Researchers from South Korea have just presented compelling proof that the #DiedSuddenly phenomenon is real. The study examined young adults under 45 who died suddenly from myocarditis brought on by mRNA. Seven deaths occurred within three days of the injections, but none were connected before autopsies.
The Korean researchers weren’t the only ones either. Even more convincing proof that the mRNAs caused thousands of sudden or very quick deaths from cardiovascular catastrophes in people under 50 comes from two earlier, previously unreported studies.
Although both studies were published in reputable, peer-reviewed journals months ago, little attention has been paid to them. Both studies were carried out outside of the United States, which is not surprising given that concerns about the dangers of mRNA for academic researchers there are almost nonexistent.
In the first study, the associate director of the Tokyo Medical Examiner’s Office oversaw a group of pathologists who performed 54 autopsies on adults who had passed away within seven days of receiving the Covid vaccine.
Although they strictly evaluated causality, they still discovered a potential connection between the mRNAs and seven of the deaths, including a massive cerebral hemorrhage in a 52-year-old man with no other significant medical issues.
In other words, the pathologists discovered that the shots may have been a factor in about one in every eight post-jab deaths they investigated.
The fact that two out of the three deaths in people under the age of 40 had myocarditis as the underlying cause of death—likely brought on by mRNA jabs—was even more startling. (The pathologists said it was unclear whether the third under-40 case’s cardiac inflammation was related.)
“The Japanese death investigation system needs to be reinforced to adequately evaluate causal relationships between death and vaccination,” the researchers wrote in the paper, which was published in the November 2022 edition of Legal Medicine.
(Here a lymphocyte, there a lymphocyte, everywhere a lymphocyte…)
In the second paper, although receiving even less attention and has only been cited once since it was published in January, it is even more impressive. Researchers in Qatar examined each of the 138 deaths that took place there within 30 days of receiving the Covid vaccine between January 2021 and June 2022.
The Qataris used medical record reviews, a less time-consuming method of determining causation, whereas the Japanese researchers had carried out complete autopsies. However, the Qatari researchers discovered numerous apparent mRNA deaths, just like the Japanese pathologists had.
The researchers identified 23 of the deaths as having a high or intermediate probability of being vaccine-caused using very strict criteria and only including deaths that occurred within 15 days of vaccination. All 23 were cardiac arrests or sudden cardiac deaths. Almost all of them happened to people under 50.
The risk of sudden death within 15 days of vaccination administration was 1 in 100,000 for the 2.3 million people in Qatar who received vaccinations.
48 of the deaths could be categorized as having a “high” or “intermediate” probability of being vaccine-caused, according to the results of a second review that the researchers conducted using somewhat less stringent criteria.
Nearly a third of all deaths within 30 days of vaccination were represented by those 48 deaths. This number also suggests that, in addition to any other risks the shots may pose, a risk of sudden cardiac death of up to 1 in 50,000 healthy young adults may also exist.
This results in thousands of unexpected deaths from mRNAs within a matter of weeks in individuals who are at virtually no risk of Covid.
—
(Can’t make an mRNA omelette without a few high-probability deaths in people under 40!)
—
But even raising these issues infuriates vaccine advocates. Alex Borenson even saw their anger first hand last December when he questioned whether mRNAs might have driven the death last December of Grant Wahl. Wahl’s death was without question worthy of scrutiny.
He was a prominent soccer journalist who had mocked unvaccinated people. His wife, Dr. Celine Gounder, is an infectious disease specialist who advocated and continues to press strongly for the mRNAs.
—
(Grant Wahl, Dec. 17, 2021. What’s worse than being hospitalized?)
Gounder said later that Wahl had died of an aortic aneurysm, a rupture in the artery that carries blood from the heart. The explanation raised as many questions as it answered, since the mRNAs are linked to vascular problems that raise the risk of aneurysms.
—
Yet questioning the story around Wahl’s death aroused fury in vaccine advocates. Gounder even wrote a New York Times opinion piece a month after his death decrying anyone who questioned whether “Covid vaccination was a risk factor” for Wahl’s death.
Unfortunately, trying to shout down those of us with serious questions about the risks – especially the cardiovascular risks – of the mRNAs does nothing to reduce them.
It only raises even more concerns for anyone who has noticed the reality of #DiedSuddenly.
In a disturbing twist to last week’s targeted violence against Minnesota officials, sources reveal that a conspiratorial letter left behind by shooting suspect Vance Boelter accuses Governor Tim Walz of orchestrating a political assassination plot. The letter, addressed to the FBI, allegedly claims Walz instructed Boelter to kill U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar so that Walz could seek her Senate seat—a position he has not expressed any intent to pursue.
Two individuals with direct knowledge of the letter described it as incoherent, one and a half pages long, and filled with paranoid ramblings. The letter allegedly outlines unsubstantiated claims that Boelter was trained “off the books” by the U.S. military, and that Walz had enlisted him to assassinate Klobuchar and potentially other politicians, including a veiled reference to Sen. Tina Smith.
Federal prosecutors say Boelter left the letter in a Buick abandoned near his home in Green Isle, Minnesota. It is believed to include a confession to the killings of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, as well as the shootings of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette.
Boelter, 57, now faces federal charges including:
Two counts of stalking Rep. Hortman and Sen. Hoffman using interstate facilities;
Two counts of murder in the deaths of the Hortmans;
Two counts of firearm use in the shootings of the Hortmans and Hoffmans.
While federal authorities declined to comment on the letter’s contents, local officials addressed the severity of the situation. Hennepin County Attorney’s Office spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping stated they could not comment on an open investigation, but added, “We have seen no evidence that the allegations regarding Governor Walz are based in fact.”
Gov. Walz’s spokesman, Teddy Tschann, called the events “deeply disturbing for all Minnesotans” and praised law enforcement and prosecutors for their swift actions.
Sen. Klobuchar issued a strong response, saying, “Boelter is a very dangerous man and I am deeply grateful that law enforcement got him behind bars before he killed other people.”
Documents obtained by the Minnesota Star Tribune also reveal that Boelter held a valid carry license as recently as 2020, issued while he was still affiliated with his family’s private security firm.
With more details likely to surface as the investigation unfolds, the letter marks a chilling insight into Boelter’s delusions—and highlights the growing threats facing public officials.
A new study from the MIT Media Lab has raised concerns about the long-term effects of using artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT on human cognition. The research, released this month, suggests that relying on large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT could impair an individual’s critical thinking abilities, especially with prolonged use.
Researchers observed participants over several months as they completed SAT-style essay assignments. The subjects were divided into three groups: one using ChatGPT, another using Google’s search engine, and a third group relying solely on their own thinking—dubbed the “brain-only” group.
To analyze brain activity during the writing tasks, researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor neural engagement across different regions of the brain. The results showed a stark difference in cognitive involvement among the groups.
According to the study, those using ChatGPT demonstrated the lowest level of brain engagement. Over time, these participants began to rely more heavily on the AI, eventually moving from asking structural questions to simply copying and pasting complete essays. The researchers noted that this group “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.”
Participants who used Google showed moderate brain activity, while the “brain-only” group displayed the strongest and most widespread neural activity, indicating deeper cognitive involvement throughout the writing process.
The study’s lead author, Nataliya Kosmyna, emphasized the urgency of the findings, particularly as AI tools become more integrated into education.
“What really motivated me to put it out now before waiting for a full peer review is that I am afraid in 6–8 months, there will be some policymaker who decides, ‘let’s do GPT kindergarten.’ I think that would be absolutely bad and detrimental,” Kosmyna told Time
magazine. “Developing brains are at the highest risk.”
The study highlights growing concerns among educators about how easily accessible AI tools are enabling academic dishonesty and changing how students learn. Despite these concerns, AI integration in classrooms appears to be accelerating.
In April, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order promoting the use of AI in American schools. The policy aims to prepare young students for a future economy shaped by AI advancements.
“The basic idea of this executive order is to ensure that we properly train the workforce of the future by ensuring that school children, young Americans, are adequately trained in AI tools, so that they can be competitive in the economy years from now into the future, as AI becomes a bigger and bigger deal,” White House staff secretary Will Scharf said at the time.
As the debate over AI’s role in education continues, this new research may fuel broader discussions on how to balance technological innovation with cognitive development—especially for younger generations.
SACRAMENTO, CA — Former Los Angeles Mayor and current California gubernatorial candidate Antonio Villaraigosa has publicly alleged that Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra were involved in concealing former President Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline during his time in office.
Villaraigosa, a Democrat, made the claim amid a heated California gubernatorial race. Becerra, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, is also a candidate, while speculation continues over a potential Harris bid. The race comes as current Governor Gavin Newsom reaches the end of his second and final term, per California’s two-term limit.
In a statement referencing recent reporting and excerpts from the book Original Sin, Villaraigosa stated:
“What I’ve seen in news coverage and excerpts from the new book ‘Original Sin’ is deeply troubling. At the highest levels of our government, those in power were intentionally complicit or told outright lies in a systematic cover up to keep Joe Biden’s mental decline from the public.”
Both Harris and Becerra previously served as California Attorney General. Villaraigosa emphasized their past leadership roles, stating:
“Now, we have come to learn this cover up includes two prominent California politicians who served as California Attorney General – one who is running for Governor and another who is thinking about running for Governor.”
He added:
“Those who were complicit in the cover up should take responsibility for the part they played in this debacle, hold themselves accountable, and apologize to the American people. I call on Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra to do just that – and make themselves available to voters and the free press because there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.”
Becerra responded in a statement, saying:
“It’s clear the President was getting older, but he made the mission clear: run the largest health agency in the world, expand care to millions more Americans than ever before, negotiate down the cost of prescription drugs, and pull us out of a world-wide pandemic. And we delivered.”
Kamala Harris has not issued a public response. Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to the offices of Harris and the Bidens but had not received a reply at the time of publication.
The allegations come as discussions about Biden’s cognitive and physical health continue. Earlier this month, during an appearance on The View, Biden dismissed claims of cognitive decline during his presidency.
In related developments, Biden’s personal office recently confirmed that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a high Gleason score and metastasis to the bone.
Villaraigosa’s comments are the latest in a growing list of concerns raised within the Democratic Party about leadership transparency and accountability in the final years of the Biden administration.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login