Connect with us

Plandemic

Leaked Emails Reveal That Fauci-led Wuhan Lab Tried Hiding ‘Purposeful Human Manipulation’ in Gain-of-Function Research

Published

on

Judicial Watch has disclosed the receipt of 5 pages of documents from the FBI, obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. These records, dated April 2020, reveal an email exchange among officials at the FBI’s Newark Field Office discussing Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. The correspondence mentions “gain-of-function research,” a term indicating the manipulation of viruses to increase their transmissibility or virulence.

In particular, the email exchange highlights concerns over the NIAID grant’s involvement in gain-of-function research, which, according to one email, could be conducted in a manner that “would leave no signatures of purposeful human manipulation.” This raises questions about the origins of the coronavirus pandemic and the potential role of such research in its development.

Judicial Watch’s FOIA request aimed to uncover the FBI’s investigation into the Fauci agency’s gain-of-function grants following the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic. The documents shed light on the FBI’s awareness of the nature of the research funded by the NIAID, indicating a need for further scrutiny into the matter.

In addition to this revelation, Judicial Watch’s ongoing FOIA lawsuits and investigations have uncovered various aspects of Covid-19 controversies. These include communications between government officials and social media platforms regarding the censorship of Covid-related content, as well as records related to vaccine development, testing, and adverse effects.

Overall, these findings underscore the importance of transparency and accountability in understanding the origins of the pandemic and addressing public health concerns effectively. Judicial Watch continues to pursue its investigations to ensure that vital information reaches the public domain.

SOURCE: JUDICIAL WATCH

Plandemic

RFK Jr. Alleges Reason Why Fauci is Not in Prison For Covid Pandemic Debacle

Published

on

In a recent podcast episode featuring independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Fox News host Glenn Beck, discussions pivoted to the COVID-19 pandemic and the roles of various public figures, including Dr. Anthony Fauci. Kennedy expressed his frustration with the U.S. government’s pandemic response, suggesting that Fauci’s actions should have led to legal consequences.

Kennedy’s criticism of Fauci stems from the latter’s prominent role in both the Trump and Biden administrations’ COVID-19 responses. Kennedy argued that Fauci’s recommendations, such as lockdowns and business closures, were detrimental, particularly to small businesses. He also questioned Fauci’s advice regarding masking and vaccination, alleging inconsistency and inadequacy.

The conversation extended to broader societal impacts of pandemic measures, with Kennedy highlighting concerns about child abuse reports and the effects of lockdowns on children’s well-being. He criticized what he perceives as a failure of the medical profession and advocated for alternative COVID treatments, mentioning ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, despite medical consensus against their efficacy.

Kennedy’s stance reflects his broader political views and dissatisfaction with both major parties. As an independent candidate, he seeks to challenge the status quo and offer an alternative to voters disenchanted with traditional party politics.

While Kennedy’s candidacy has garnered attention, opinions vary on its potential impact on the electoral landscape. With efforts underway to secure ballot access nationwide, the upcoming election cycle remains uncertain, with polling data reflecting mixed sentiments regarding Kennedy’s influence on the presidential race.

As discussions surrounding the pandemic and public health continue, Kennedy’s perspectives add to the ongoing dialogue about governance, crisis management, and individual freedoms in times of uncertainty.

Continue Reading

Plandemic

New CDC guidelines announced Friday, say to treat Covid like the Flu

Published

on

By

In a significant shift, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released updated guidelines on Friday, signaling a shift in the handling of Covid cases. The new guidance marks another step towards the normalization of the virus, which has dramatically impacted lives worldwide for the past four years.

According to the latest CDC recommendations, individuals diagnosed with Covid no longer need to isolate for a mandatory five-day period. Instead, they should adhere to a set of precautions similar to those commonly practiced with the flu. This includes staying home until experiencing a day without fever and seeing improvement in symptoms.

The move essentially is telling what most of us already knew, to treat Covid more like the flu, and not overreact when ill. While Covid remains a serious public health concern, the latest guidance acknowledges that it is no longer the singular disruptor it once was. Instead, it has become another infectious disease that individuals and communities must manage alongside existing health threats.

Under the updated guidelines, individuals should continue taking precautions, such as wearing masks and limiting close contact with others, for the subsequent five days following symptom improvement. This approach aims to strike a balance between preventing the spread of the virus and allowing individuals to resume normal activities as soon as possible.

The CDC’s revised recommendations reflect evolving scientific understanding of Covid transmission and immunity, as well as the need to adapt public health strategies to the changing landscape of the pandemic. As vaccination rates rise and new variants emerge, health authorities continue to reassess and refine their guidance to best protect public health.

SOURCE: CDC

Continue Reading

Plandemic

NYC firefighter forced to retire after COVID “vaccine” injury is suing city for disability benefits

Published

on

By

A New York City fireman who was disabled after taking the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” which he was obliged to take in order to maintain his work is suing the city for damages, including enhanced disability compensation.

O’Brian Pastrana, a 35-year-old NYC firefighter, has suffered permanent health damage due to the COVID-19 jabs required by citywide mandates. His lawyer claims that the city is in denial about the incident, which he believes is part of a “disturbing pattern of deliberate cruelty” towards the vaccine-injured and those who spoke out against the mandates. In June, the Fire Pension Fund’s Board of Trustees denied Pastrana’s request for more substantial disability benefits, after the New York City Fire Department (FDNY) Board of Health concluded that Pastrana did indeed suffer a heart injury from the injection.

Pastrana now lives off about half his regular salary, a major pay cut, and wants to increase that amount to at least equal what he was receiving previously before being forced to get injected as a condition of continued employment. He received his first dose of one of the mRNA (modRNA) COVID injections on Oct. 29, 2021, and suffered an immediate anaphylactic response, including hives, swelling of the lips, and other horrific symptoms that persisted for weeks.

Pastrana had to be treated in an emergency room for these symptoms and later seen by an FDNY doctor who diagnosed him as having suffered from a COVID injection side effect. He was then diagnosed with myocarditis and determined to be in the throes of heart failure.

In March, an FDNY doctor took Pastrana off full duty and recommended that he retire. He was offered the minimal “ordinary disability retirement,” despite there being higher tiers of disability benefits available, which pays out just 50 percent of his $92,000 salary, minus taxes. Pastrana’s attorney believes his client should be medically and legally eligible for “accidental disability benefits,” which are usually awarded when a firefighter suffers an accidental injury.

Continue Reading

Trending