused of many offenses, and he is still negotiating conditions for a new plea agreement with Weiss’s office. Republicans in the House are debating whether to impeach President Biden, citing the FBI’s withholding evidence among other things.

Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss was falsely told that all allegations against Hunter Biden originated from Rudy Giuliani, a partisan attorney working for then-President Donald Trump. The FBI withheld a documented interview by a whistleblower who accused President Joe Biden of accepting a bribe from Ukrainian officials to help his son conduct overseas business. Internal emails obtained by The Federalist show that leaks from the FBI about the Hunter Biden scandal, originally sent to the New York Times, suggested the only investigation began with Giuliani and the discovery of Hunter’s infamous laptop. The FBI Office of Public Affairs National Press Office leaked the story to Weiss’ Baltimore office one month after the 2020 election.

The chain of disclosed emails raises questions about whether Attorney Weiss was appropriately notified about a confidential source previously interviewed by the FBI who claimed to have evidence that Biden as vice president accepted a $5 million bribe in exchange for pressuring the government of Ukraine to fire a prosecutor investigating Hunter’s employer, Burisma Energy, for corruption. The FBI documented the testimony in an FD-1023 form that was originally withheld from congressional Republicans seeking to tie President Biden to potential criminal activity by his embattled son.

Continue Reading