Connect with us

Trending

Election Fraud Discovered in Fulton County Georgia via Lawsuit

Published

on

Duplicate ballots were counted, audit tally sheets were falsified, and evidence was suppressed to conceal criminal activity.

40K line items compare election results to Robert L. Peters’ re-installation, with an error rate of 59.5%. Think about that.

Through a lawsuit, the Dominion Voting Systems had to send in photocopied ballots.

Duplicate Reporting – over 4k ballots

Duplicate Scanned – Unknown

Video clip here:

20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. warren wayne adkins

    August 23, 2023 at 3:31 pm

    Arrest Fani Willis

  2. Kristy Pexton

    August 23, 2023 at 4:32 pm

    I feel like she for sure needs to be impeached, and charged legally with election fraund.

  3. Chas

    August 23, 2023 at 5:08 pm

    Since election fraud is a felony, anyone can arrest her and any others involved..

    • Mike Ekim

      August 24, 2023 at 3:18 am

      Can you clarify that?

  4. Doc

    August 23, 2023 at 5:14 pm

    I’m sure the judiciary will address this.

    fools

  5. Trump Lost. Get Over It!

    August 23, 2023 at 5:55 pm

    ROTFLOL

    • Democrats ARE STUPID

      August 23, 2023 at 6:21 pm

      By the cheating DUMBOCRAPS

    • Rob

      August 24, 2023 at 12:31 pm

      So you can’t acknowledge that there may be election fraud and we should just turn a blind eye? You are OK with not investigating to validate the results? Wow.. Fraud is NOT OK

      • Elizabeth

        August 29, 2023 at 1:34 pm

        There has ALREADY been several investigations into proposed voter fraud….nothing..
        . zilch..nadda was found. Let it go Biden won! It’s been three years nothing is going to change.u

    • Sheryl Stover

      August 24, 2023 at 10:25 pm

      You are joking right. I wouldn’t want to think that you are that stupid so as to not believe what is in front of your face.

  6. Democrats ARE STUPID

    August 23, 2023 at 6:18 pm

    Isn’t this the same state that just convicted him of tampering with the election . Guess they need to drop the charges .

  7. Niall

    August 23, 2023 at 8:56 pm

    You people want to believe in something, so bad, that never happened.

    This isn’t “breaking news.”

    This is debunked misinformation from July 2021. Garland Favorito is a conspiracy theorist who has been spreading misinformation well before the 2020 election.

    The worst part is that the Leading Report KNOWS this information was debunked two years ago, yet sold it to you as “BREAKING NEWS.”

    And ya’ll ate it up without even checking it’s accuracy.

    I can’t stand Fani Willis but for those of you hollering that she should be charged with election fraud….

    She wasn’t even in office when this happened.

    She actually was ON this ballot.

    For Christ’s sake ..

    • Andrew

      August 23, 2023 at 11:48 pm

      Take your misinformation and shove it! Proof is proof, and until you can prove it’s misinformation I’m free to disagree with idiots that lie like yourself. You just hate Trump and democracy for whatever reason. Trump made my life better, Biden has made it tough and it’s starting to get miserable.

    • Hunter

      August 24, 2023 at 3:36 pm

      Thank you
      Well said. This shit is so lame and pathetic.
      No surprise that election deniers are the same ones who still wave the losers flag of the Civil War.
      If I weren’t terrified by their ignorance and its impact on our democracy, I think I would feel bad for them, but I just can’t. Anyway, it’s nice to see some sanity in these comments, so thanks again and thanks also for calling out The Leading Report. They are the REAL villains here – selling their dumb lies to uneducated and uninformed.

  8. Great

    August 23, 2023 at 9:17 pm

    Can’t wait for the Tucker Trump interview

  9. realwesterner

    August 23, 2023 at 10:04 pm

    Communists admit to their malfeasance. Hmm. Okay…but who will prosecute the communists, when law enforcement and prosecutorial staffs are either communists, or beholden to the communists? Will the (lying, dirty, corrupt, immoral) communists prosecute themselves? Nope. There will, however, be more arrests of conservatives forthcoming, and executions also for those who complain about the communists froward tactics.

    • Whatamoron

      August 23, 2023 at 10:48 pm

      Are the communists in the room with us right now?

  10. Patti

    August 24, 2023 at 5:15 pm

    We, The People, are fed up with the corruption. Justice will prevail in the end .

    Lock up the Demo Elites for destroying our country‼️

  11. Diklxik

    August 24, 2023 at 9:53 pm

    I want to see this continuous abortion of justice to set the stage that ultimately shows the real people of this great USA that there is a real need with enough criminal means to definitely lock up politicians
    And from the Top on down the chain (not excluding the DOJ & FBI or any questionable government elite’s) The problem here is Donald Trump is not guilty of anything except SETTING THE BAR SO HIGH WHEN HE WAS PRESIDENT, that all those corrupt politicians know they can’t be expected to hold any position AND BE PRODUCE ANY REAL RESULTS‼️‼️

    I WOULD LOVE TO SEE SOME REAL POLITICAL CRIMINALS CONVICTED AND SENT TO REAL HARD PRISON TIME‼️
    Trump is the Lamb, that must go free, but paves the way for Biden, the Clintons, Pilosi, Bush both of them, the list goes on‼️

  12. David

    August 24, 2023 at 10:07 pm

    ‼️CENSORING, why am I even surprised as my initial remark is denied‼️
    Which said in a nutshell, that I hope this Pandora’s Box opens the doors to convict the real criminals⁉️
    Biden’s , Bush’s, Clinton’s‼️

    Trump is just the innocent Lamb that must go free, but pave the way as he sheds the light‼️

    Trump 2024, empty the Swamp

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Biden Crime Family

Justice Department Finds Transcripts They Previously Denied Existence of in Biden Classified Material Investigation

Published

on

In a significant development, the Justice Department revealed to a federal judge late Monday that it possesses transcripts of President Joe Biden’s conversations with a biographer, contradicting earlier denials. These transcripts are related to the recently concluded criminal investigation into Biden’s handling of classified materials before he became president.

The special counsel, Robert Hur, issued a report in February describing Biden as “a well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.” This report has prompted a surge of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and lawsuits aimed at obtaining records related to Hur’s investigation. These requests have come from various news outlets and conservative groups seeking to scrutinize Biden’s mental acuity and fitness for the presidency.

Concerns about Biden’s cognitive abilities were exacerbated by a poor debate performance against Donald Trump, leading Biden to announce on Sunday that he would not seek reelection. It remains unclear how his exit from the race will affect the Justice Department’s handling of the materials from Hur’s investigation.

The Justice Department has argued that releasing the audio of Biden’s interviews would violate his privacy, potentially lead to abuses like deepfakes, and discourage other witnesses from agreeing to recorded interviews. Biden has asserted executive privilege over these recordings to prevent House Republicans from holding Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to release them.

During a hearing last month, DOJ lawyers informed U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich that processing the audio files of Biden’s interviews with writer Mark Zwonitzer would be highly time-consuming. They claimed that the recordings spanned 70 hours and reviewing audio for classified material is more challenging than reviewing written material.

Justice Department lawyer Cameron Silverberg stated at a June 18 hearing that no transcripts from the special counsel existed. However, Silverberg’s recent court filing revealed that the DOJ had found six electronic files, consisting of 117 pages of verbatim transcripts, created by a court-reporting service from Biden’s discussions with Zwonitzer. Some of these conversations contained classified information, but DOJ policy barred pursuing charges against a sitting president.

In an unexpected reversal, the Justice Department reached out to Robert Hur directly after initially resisting requests from the Heritage Foundation to contact him about materials he used for his report. Hur confirmed he relied on the Biden-Zwonitzer audio recordings and a portion of Biden’s handwritten notes regarding a memo about Afghanistan.

Judge Friedrich has scheduled a hearing for Tuesday morning to address these developments. The Justice Department has indicated it will discuss with the parties seeking access to Hur’s materials whether Biden’s notes should also be processed for potential release.

The Justice Department’s admission of the existence of transcripts in the Biden classified material investigation marks a crucial turn in the ongoing scrutiny of Biden’s handling of classified information. As legal proceedings continue, the implications for transparency, presidential privacy, and the political landscape remain to be seen.

SOURCE: POLITICO

Continue Reading

Trending

Leaked Emails Expose BBC’s Unverified Reporting and Political Bias

Published

on

In a startling revelation, newly leaked internal emails from BBC correspondent Rami Ruhayem have unveiled serious allegations against the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). The emails suggest that the BBC has been broadcasting news without verifying claims or seeking evidence, raising concerns about journalistic integrity and ethical practices within the organization.

The leaked emails highlight a pattern of unverified reporting, particularly concerning coverage of the conflict in Palestine. Ruhayem, a Beirut-based correspondent, criticized the BBC for airing sensational stories about alleged atrocities committed by Hamas fighters without proper verification. These unsubstantiated claims were broadcast repeatedly, despite the lack of concrete evidence.

In one instance, Ruhayem detailed how graphic allegations about Hamas fighters were allowed to pass unchallenged on air. “From the start, it was evident that unverified claims of the most atrocious acts by Hamas fighters against Israelis were being circulated and repeated at the highest levels,” Ruhayem wrote. He pointed out that BBC presenters often failed to ask for evidence or clarify that the claims had not been verified.

The emails also accuse the BBC of sensationalizing news stories to push a specific political agenda. Ruhayem suggested that the unverified allegations were part of a broader strategy to garner political support for Israel’s actions. “The BBC’s approach to reporting has contributed to shaping public perception in a way that supports Israel’s actions,” he stated.

Ruhayem’s emails describe how the repetition of unverified and sensational claims served to reinforce extreme portrayals of Israel’s enemies. This biased coverage likely influenced public opinion and political discourse, aligning with Israeli propaganda efforts.

The leaked correspondence reveals deep-seated grievances among BBC staff regarding the organization’s editorial direction. Ruhayem noted that despite numerous evidence-based critiques from staff members, BBC management failed to address these concerns. Instead of fostering thorough examination and inclusive discussions, the management opted to continue the problematic editorial practices.

In an email dated May 1, 2024, Ruhayem wrote to BBC Director General Tim Davie and several departments, detailing the editorial failings. He emphasized the need for mechanisms to ensure accurate and ethical reporting, which he claimed were ignored by the management.

The allegations of journalistic malpractice have significant implications for the BBC’s reputation and credibility. Broadcasting unverified information and sensationalizing stories undermine the core principles of journalism: accuracy, fairness, and impartiality. These practices not only misinform the public but also erode trust in the media.

The leaked emails call into question the integrity of the BBC’s news coverage and highlight the need for rigorous journalistic standards. As the organization faces scrutiny, it must address these issues to restore its standing as a trusted news source.

The bombshell leaks from Rami Ruhayem’s emails expose serious flaws in the BBC’s reporting practices, revealing a troubling pattern of unverified reporting and political bias. As the media landscape continues to evolve, maintaining journalistic integrity and accountability remains paramount. The BBC must take urgent steps to rectify these issues and uphold the highest standards of journalism.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Secret Service Increased Security for Zelenskyy While Denying Security For Former President Trump

Published

on

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s trip to Washington in December 2022 was treated with the utmost importance, featuring extraordinary security measures. Hundreds of law enforcement and intelligence officials were activated, with the U.S. Secret Service leading the effort as Zelenskyy visited the White House and addressed Congress. From the moment he landed, Zelenskyy was accompanied by a Secret Service detail, and this protection continued until his departure. His motorcade was also provided by the Secret Service, assisted by local law enforcement.

Former Secret Service agent Don Mihalek explained that the agency is responsible for protecting all visiting foreign heads of state on U.S. soil. Zelenskyy’s visit was seen as particularly sensitive due to the ongoing war with Russia, raising concerns about potential threats from Russian agents or collaborators.

Security for Zelenskyy’s trip to Capitol Hill was akin to State of the Union preparations, with significant measures implemented. The Secret Service consulted with the Capitol Police, CIA, FBI, and other agencies to ensure safety. Every Capitol Police officer was on standby, given the potential threats.

In stark contrast, former President Donald Trump’s security detail has faced significant challenges in obtaining the same level of resources and personnel. Over the past two years, the Secret Service acknowledged denying multiple requests for increased security at Trump’s events. While the agency provided alternative measures, such as local sniper teams and hand-held magnetometers, Trump’s team felt these were insufficient and inadequate to address the security risks involved.

The recent attempted assassination of Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, has intensified scrutiny. A sniper managed to get rooftop access roughly 150 meters from Trump’s position, raising serious questions about security lapses. Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle is facing calls for her resignation, including from House Speaker Mike Johnson.

Despite these assurances, the disparity in security measures for Zelenskyy and Trump has raised significant concerns about the Secret Service’s prioritization and ability to adequately protect high-profile individuals. Trump’s security detail and advisers have repeatedly voiced their frustrations over what they perceive as an unequal allocation of resources and attention.

The decision to prioritize Zelenskyy’s security to such an extent, while denying crucial security enhancements for a former U.S. president, suggests a troubling inconsistency in the Secret Service’s approach to protection. The assassination attempt on Trump highlights the severe consequences of these decisions and underscores the urgent need for a reassessment of priorities and resource allocation within the agency.

The handling of security for Trump, particularly in light of the recent assassination attempt, exposes significant gaps and inconsistencies within the Secret Service. As scrutiny intensifies, the agency must address these failures, ensure equitable security measures for all high-profile individuals, and restore confidence in its protective capabilities. Director Kimberly Cheatle’s leadership and decisions are now under intense examination, and calls for her resignation reflect the gravity of the situation and the demand for accountability.

SOURCES: ABC NEWS, WASHINGTON POST, CNN

Continue Reading

Trending