Connect with us


House GOP Finds Proof Joe Biden Is Guilty



Emails discovered by House Republicans demonstrate “beyond a shadow of a doubt” that Joe Biden exploited his position as vice president to shield his son. (Watch Below Video):

Below is the letter he sent to NARA:

“The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating President Biden’s meetings and communications with certain family members and their business associates during his tenure as Vice President. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) has published the Biden Vice Presidential Records Collection, which contains information relevant to the Committee’s work. 

“Many of these records have been redacted for publication pursuant to the Presidential Records Act (PRA) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). 

“To further our investigation, it is essential that the Committee review these documents in their original format.

“The Committee seeks unrestricted special access under the PRA to Case Number 2023-0022-F, entitled “Email Messages To and/or From Vice President Biden and Hunter Biden related to Burisma and Ukraine,” which has been published on NARA’s website. These records have been redacted for public release pursuant to the PRA and FOIA. 

“For example, an email bearing the subject “Friday Schedule Card,” is withheld in part under a “P6” and “b(6)” restrictions, denoting personal information regarding the subject under the PRA and FOIA respectively.  

“Attached to this email, and made available on the NARA website, is a document that indicates on 9:00 a.m. on May 27, 2016, Vice President Biden took a call with the president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. It is concerning to the Committee, however, that this document was sent to “Robert L. Peters”—a pseudonym the Committee has identified as then Vice-President Biden. 

“Additionally, the Committee questions why the then-Vice President’s son, Hunter Biden—and only Hunter Biden—was copied on this email to then-Vice President Biden.

“To further our investigation, the Committee needs to review these documents in their original format. The Committee also requests access to certain other documents and information described below. Please provide these documents no later than August 31, 2023:

“Complete, underacted versions of all documents from Case Number 2023-0022-F; 

“Any document or communication in which a pseudonym for Vice President Joe Biden was included either as a sender, recipient, copied or was included in the contents of the document or communication, including but not limited to Robert Peters, Robin Ware, and JRB Ware;

“Any document or communication in which Hunter Biden, Eric Schwerin, or Devon Archer was included either as a sender, recipient, copied, or was included in the contents of the document or communication; and

“All drafts from November 1, 2015 to December 9, 2015 of then-Vice President Biden’s speech delivered to the Ukrainian Rada on December 9, 2015.

“Special access to presidential records may be granted “to…Congress” and “to the extent of matter within its jurisdiction, to any committee… if such records contain information that is needed for the conduct of its business and that is not otherwise available….” 

“Furthermore, the PRA subjects Vice-Presidential records to its provisions “in the same manner as Presidential records.”

“The Committee’s need for these Vice-Presidential records is specific and well-documented. The Committee seeks to craft legislative solutions aimed at deficiencies it has identified in the current legal framework regarding ethics laws and disclosure of financial interests related to the immediate family members of Vice Presidents and Presidents—deficiencies that may place American national security and interests at risk. 

“The Committee is concerned that foreign nationals have sought access and influence by engaging in lucrative business relationships with high-profile political figures’ immediate family members, including members of the Biden family. For additional information regarding the Committee’s legislative purpose regarding its investigation of the Biden family’s international business, the Committee would direct you to three bank records memoranda it has released this year,” he wrote.



  1. Sid S

    August 20, 2023 at 5:03 pm

    Oh, nothing to see here. Let’s indict Trump again and his entire family, including 17 year old Baron. And then, all of his friends and his lawyers.
    Speaking of his lawyers, let’s intimidate them and their firms so that Trump and everyone associated with him CAN’t GET QUALITY representation!

    • XEP

      August 20, 2023 at 6:48 pm

      This is a dumb comment but I don’t care what happens to Trump or any of the.

      • Peter Noyes

        August 20, 2023 at 8:15 pm

        You are the problem. Even if you and I don’t care about Trump or any one near him, what happens when the shoes on the other foot and they say they don’t care what happens to us?

        • Papi

          August 21, 2023 at 3:49 pm

          So..let him walk? Follow the law like everyone else. He’s guilty AF This is nothing new.

      • Peter N

        August 20, 2023 at 8:17 pm

        You are the problem. Even if you and I don’t care about Trump or any one near him, what happens when the shoes on the other foot and they say they don’t care what happens to us?

    • BenOVerbich

      August 21, 2023 at 2:06 am

      Trump can’t get quality representation because he consistently screws over his attorneys and doesn’t pay them. He’s indicted because he committed criminal acts. Come on now, this is simple stuff that even small children can see and understand; and has nothing to do with what Joe Biden is or isn’t doing.

      • Bennie Andrew Rollins

        August 21, 2023 at 4:48 am

        They manufactured charges that were designed to make Trump look guilty in an attempt to discredit him.
        The “Presidential Document Act” states that the President may take any documents that he chooses.
        He told the J-6 people to peacefully protest. Pelosi’s people incited the attack, that they covered up, including the pipe bombs.
        Asking about corrupt election isn’t a crime.
        And alternate electorate is legal.

        All fake charges to make him look bad

        Why? He is going to stop all the shit that goes on in Congress like the bidens got caught doing
        Do your research

        • BenOVerbich

          August 21, 2023 at 5:20 am

          Pretty bold to say, “do your research” when you have such a loose grasp of reality. Unfortunately, your version of events is the trumptard moron version, with no basis in reality. Nobody cares that much about discrediting trump, he did it himself a long time ago. I think you mean the Presidential Records Act and that does allow him to declare certain documents as personal, prior to removing them. Not months after being caught with government documents and lying about them repeatedly and not classified defense documents that he didn’t bother to declassify when he had the opportunity. He absolutely did not recommend the J6 mob that he fired up peacefully protest and he refused to say anything to calm them down until hours after he basked in the destruction they were causing. Asking about what he believed to be a corrupt election is not a crime, the numerous actions he took and committed others to without any actual evidence, was criminal. Fake charges aren’t necessary to make him look bad, he’s done that for himself his whole life. And what exactly do you believe he’s going to stop that he didn’t even make a dent in the first four years he had the opportunity. You’re diluted and even small children can see through the nonsense you’re trying to buy into.

          • john

            August 21, 2023 at 6:17 am

            Your wasting your time buddy. People like this can’t hear you.
            They’ve been brainwashed by all the disinformation on NewsMax & others like it.
            I’ve got a buddy in MT. I rode out to see him this summer. I was there 3 days.
            Every night he plops down in front of the TV & watches this garbage & believes every word. He truly believes NewsMax is the most reliable source of information he can find.
            What do you do . . .
            It’s like a disease~

          • Karen

            August 21, 2023 at 10:21 am

            Lol . Your funny. And blind !!!! You come on now how about it? Lol o

      • Karen

        August 21, 2023 at 10:16 am

        Lol . Your funny. And blind !!!! You come on now how about it? Lol

        • BenOVerbich

          August 21, 2023 at 10:57 am

          Was that supposed to be a complete thought or some sort of coherent response to my comment? Because, it is neither. It reads like typical trump-speak jibberish that makes a vague insult as if you have some useful rebuttal, but the useful part just never materializes. This is how school children talk as well. Your ignorance is glowing, your orange messiah would be proud!

    • Janice

      August 21, 2023 at 10:23 am

      Dumb Ass. All Trump Hater but love the Sleazy Crime Family Biden.
      Vote him back in you WOKERS.

      For Me……. I’m still researching candidates. I’m a Conservative Republican
      But even considering Robert Kennedy…. So all you WOKERS just keep
      Focusing on Pres. Trump, like you have since before he was elected.
      Never seen a Party soo scared. Just hope Country goes Conservative.

      • BenOVerbich

        August 21, 2023 at 11:21 am

        You make an awful lot of assumptions based on nothing at all except that if someone dare disagree with the great Trumplethinskin, they must be a Dem, Biden loving, communist, “worker”. Guess what Trumptard? There’s a lot of lifelong republican, conservative citizens out here who have chosen to maintain their integrity and keep some basic values and, in turn, are disgusted by the moral less, habitual liar Donald Trump. Being repulsed by his countless inexcusable behaviors doesn’t make us any less conservative. It just means we have some self respect and refuse to be represented by a criminal moron.

  2. Greg

    August 21, 2023 at 7:27 am

    Ok so why hasn’t impeachment happened yesterday?

  3. Michael P Brown

    August 21, 2023 at 1:34 pm

    And your point is . They got a lot of documents texts and Emails among many other things of proof do something or give it up it’s gotten very old

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply


CIA Secret Report Reveals Warning to Russia of Terrorist Attack was Marked “Urgent” but Failed to Identify Target



US warning regarding a potential terrorist attack at a concert venue in Russia was labeled as “urgent.” However, the warning, according to Hersh’s source, did not specify Crocus City Hall as the target, despite some media reports suggesting otherwise.

The CIA allegedly provided the warning to Russian intelligence before the concert at the Crocus City Hall marking it “urgent,” meaning that the data in it “was credible and near term,” Hersh quoted the official as saying.

“The highly secret report on the attack in Moscow was prepared by the Counterterrorism Center at CIA headquarters and delivered to the terrorism division of the Russian Federal Security Service located in the old KGB building in Moscow. Separate briefings were presented in person by the FBI officer at the embassy. This is an established relationship,” the official said.

The warning, however, did not mention Crocus City Hall near Moscow and only said that an attack was being planned at some “public gathering,” according to the official.

The information provided by the official is contrary to a Washington Post report published on Tuesday claiming that Crocus City Hall was specifically identified in the warning as the target of a terrorist attack.

On March 22, several armed men broke into Crocus City Hall, a major concert venue just outside Moscow, and started shooting at people. They also started a fire in one of the auditoriums, which was full of people ahead of a concert. The attack left 695 casualties, including 144 dead, according to the latest data from the Russian Emergencies Ministry.

The four main suspects in the case — all of them citizens of Tajikistan — tried to flee the scene in a car but were detained and charged with terrorism. Russian authorities believe the perpetrators planned to flee to Ukraine, where a safe haven had been arranged for them. An investigation is underway.

Later in March, The New York Times reported, citing European and US security officials, that the US intelligence agencies did not provide the Russian side with all the information they had about the threat of a terrorist attack at Crocus City Hall in the Moscow Region out of fear that Russian authorities might learn about their intelligence sources or methods of work.

Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) Director Alexander Bortnikov also said that the information transmitted by the United States on the preparation of a terrorist attack was of a general nature, and the Russian special services responded to it.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Biden Admin is Using Fraudulent Climate Dataset in Push For Green Agenda, According to Government Watchdog




A government watchdog group has filed a complaint with the Biden administration over its use of a dataset frequently used to push its climate agenda.

Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT) filed the complaint with the Commerce Department over the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) “Billions Project” dataset, which purports to keep track of natural [and climate] disasters that have caused at least $1 billion in damages going back to 1980. The billion-dollar disasters (BDD) data — cited frequently by the Biden administration to insinuate that climate change is intensifying and justify sweeping green policies — is based on opaque data derived from questionable accounting practices, PPT alleges in the complaint.

“American families and businesses continue to struggle with persistently high inflation, which many attribute in large part to the energy policies and government spending of the current administration. The idea that blatant violations of scientific integrity could be underlying the rationale for these policies should concern every American,” Michael Chamberlain, PPT’s director, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Unfortunately, this is far from an isolated incident. The Biden Administration came into office pledging that its decision making would be grounded in the highest-quality science, but all too often has failed to live up to those promises.”

The complaint was filed with the Commerce Department, as NOAA operates under its auspices, Chamberlain told the DCNF.

PPT’s complaint alleges that NOAA does not adequately disclose its sources and methods for compiling the BDD dataset, adds and removes BDD events from the dataset without providing its rationale for doing so and produces cost estimates that are sometimes significantly different than those generated by more conventional accounting procedures.

While NOAA states that it develops its BDD data from more than a dozen sources, the agency does not disclose those sources for specific events or show how it calculates loss estimates from those sources, PPT’s complaint alleges.

The complaint further alleges that NOAA’s accounting methods are opaque and “produce suspect results.”

For example, when Hurricane Id alia took aim at Florida in 2023, NOAA initially projected that the storm would cause about $2.5 billion worth of damages before insured losses ultimately came in at about $310 million, according to PPT’s complaint, which cites the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation

 for that figure. Nevertheless, NOAA subsequently marked up its estimate for how much damage the storm caused to $3.5 billion, a discrepancy for which NOAA provided no explanation, PPT alleges in its complaint.

NOAA researchers have disclosed in the past that the agency considers factors such as functions pertaining to livestock feeding costs — in addition to more conventional types of damages — in their cost calculations.

Further, the complaint alleges that BDD events are quietly added and removed from the dataset without explanation, citing Roger Pielke Jr., a former academic who believes climate change to be a real threat but opposes politicized science. In a forthcoming paper analyzing the merits of BDD statistics, Pielke compared the dataset in late 2022 to the dataset in the middle of 2023 and found that ten new BDD events were added to the list and 3 were subtracted without explanation.

Apart from the issues with methodology alleged by PPT in its complaint, the use of BDD events as a proxy for climate change’s intensity is inherently misleading because economic data does not reflect changes in meteorological conditions, as Pielke has previously explained to the DCNF.

For example, increasing concentrations of assets, especially in coastal areas, can confound the usefulness of BDD events as an indicator for the intensity of climate change, as Energy and Environment Legal Institute Senior Policy Fellow Steve Milloy has previously explained to the DCNF. Hypothetically, the same exact hurricane could hit the same exact place, decades apart, with vastly different damage totals; this would be the case because there are simply more assets sitting in the way of the storm, not because the storm was any more violent due to worsening climate change.

NOAA has acknowledged this limitation of the dataset in prior communications with the DCNF.

Additionally, NOAA will add disasters to the list retrospectively because it adjusts for inflation, meaning that a hurricane that caused $800 million in damages in 1980 dollars would be added to the list because the damages exceed $1 billion when adjusted for inflation, for example.

The Biden administration has frequently cited the BDD dataset to substantiate its massive climate agenda.

For example, Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk cited the dataset in written testimony submitted to lawmakers in February explaining the White House’s decision to pause new approvals for liquefied natural gas export terminals.

The BDD statistics are also referenced Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), the Biden administration’s landmark climate report that is intended to provide the most sound scientific basis for lawmakers and officials to craft climate policy.

NOAA asserted that the increasing frequency of BDD events is a sign of intensifying climate change in a January press release and blog post summarizing 2023, and then defended the use of the dataset in subsequent communications with the DCNF.

“Sensational climate claims made without proper scientific basis and spread by government officials threaten the public’s trust in its scientific officials and undermines the government’s mission of stewarding the environment,” PPT’s complaint states. “It also poses the danger of policymakers basing consequential government policy on unscientific claims unsupported by evidence.”

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

U.S. Military Has Started Recalling Retirees Due to Recruiting Crisis




The U.S. Army Publishing Directorate released the ALARACT 017/2024, titled, “Utilization of the Army Retiree Recall Program.”

The document cites Executive Order 13223 from the Bush administration in 2001.

A retiree recall is a “retired Soldier who is ordered to active duty (AD) from the Retired Reserve or the retired list under 10 USC 688/688a, 12301(a), or 12301(d). Per AR 601-10, Recalled retiree Soldiers must be aligned to a valid vacant AC requirement that matches the grade and skill of the retiree before he or she may be recalled to AD,” according to the document. “The retiree population will be utilized as a last resort to fill Active Component vacant requirements.”

The ALARACT 017/2024 comes as the U.S. military is experiencing a recruitment crisis.

The U.S. Army recently announced that it is cutting thousands of positions. Authorized troop levels will now be an estimated 470,000 by fiscal year 2029, down 24,000 from its 494,000 soldiers.

“While making these investments and adding formations, the Army must also reduce force structure to protect readiness in light of decreased end strength. The Army is currently significantly over-structured, meaning there are not enough soldiers to fill out existing units and organizations. Army leaders seek to have at least 470,000 soldiers in the Active Component by FY29, which is nearly 20,000 above the current end strength but a reduction of about 24,000 authorizations compared to currently planned force structure,” the report


It added that the Army is “undertaking a similarly important transformation of its recruiting enterprise so that it can man units sufficiently, continue to bring the right types and amounts of new talent into the Army, and rebuild its overall end strength.” Noting the ongoing recruitment failure within the U.S. military, the document noted, “The Army must solve its recruiting challenges to successfully transform for the future.”

Continue Reading