Connect with us

Trending

Election Fraud Discovered in Fulton County Georgia via Lawsuit

Published

on

Duplicate ballots were counted, audit tally sheets were falsified, and evidence was suppressed to conceal criminal activity.

40K line items compare election results to Robert L. Peters’ re-installation, with an error rate of 59.5%. Think about that.

Through a lawsuit, the Dominion Voting Systems had to send in photocopied ballots.

Duplicate Reporting – over 4k ballots

Duplicate Scanned – Unknown

Video clip here:

20 Comments

20 Comments

  1. warren wayne adkins

    August 23, 2023 at 3:31 pm

    Arrest Fani Willis

  2. Kristy Pexton

    August 23, 2023 at 4:32 pm

    I feel like she for sure needs to be impeached, and charged legally with election fraund.

  3. Chas

    August 23, 2023 at 5:08 pm

    Since election fraud is a felony, anyone can arrest her and any others involved..

    • Mike Ekim

      August 24, 2023 at 3:18 am

      Can you clarify that?

  4. Doc

    August 23, 2023 at 5:14 pm

    I’m sure the judiciary will address this.

    fools

  5. Trump Lost. Get Over It!

    August 23, 2023 at 5:55 pm

    ROTFLOL

    • Democrats ARE STUPID

      August 23, 2023 at 6:21 pm

      By the cheating DUMBOCRAPS

    • Rob

      August 24, 2023 at 12:31 pm

      So you can’t acknowledge that there may be election fraud and we should just turn a blind eye? You are OK with not investigating to validate the results? Wow.. Fraud is NOT OK

      • Elizabeth

        August 29, 2023 at 1:34 pm

        There has ALREADY been several investigations into proposed voter fraud….nothing..
        . zilch..nadda was found. Let it go Biden won! It’s been three years nothing is going to change.u

    • Sheryl Stover

      August 24, 2023 at 10:25 pm

      You are joking right. I wouldn’t want to think that you are that stupid so as to not believe what is in front of your face.

  6. Democrats ARE STUPID

    August 23, 2023 at 6:18 pm

    Isn’t this the same state that just convicted him of tampering with the election . Guess they need to drop the charges .

  7. Niall

    August 23, 2023 at 8:56 pm

    You people want to believe in something, so bad, that never happened.

    This isn’t “breaking news.”

    This is debunked misinformation from July 2021. Garland Favorito is a conspiracy theorist who has been spreading misinformation well before the 2020 election.

    The worst part is that the Leading Report KNOWS this information was debunked two years ago, yet sold it to you as “BREAKING NEWS.”

    And ya’ll ate it up without even checking it’s accuracy.

    I can’t stand Fani Willis but for those of you hollering that she should be charged with election fraud….

    She wasn’t even in office when this happened.

    She actually was ON this ballot.

    For Christ’s sake ..

    • Andrew

      August 23, 2023 at 11:48 pm

      Take your misinformation and shove it! Proof is proof, and until you can prove it’s misinformation I’m free to disagree with idiots that lie like yourself. You just hate Trump and democracy for whatever reason. Trump made my life better, Biden has made it tough and it’s starting to get miserable.

    • Hunter

      August 24, 2023 at 3:36 pm

      Thank you
      Well said. This shit is so lame and pathetic.
      No surprise that election deniers are the same ones who still wave the losers flag of the Civil War.
      If I weren’t terrified by their ignorance and its impact on our democracy, I think I would feel bad for them, but I just can’t. Anyway, it’s nice to see some sanity in these comments, so thanks again and thanks also for calling out The Leading Report. They are the REAL villains here – selling their dumb lies to uneducated and uninformed.

  8. Great

    August 23, 2023 at 9:17 pm

    Can’t wait for the Tucker Trump interview

  9. realwesterner

    August 23, 2023 at 10:04 pm

    Communists admit to their malfeasance. Hmm. Okay…but who will prosecute the communists, when law enforcement and prosecutorial staffs are either communists, or beholden to the communists? Will the (lying, dirty, corrupt, immoral) communists prosecute themselves? Nope. There will, however, be more arrests of conservatives forthcoming, and executions also for those who complain about the communists froward tactics.

    • Whatamoron

      August 23, 2023 at 10:48 pm

      Are the communists in the room with us right now?

  10. Patti

    August 24, 2023 at 5:15 pm

    We, The People, are fed up with the corruption. Justice will prevail in the end .

    Lock up the Demo Elites for destroying our country‼️

  11. Diklxik

    August 24, 2023 at 9:53 pm

    I want to see this continuous abortion of justice to set the stage that ultimately shows the real people of this great USA that there is a real need with enough criminal means to definitely lock up politicians
    And from the Top on down the chain (not excluding the DOJ & FBI or any questionable government elite’s) The problem here is Donald Trump is not guilty of anything except SETTING THE BAR SO HIGH WHEN HE WAS PRESIDENT, that all those corrupt politicians know they can’t be expected to hold any position AND BE PRODUCE ANY REAL RESULTS‼️‼️

    I WOULD LOVE TO SEE SOME REAL POLITICAL CRIMINALS CONVICTED AND SENT TO REAL HARD PRISON TIME‼️
    Trump is the Lamb, that must go free, but paves the way for Biden, the Clintons, Pilosi, Bush both of them, the list goes on‼️

  12. David

    August 24, 2023 at 10:07 pm

    ‼️CENSORING, why am I even surprised as my initial remark is denied‼️
    Which said in a nutshell, that I hope this Pandora’s Box opens the doors to convict the real criminals⁉️
    Biden’s , Bush’s, Clinton’s‼️

    Trump is just the innocent Lamb that must go free, but pave the way as he sheds the light‼️

    Trump 2024, empty the Swamp

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Democrats Block SAVE Act in Senate, Allowing Potential for Illegal Immigrant Voting

Published

on

Senate Democrats have thwarted the passage of the SAVE Act, a pivotal bill aimed at bolstering the integrity of federal elections by mandating proof of citizenship for voting eligibility. This move follows the House’s approval of the bill with a narrow vote of 221-198, where almost all Democrats opposed the measure.

The SAVE Act seeks to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to enforce stricter voter registration standards. Specifically, it proposes that voters must furnish documentary evidence of U.S. citizenship to participate in federal elections, diverging from current regulations that only require such proof for state and local elections.

Senator Mike Lee, commending Representative Chip Roy for the bill’s passage, emphasized the necessity for Senate action, asserting, “Federal elections are only for U.S. citizens.”

However, despite efforts to expedite the bill in the Senate, Democrats raised objections, preventing its immediate passage. Senator Lee expressed frustration over the blockage, highlighting the potential consequences: “It’ll stop noncitizens from voting.”

In a statement on the Senate floor, Senator Lee voiced deep concerns, citing a recent study revealing significant opportunities for illegal voting by noncitizens. The study indicated that between 10% to 27% of noncitizens are registered to vote, with 5% to 13% actually participating in presidential elections.

Instances of voter fraud, including noncitizens illegally registered to vote, have been documented across the country. Reports have surfaced of unsolicited voter registration forms sent to noncitizens and inadequate checks during driver’s license issuance, contributing to vulnerabilities in the electoral system.

A video shared by Mike Howell, Executive Director of the Heritage Oversight Project, in collaboration with Muckraker.com, further underscored concerns. The video exposed instances of illegal aliens admitting to voter registration in North Carolina, emphasizing the need to safeguard American elections from foreign influence.

The SAVE Act’s blockade in the Senate has ignited a contentious debate over electoral integrity and the role of citizenship in voting rights. As the legislative battle continues, the future of federal voting regulations remains uncertain, with implications for the upcoming 2024 elections.

Continue Reading

2024 Race

Wisconsin Supreme Court Reinstates Unstaffed Drop Boxes Ahead of 2024 Election

Published

on

In a significant ruling on July 5, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided to reinstate the use of unstaffed drop boxes for absentee ballots, reversing the prohibition that had been in effect since 2022. The court’s 4–3 decision marks a pivotal change in Wisconsin’s election procedures ahead of the 2024 elections.

In 2022, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that state law did not allow for absentee drop boxes to be placed anywhere other than in election clerk offices. This decision effectively banned the use of unmanned drop boxes, which had been widely utilized in previous elections to facilitate absentee voting.

The reversal of the 2022 ruling was influenced by a change in the court’s composition. A new justice was elected in 2023, which led to a re-evaluation of the previous decision. During the arguments in May, Justice Jill Karofsky questioned the validity of the 2022 ruling, suggesting that it may have been a mistake. “What if we just got it wrong? What if we made a mistake? Are we now supposed to just perpetuate that mistake into the future?” Karofsky asked during the proceedings.

The court heard arguments three months before the August 13 primary and six months ahead of the November presidential election. Attorneys representing Republican backers of the 2022 ruling contended that there had been no changes in the facts or the law to justify overturning a decision that was less than two years old. Misha Tseytlin, at torney for the Republican-controlled Legislature, argued that overturning the ruling could lead to future instability, as the court might have to revisit the issue whenever its composition changes.

However, Justice Karofsky countered this by pointing out the potential flaws in the 2022 decision, questioning whether the court should continue to uphold a ruling that was “egregiously wrong from the start” with “exceptionally weak” reasoning and damaging consequences.

Democrats and voting rights advocates argued that the 2022 ruling misinterpreted the law by concluding that absentee ballots could only be returned to a clerk’s office and not to a drop box controlled by the clerk. David Fox, attorney for the groups challenging the prohibition, described the current law as unworkable and unclear about where ballots can be returned.

Several justices expressed concerns about revisiting the previous ruling, with Justice Rebecca Bradley cautioning against the court acting as a “super Legislature” and giving municipal clerks excessive discretion in conducting elections.

The case was brought by voter mobilization group Priorities USA and the Wisconsin Alliance for Retired Voters. Governor Tony Evers and the Wisconsin Elections Commission, which oversees the state’s elections, supported the use of drop boxes. Election officials from four counties, including the state’s two largest, also filed briefs in support of overturning the prohibition, arguing that drop boxes had been used securely for decades.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys highlighted the practical impact of the 2022 ruling, noting that over 1,600 absentee ballots arrived late and were not counted in the 2022 election when drop boxes were not in use. By contrast, in the 2020 election, when drop boxes were available, only 689 ballots arrived after Election Day, despite a significantly higher number of absentee voters.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision to reinstate unstaffed drop boxes is a crucial development in the state’s election laws, potentially increasing accessibility and convenience for absentee voters. As the 2024 elections approach, this ruling may have significant implications for voter turnout and the administration of elections in Wisconsin.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending

Elon Musk Backs Voter Bill Aimed at Providing Proof of U.S. Citizenship to Vote, Labels Opponents as “Traitors”

Published

on

Elon Musk recently voiced strong support for the SAVE Act, a bill proposed by House Speaker Mike Johnson aimed at ensuring only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections. The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act seeks to amend the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) by mandating documentary proof of U.S. citizenship for voter registration in federal elections.

The bill outlines several key measures:

  • State election officials must verify citizenship before providing voter registration forms.
  • Individuals must provide proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections.
  • States can accept various documents to make it easier for citizens to register.
  • States will have access to federal agency databases to remove non-citizens from voter rolls.
  • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is directed to determine whether to initiate removal proceedings if a non-citizen is identified as registered to vote.
  • DHS must notify state election officials when individuals are naturalized to ensure they can exercise their voting rights.

Supporters, including Musk, argue that these measures are necessary to protect the integrity of U.S. elections by preventing non-citizens from voting. Critics of the bill claim it could disenfranchise eligible voters by imposing additional hurdles to the registration process.

Continue Reading

Trending