Connect with us


House GOP Finds Proof Joe Biden Is Guilty



Emails discovered by House Republicans demonstrate “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that Joe Biden exploited his position as vice president to shield his son. (Watch Below Video):

Below is the letter he sent to NARA:

“The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating President Biden’s meetings and communications with certain family members and their business associates during his tenure as Vice President. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has published the Biden Vice Presidential Records Collection, which contains information relevant to the Committee’s work. 

“Many of these records have been redacted for publication pursuant to the Presidential Records Act (PRA) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). 

“To further our investigation, it is essential that the Committee review these documents in their original format.

“The Committee seeks unrestricted special access under the PRA to Case Number 2023-0022-F, entitled “Email Messages To and/or From Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden related to Burisma and Ukraine,” which has been published on NARA’s website. These records have been redacted for public release pursuant to the PRA and FOIA. 

“For example, an email bearing the subject “Friday Schedule Card,” is withheld in part under a “P6” and “b(6)” restrictions, denoting personal information regarding the subject under the PRA and FOIA respectively.  

“Attached to this email, and made available on the NARA website, is a document that indicates on 9:00 a.m. on May 27, 2016, Vice President Biden took a call with the president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. It is concerning to the Committee, however, that this document was sent to “Robert L. Peters”—a pseudonym the Committee has identified as then Vice-President Biden. 

“Additionally, the Committee questions why the then-Vice President’s son, Hunter Biden—and only Hunter Biden—was copied on this email to then-Vice President Biden.

“To further our investigation, the Committee needs to review these documents in their original format. The Committee also requests access to certain other documents and information described below. Please provide these documents no later than August 31, 2023:

“Complete, underacted versions of all documents from Case Number 2023-0022-F; 

“Any document or communication in which a pseudonym for Vice President Joe Biden was included either as a sender, recipient, copied or was included in the contents of the document or communication, including but not limited to Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware;

“Any document or communication in which Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, or Devon Archer was included either as a sender, recipient, copied, or was included in the contents of the document or communication; and

“All drafts from November 1, 2015 to December 9, 2015 of then-Vice President Biden’s speech delivered to the Ukrainian Rada on December 9, 2015.

“Special access to presidential records may be granted “to…Congress” and “to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, to any committee… if such records contain information that is needed for the conduct of its business and that is not otherwise available….” 

“Furthermore, the PRA subjects Vice-Presidential records to its provisions “in the same manner as Presidential records.”

“The Committee’s need for these Vice-Presidential records is specific and well-documented. The Committee seeks to craft legislative solutions aimed at deficiencies it has identified in the current legal framework regarding ethics laws and disclosure of financial interests related to the immediate family members of Vice Presidents and Presidents—deficiencies that may place American national security and interests at risk. 

“The Committee is concerned that foreign nationals have sought access and influence by engaging in lucrative business relationships with high-profile political figures’ immediate family members, including members of the Biden family. For additional information regarding the Committee’s legislative purpose regarding its investigation of the Biden family’s international business, the Committee would direct you to three bank records memoranda it has released this year,” he wrote.



  1. Sid S

    August 20, 2023 at 5:03 pm

    Oh, nothing to see here. Let’s indict Trump again and his entire family, including 17 year old Baron. And then, all of his friends and his lawyers.
    Speaking of his lawyers, let’s intimidate them and their firms so that Trump and everyone associated with him CAN’t GET QUALITY representation!

    • XEP

      August 20, 2023 at 6:48 pm

      This is a dumb comment but I don’t care what happens to Trump or any of the.

      • Peter Noyes

        August 20, 2023 at 8:15 pm

        You are the problem. Even if you and I don’t care about Trump or any one near him, what happens when the shoes on the other foot and they say they don’t care what happens to us?

        • Papi

          August 21, 2023 at 3:49 pm

          So..let him walk? Follow the law like everyone else. He’s guilty AF This is nothing new.

      • Peter N

        August 20, 2023 at 8:17 pm

        You are the problem. Even if you and I don’t care about Trump or any one near him, what happens when the shoes on the other foot and they say they don’t care what happens to us?

    • BenOVerbich

      August 21, 2023 at 2:06 am

      Trump can’t get quality representation because he consistently screws over his attorneys and doesn’t pay them. He’s indicted because he committed criminal acts. Come on now, this is simple stuff that even small children can see and understand; and has nothing to do with what Joe Biden is or isn’t doing.

      • Bennie Andrew Rollins

        August 21, 2023 at 4:48 am

        They manufactured charges that were designed to make Trump look guilty in an attempt to discredit him.
        The “Presidential Document Act” states that the President may take any documents that he chooses.
        He told the J-6 people to peacefully protest. Pelosi’s people incited the attack, that they covered up, including the pipe bombs.
        Asking about corrupt election isn’t a crime.
        And alternate electorate is legal.

        All fake charges to make him look bad

        Why? He is going to stop all the shit that goes on in Congress like the bidens got caught doing
        Do your research

        • BenOVerbich

          August 21, 2023 at 5:20 am

          Pretty bold to say, “do your research” when you have such a loose grasp of reality. Unfortunately, your version of events is the trumptard moron version, with no basis in reality. Nobody cares that much about discrediting trump, he did it himself a long time ago. I think you mean the Presidential Records Act and that does allow him to declare certain documents as personal, prior to removing them. Not months after being caught with government documents and lying about them repeatedly and not classified defense documents that he didn’t bother to declassify when he had the opportunity. He absolutely did not recommend the J6 mob that he fired up peacefully protest and he refused to say anything to calm them down until hours after he basked in the destruction they were causing. Asking about what he believed to be a corrupt election is not a crime, the numerous actions he took and committed others to without any actual evidence, was criminal. Fake charges aren’t necessary to make him look bad, he’s done that for himself his whole life. And what exactly do you believe he’s going to stop that he didn’t even make a dent in the first four years he had the opportunity. You’re diluted and even small children can see through the nonsense you’re trying to buy into.

          • john

            August 21, 2023 at 6:17 am

            Your wasting your time buddy. People like this can’t hear you.
            They’ve been brainwashed by all the disinformation on NewsMax & others like it.
            I’ve got a buddy in MT. I rode out to see him this summer. I was there 3 days.
            Every night he plops down in front of the TV & watches this garbage & believes every word. He truly believes NewsMax is the most reliable source of information he can find.
            What do you do . . .
            It’s like a disease~

          • Karen

            August 21, 2023 at 10:21 am

            Lol . Your funny. And blind !!!! You come on now how about it? Lol o

      • Karen

        August 21, 2023 at 10:16 am

        Lol . Your funny. And blind !!!! You come on now how about it? Lol

        • BenOVerbich

          August 21, 2023 at 10:57 am

          Was that supposed to be a complete thought or some sort of coherent response to my comment? Because, it is neither. It reads like typical trump-speak jibberish that makes a vague insult as if you have some useful rebuttal, but the useful part just never materializes. This is how school children talk as well. Your ignorance is glowing, your orange messiah would be proud!

    • Janice

      August 21, 2023 at 10:23 am

      Dumb Ass. All Trump Hater but love the Sleazy Crime Family Biden.
      Vote him back in you WOKERS.

      For Me……. I’m still researching candidates. I’m a Conservative Republican
      But even considering Robert Kennedy…. So all you WOKERS just keep
      Focusing on Pres. Trump, like you have since before he was elected.
      Never seen a Party soo scared. Just hope Country goes Conservative.

      • BenOVerbich

        August 21, 2023 at 11:21 am

        You make an awful lot of assumptions based on nothing at all except that if someone dare disagree with the great Trumplethinskin, they must be a Dem, Biden loving, communist, “worker”. Guess what Trumptard? There’s a lot of lifelong republican, conservative citizens out here who have chosen to maintain their integrity and keep some basic values and, in turn, are disgusted by the moral less, habitual liar Donald Trump. Being repulsed by his countless inexcusable behaviors doesn’t make us any less conservative. It just means we have some self respect and refuse to be represented by a criminal moron.

  2. Greg

    August 21, 2023 at 7:27 am

    Ok so why hasn’t impeachment happened yesterday?

  3. Michael P Brown

    August 21, 2023 at 1:34 pm

    And your point is . They got a lot of documents texts and Emails among many other things of proof do something or give it up it’s gotten very old

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


Hamas wants written guarantee from U.S. for permanent ceasefire in hostage deal



Hamas is demanding written guarantees from the United States for a permanent ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip as conditions to agree to a US-backed Israeli truce and hostage deal proposal, according to two Egyptian security sources.

The mediation efforts led by Qatar and Egypt revealed on Tuesday that Hamas had responded to the phased ceasefire plan, which aims to end the eight-month conflict between Israel and Hamas, though specific details were not disclosed.

This plan, publicized by US President Joe Biden in late May, outlines a gradual process. It includes the phased release of Israeli hostages held in Gaza, the withdrawal of Israeli forces, the release of Palestinian prisoners, and the reconstruction of Gaza, along with the return of the remains of deceased hostages in a third phase.

While the United States has indicated that Israel has accepted the proposal, Israel has not made any public statements confirming this.

Sources familiar with the negotiations revealed that Hamas is concerned about the lack of explicit guarantees regarding the transition between the phases of the plan. The initial phase involves a six-week truce and the release of some hostages, while the second phase includes a permanent ceasefire and the withdrawal of Israeli forces.

The Egyptian sources stated that Hamas would only agree to the plan if these guarantees are provided, and Egypt is currently in discussions with the US to address this demand.

“Hamas wants reassurances of an automatic transition from one phase to another as per the agreement laid out by President Biden,” a third source with knowledge of the talks said.

Neither Hamas nor Egyptian authorities have responded to requests for comment.

When announcing the plan, President Biden mentioned that if negotiations for the second phase took longer than six weeks, the ceasefire would continue until those negotiations concluded.

Hamas described its response to the proposal as “positive,” suggesting it opened a “wide pathway” towards reaching an agreement.

However, an Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity, claimed that Hamas had “changed all of the main and most meaningful parameters,” essentially rejecting Biden’s proposal for the hostage release.

A non-Israeli official briefed on the matter, who also requested anonymity, mentioned that Hamas had proposed a new timeline for a permanent ceasefire with Israel and the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza, including Rafah.

The evolving dynamics of these negotiations underscore the complexity of achieving a lasting resolution to the conflict, with both sides seeking assurances and conditions that align with their respective interests and security concerns.


Continue Reading

Government Accountability

FBI Memo Exposes Political Bias in Security Clearance Reviews Targeting Trump Supporters, Vaccine Hesitancy, and 2nd Amendment Advocates



Newly obtained FBI memos reveal that agency officials conducting a top-secret security clearance review for a longtime employee asked witnesses whether that employee was known to support former President Donald Trump, if he had expressed concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine, or had attended a Second Amendment rally. These revelations have prompted a complaint to the Justice Department’s internal watchdog alleging political bias inside the bureau.

According to documents obtained by Just the News, the employee’s security clearance was revoked months after interviews confirmed his support for Trump, gun rights, and his concerns about the COVID vaccine. The memos show that in spring 2022, agents for the FBI’s Security Division asked at least three witnesses whether the employee, whose name and job title were redacted from the memos, had been known to “vocalize support for President Trump” or “vocalize objections to Covid-19 vaccination.” One witness confirmed that the employee had declined to get the coronavirus inoculation.

The latter questions about the vaccine were asked shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court had struck down vaccine mandates in corporate workplaces and a separate federal court had issued an injunction on federal employee vaccine mandates.

Agents also inquired whether the FBI worker had attended the Richmond Lobby Day event in January 2021, a rally for Second Amendment supporters in Virginia. The agents’ notes referred to the colleague they were vetting as a “gun nut” but noted no promotion of violence.

You can read the memos here:

FBI officials declined to comment on why a worker’s support for Trump, the Second Amendment, or his hesitancy to get the COVID-19 vaccine had relevance to his security clearance. They also did not answer whether similar questions about support for Joe Biden or other medical issues, such as support for abortion, were asked.

In a letter to the DOJ inspector general, the FBI employee’s lawyer, Tristan Leavitt, revealed his client made protected whistleblower disclosures to both Congress and the DOJ about the politicization of the security clearance process. Leavitt alleged his client was subjected to this process simply because he self-reported taking a vacation day to go to Washington D.C. for the Jan. 6, 2021 rally.

Leavitt, who runs the nonprofit Empower Oversight center specializing in whistleblower cases, said his client did not engage in any criminal acts nor did he enter the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. He called the security review process evidence of political bias against conservatives inside the bureau.

“Instead of limiting its investigation to legitimate issues, SecD (Security Division) acted as if support for President Trump, objecting to COVID-19 vaccinations, or lawfully attending a protest was the equivalent of being a member of Al Qaeda or the Chinese Communist Party,” Leavitt wrote to Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, asking for an investigation.

“The FBI’s intentions are made clear by the questions it chose to put in black and white on a government document,” added Leavitt, whose group has represented IRS whistleblowers in the Hunter Biden case and several FBI agents and analysts who claim their security clearances were suspended or revoked because of their political views.

One of those FBI employees, intelligence analyst Marcus Allen, was vindicated last week when the bureau restored his clearance and paid him more than two years of back pay, according to CNN.

Leavitt told Horowitz he believed the documents detailing the security clearance review for his client were “shocking” evidence of an “abuse of authority and a violation of our client’s rights under the First Amendment.”

Horowitz’s office, which has documented years of FBI abuses ranging from mishandling informants to abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, did not immediately return a call or email seeking comment on whether it has opened a probe.

You can read that letter here:

If the inspector general opens an inquiry, it could help the public and Congress determine whether the FBI’s questions about Trump were more widespread than the employee who went to Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, or whether other questions about political preferences and medical treatments are asked during traditional security clearance reviews.

Two sources told Just the News that there is evidence information was gathered during FBI security clearance reviews on other employees’ political views, suggesting the practice was not isolated.

The memos provided unprecedented detail into how the security clearance review for Leavitt’s client was conducted. Prepared questions were typed into a form for the agents to ask, while witnesses’ answers were recorded by agents in handwriting below.

The handwritten observations offer significant insights into what the agents believed were relevant to the recommendation of whether the FBI employee should keep his clearance.

The employee “had right-wing views, nothing extreme,” an agent wrote from one interview that asked about his Trump support. In another notation, agents wrote the employee was “def Trump supporter, strong republican values.”

In a third interview, the agent noted the worker’s support for Trump, writing: “Very significantly supported, would listen to talk shows. Trump did not lose. Dems stole it. Militant point of view. Never implied would do anything aggressive/physical.”

On vaccine hesitancy, agents confirmed from one witness that the employee had not been vaccinated but was following bureau rules for unvaccinated employees.

“Very against masks and vaccines. Not vaccinated,” the agent wrote from one interview. “Not vaccinated and tried not to wear mask.”

The agent noted the employee was “connected to anti-vaccinated FBI groups” but had engaged in “no anti-FBI rhetoric.”

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former head of the government’s COVID response, recently told Congress he did not believe he saw any studies showing masks were effective in stopping the spread of the virus before mask mandates were imposed, and that the science since remains murky.

“I believe that there are a lot of conflicting studies too, that there are those that say, yes, there is an impact, and there are those that say there’s not. I still think that’s up in the air,” he told Congress.

Fauci also told the New York Times last year he believed in the final analysis that vaccine mandates were ineffective or counterproductive for Americans.

“I think, almost paradoxically, you had people who were on the fence about getting vaccinated thinking, why are they forcing me to do this?” Fauci said. “And that sometimes-beautiful independent streak in our country becomes counterproductive.”

By the time the FBI was asking about the worker’s vaccine views in April 2022, the U.S Supreme Court had already struck down vaccine mandates in the corporate workplace three months earlier, and the U.S. District Court for Southern Texas had issued an injunction against a federal employee vaccine mandate.

The Biden administration appealed the latter case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and granting review, the Supreme Court ruled that the judgment was to be vacated, and the case remanded with instructions to direct the District Court to vacate as moot its order granting a preliminary injunction.

On the employee’s Second Amendment views, FBI agents used terse language to describe the witnesses’ answers. “Gun nut, went to all 2nd Amendment gatherings,” the agent wrote in a summary of one interview. “…No promotion of violence.”

Leavitt wrote to the IG that he believed the FBI’s conduct in his client’s security clearance review violated the Constitution and Supreme Court cases involving employment law and the First Amendment.

“The Supreme Court held that terminating public employees for political patronage purposes—belonging to the wrong political party—‘to the extent it compels or restrains belief and association is inimical to the process which undergirds our system of government and is at war with the deeper traditions of democracy embodied in the First Amendment,’” he wrote.

Leavitt added: “Revoking a security clearance for being near those who did or merely sharing some similar political views as others who acted unlawfully is pure guilt by association.”

Continue Reading


Putin alleges the Biden Admin’s Weaponization of the Justice System against Trump is Polically Motivated




In a pointed critique of the Biden administration, Russian President Vladimir Putin has condemned what he describes as the political weaponization of the U.S. justice system. Putin’s comments come amidst a backdrop of escalating political tensions in the United States, particularly surrounding the recent legal actions against former President Donald Trump.

Speaking at a press conference in Moscow, Putin articulated his concerns regarding the integrity of American democracy, suggesting that the Biden administration’s actions undermine the foundational principles of fairness and justice.

“What we are witnessing in the United States is deeply troubling. The Biden regime’s use of the justice system as a tool for political gain is a dangerous precedent. It destroys the very fabric of democracy, where the rule of law is supposed to be impartial and unbiased,” Putin stated.

Putin’s remarks reflect a broader narrative that has been circulating among critics of the Biden administration, who argue that the legal proceedings against Trump are politically motivated. This sentiment has found resonance among a significant portion of the American electorate, as evidenced by Trump’s rising support following his conviction.

“It is clear that despite the conviction, or perhaps because of it, former President Trump’s support has only increased. This reaction from the American public indicates a deep-seated disillusionment with how justice is being administered under the current administration,” Putin added.

Trump’s legal troubles have indeed sparked a wave of support from his base, who view the charges against him as part of a larger conspiracy to prevent his potential return to the White House. According to recent polls, Trump’s popularity among Republican voters has surged, with many rallying behind him in defiance of what they perceive as an unjust prosecution.

Putin’s commentary extends beyond mere observation, implying that the internal strife within the United States could have broader implications for global stability. He warned that the erosion of democratic norms in one of the world’s leading democracies could set a dangerous example for other nations.

“When the principles of democracy are compromised in a country like the United States, it sends a message to the world that these values are negotiable. This can lead to a domino effect, where other nations feel emboldened to undermine democratic institutions and processes,” Putin cautioned.

The Russian president’s comments are likely to add fuel to the already intense debate over the state of American democracy and the rule of law. Supporters of the Biden administration argue that the legal actions against Trump are based on legitimate evidence of wrongdoing and are necessary to uphold the law. In contrast, Trump’s defenders see these actions as politically charged maneuvers aimed at neutralizing a prominent political adversary.

As the United States navigates this tumultuous period, the international community watches closely, mindful of the potential repercussions on global democratic norms and the balance of power. Putin’s critique underscores the geopolitical stakes involved and highlights the interconnected nature of political developments in major global powers.

In conclusion, Putin’s denunciation of the Biden administration’s alleged political weaponization of the justice system adds a significant international dimension to the domestic political drama unfolding in the United States. His remarks not only criticize the current U.S. administration but also underscore the broader implications for democracy worldwide, emphasizing the need for impartiality and integrity in the administration of justice.

Continue Reading