Connect with us

WEF

CNN Falsely Claims That Climate is The Cause For Excess Deaths in Europe

Published

on

According to a recent video news report on CNN, they falsely claimed that 1.4 million people per year in Europe die as a result of climate change. That is untrue. Climate change occurs over longer periods of time rather than a single year, so it is impossible to attribute any portion of a given year’s death to climate change unless a long-term trend directly demonstrating a causal connection between changes and deaths made obvious. Data also demonstrates a significant global decline in deaths from temperature-related and severe weather-related causes over the past few decades, as well as a downward trend in pollution.

The CNN interview is titled “W.H.O.: 1.4 million European deaths can be blamed on climate change, environment” features a conversation with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Hans Kluge.

According to Kluge, 1.4 million deaths occur in Europe each year that are directly related to environmental factors like climate change. He provides no supporting information because the available information contradicts his claim. The interview and The WHO conference, where the organization is urging swift action on climate change to stop deaths from climate-related causes, coincide not by accident.

The long time horizons on which climate change operates must be understood. The World Meteorological Organization specifies 30 years as the minimum time period for any climate-related data, as stated on Climate at a Glance: Weather vs. Climate. One would need to observe a consistent trend in deaths that corresponded to changes in climate before one could attribute deaths to climate change. Such a trend doesn’t exist. Deaths can result from severe weather events and occasionally extreme temperatures (more frequently cold than hot), which are regularly experienced around the world, but those trends have sharply decreased during the recent period of modest warming. When weather-related deaths are on the decline, climate change cannot be adding to the number of fatalities.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) AR6 report, Chapter 11, Weather and Climate Extreme Events in a Changing Climate, provides conclusions, summarized in Figure 1, illustrating the fact that severe weather events cannot be detected as increasing nor attributed to human caused climate change:

Figure 1. Summary table showing lack of weather event attribution from Chapter 11 of the IPCC AR6 report.

There is no proof that any particular weather event is being caused or made worse by so-called man-made climate change caused by increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. No such attribution is made anywhere, not even in the IPCC’s summary of the state of global climate science.

In fact, over the past 100 years, the amount of human mortality directly related to weather-related catastrophes, such as floods, droughts, storms, wildfires, and extreme temperatures, has decreased by more than 99 percent. About 485,000 people per year on average died in weather-related disasters in the 1920s. By 2020 the average number of deaths attributable to extreme weather events had fallen 7,790. See Figure 2, below.

Figure 2. The graph demonstrates a vast improvement in human mortality related to all extreme weather events over a 100-year span from 1920 to 2021. Source: Dr. Bjorn Lomborg, data from International Disaster Database published in ScienceDirect.

Extremes of temperature can also be linked to mortality in addition to severe weather events. The rise in temperatures and subsequent rise in heat-related deaths are frequently attributed to climate change. But the reality is quite the opposite. A study published in the esteemed medical journal The Lancet in 2021 supported this. According to the study, over the course of the 20-year study period, the number of deaths attributed to cold temperatures decreased by a factor more than twice as large as the increase in deaths attributed to hotter temperatures. However, as shown in figure 3 below, there are three times as many deaths in Europe from cold-related causes as there are from heat-related causes.

Figure 3. Total global cold related deaths vs. heat related deaths by region from 2000 to 2019. Data source: Monash University press release.

Over the course of the study, temperature-related mortality significantly decreased, with a total of 166,000 fewer deaths attributed to suboptimal temperatures, in part due to the decrease in cold temperatures.

This study confirms what research previously published in The Lancet, the Southern Medical Journal, and the Centers for Disease Control, and National Health Statistics Reports has consistently shown that the cold is the biggest temperature related killer, not heat.

This contrary data flies in the face of the claims made on CNN by the WHO official Kluge.

But there’s more. In addition to blaming climate, WHO blames air pollution in Europe as a cause of death in the interview. But the data doesn’t even support that claim. Examining real world air pollution data from the European Environmental Agency, seen in Figure 4 below, show a sharp downtrend since 1990 on all types of air pollution in the 27 country European Union.

Figure 4. data from 27 nation EU emission inventory report 1990-2021 under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, published July 3, 2023.

Similarly to climate change, there cannot be more deaths in Europe today than there were in the past due to air pollution because there is less pollution. Bottom line: No matter how you look at it, the assertion that climate change is killing millions of Europeans annually, as CNN and the WHO claim, is not supported by actual data.

In this blatant instance, environmental activism has trumped accurate reporting, and CNN should be ashamed for running this interview.

Instead of urging the world to address climate change, the WHO should urge people to heed their own far more sensible and doable recommendations in their report, which reads, “Improving access to water, sanitation, and hygiene can save 1.4 million lives per year.”

Trending

FDA To Start Allowing American Red Cross to Accept Blood From Homosexual & Bisexual Men

Published

on

By

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced new regulations that will for the first time permit blood donations from homosexual and bisexual men.

The American Red Cross has already revised its donor screening guidelines to account for the move, doing away with a long-standing barrier that viewed patients’ sexual orientation and other aspects of the LGBT “rainbow” as severe risks.

Due to the horrifying sexual practices perpetrated by LGBT males, what was once considered possibly tainted or dirty blood is now a thing of the past as the American Red Cross adopts a new pro-gay position for blood donations.

The American Red Cross will no longer ask blood donors about their sexual orientation at the FDA’s request, citing “decades of data collection and assessments,” but they will still be questioned about deviant sexual behavior like anal sex, which if they commit will still require them to wait six months before trying to donate.

A New Study Claims gay, bisexual males are not having anal sex

In advance of the regulation change, the FDA carried out its own investigation known as ADVANCE. The organization has since said that sexual orientation is unimportant in terms of blood donations, including the waiting periods that the American Red Cross is maintaining for the time being.

The modification aligns the United States with more “progressive” nations like Canada and the United Kingdom, which already permit gay men to donate blood without raising any eyebrows.

According to the ADVANCE study, some sexually active gay and bisexual men who engage in “lower-risk behaviors” are nevertheless able to donate blood without any problems. A requirement of the FDA’s definition of “lower-risk behaviors” is the absence of new sex within the prior three months.

“There’s so much in the world that you can’t help with, and you sometimes have to see people going through difficult times, but something like giving blood feels like something so small that you can do, and it means a lot to me that I’ll be able to do that again,” celebrated Andrew Goldstein, an apparent LGBT himself and also a cancer researcher living in Los Angeles.

According to the ADVANCE study’s findings, 66 percent of gay and bisexual males said they had only one sexual partner and no anal intercourse. Sixty-nine percent of respondents stated that they had no anal sex or new partners within the previous three months.

According to the FDA, a gay or bisexual male who has just one partner and isn’t engaging in anal intercourse can donate blood without risk. However, any further dangerous behavior can make blood donation unsafe.

According to the American Red Cross, someone needs blood or platelets from a donor every two seconds in the United States. Red blood cell transfusions typically consist of three units, and 29,000 units are required daily to assist patients in need.

On average, a victim of a minor auto accident needs to receive 100 blood units. The FDA and the American Red Cross are altering the guidelines to allow more people to participate in the pool since LGBT perversion has spread like wildfire and disqualifies many people who would be eligible under the previous regulations.

“The Red Cross celebrates this historic move as significant progress and remains committed to achieving an inclusive blood donation process that treats all potential donors with equality and respect while maintaining the safety of the blood supply,” the non-profit organization said in a statement.

Continue Reading

Videos

BREAKING: Former VP of Pfizer, Mike Yeadon, says COVID is just the beginning of a 10-year plan by Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab.

Published

on

By

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Russian Military Leadership Claims U.S. Is Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic

Published

on

By

Sputnik reported:

“The United States has started preparing for a new pandemic by searching for virus mutations, Lt. Gen. Igor Kirillov, a Russian senior military official, said

▪Announced in July of this year, the Biden Administration created the Office for Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy.

▪This department’s priority areas include work on creating vaccines and drugs for stopping viruses and their genetically modified variants, Kirillov noted.

▪The leading role in the Pentagon’s military biological program will be played by the United States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, according to Kirillov.

▪Documents uncovered during the special military operation in Ukraine confirmed that this institution is involved in accumulating dangerous pathogens in various regions of the world, Kirillov added.”

Intel Republic also reported, by Kirillov:

“As in 2019, the United States has begun preparing for a new pandemic by looking for virus mutations.

We do not exclude the possible use of so-called defensive technologies for offensive purposes, as well as for the purpose of global control, by creating crises situations of a biological nature.”

The same Russian military commander who described the network of Bio Labs with ties to the United States that were discovered at the start of the Russian military operations in Ukraine is Kirillov.

You can read the full briefing here.

And below:

Briefing by Chief of Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Protection Troops of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov on U.S. military-biological activity

The military and biological activities of the United States and its allies in Ukraine and on the soil of other nations are still being examined by the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defense.

7b84ab7080cb8db9411cb Russian Military Leadership Claims US Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic Featured Top Stories World [your]NEWS

Many countries face a security concern as a result of US military biological operations.

Although the stated objectives of U.S. programs are to track disease prevalence and aid developing nations, in practice, we observe the Pentagon engaging in unrestricted dual-use research in violation of agreements made under the BTWC.

7b84ab7080cb8db9411cb Russian Military Leadership Claims US Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic Featured Top Stories World [your]NEWS

There is a clear trend: pathogens that fall within the Pentagon’s area of interest, such as COVID-19, avian influenza, African swine fever, subsequently become pandemic, and American pharmaceutical companies become the beneficiaries.

Earlier, we informed about the possible involvement of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the emergence of the new coronavirus.

There is a clear trend: pathogens that fall within the Pentagon’s area of interest, such as COVID-19, avian influenza, African swine fever, subsequently become pandemic, and American pharmaceutical companies become the beneficiaries.

Earlier, we informed about the possible involvement of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the emergence of the new coronavirus.
Projects to research this pathogen are implemented with the help of the EcoHealth Alliance intermediary organization. Since 2015, this company’s experts have been researching the diversity of the bat population in an effort to find new coronavirus strains and the processes by which they spread from animals to humans. Over 2,500 different beings have been studied in all.

I seem to recall that on October 18, 2019, John Hopkins University held the Event 201 exercise in novel York, two months before the first official news regarding the appearance of the novel coronavirus infection in China.

A suspected purposeful nature of COVID-19 and U.S. involvement in the disaster are questioned by the pandemic’s emergence in this scenario and the deployment of EcoHealth Alliance projects.

The next action the United States took was to establish the Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy in order to carry out its strategic goals for establishing worldwide biological control.

7b84ab7080cb8db9411cb Russian Military Leadership Claims US Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic Featured Top Stories World [your]NEWS

On July 21, 2023, the Office’s official formation was announced on the White House website.

The new institution is expected to be in charge of directing and coordinating efforts to counter known and unknow biological threats, including diseases that could spark another global disaster.

The development of vaccines and medications to treat viruses and their genetically modified versions, as well as the use of cutting-edge bioproduction technology, are among this office’s top priorities.

The structure will be led by retired Air Force Major General Paul Friedrichs, special assistant to the president and senior director for biodefense and global health security at the National Security Council.

In order to prepare for a new pandemic, the United States has started looking for virus mutations, much like in 2019. We do not completely rule out the possibility that the United States will deploy so-called defensive technologies for aggressive ends, as well as for global control by instigating biological crisis scenarios.

7b84ab7080cb8db9411cb Russian Military Leadership Claims US Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic Featured Top Stories World [your]NEWS

The biomedical warfare program of the military department will place a significant emphasis on the U.S. Army Research Institute for Infectious Diseases, which is currently led by Colonel Constance Jenkins.

It should be mentioned that the institute has a maximum biological containment level 4 (BSL-4) biolab and was founded at a bioweapons development facility at Fort Detrick.

It plays a significant role in the established Electronic Integrated Disease Surveillance System (EIDSS) of the Pentagon.

The institution is directly involved in the collection of dangerous pathogens in various parts of the world, the testing of illegal drugs, and the implementation of dual-use programs, according to documents obtained during the special military operation. These activities were ordered by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency of the U.S. Department of Defense (DTRA).

American biological programs in Ukraine have engaged the U.S. Army Institute of Infectious Diseases. As a result, members of the institute actively worked on the UP-1 and UP-8 projects. These studies looked into the potential for arthropods to transmit diseases like hantaviruses, tick-borne encephalitis virus, Congo-Crimean hemorrhagic fever, and rickettsiae.

In South America, Africa, Transcaucasia, and South-East Asia, the Institute has active agents. It is done in the laboratories of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and the Navy Medical Research Center.

U.S. Army Institute of Infectious Diseases personnel significantly increased their presence in these African nations in response to the 2014–2016 Ebola outbreak in Uganda, Kenya, Guinea, and Liberia in order to collect live viral samples of the fatal disease.

A full range of military-applied work with dangerous pathogens — components of biological weapons — can therefore be carried out, including work to enhance the pathogenic properties of pathogens of dangerous human and animal diseases. This is made possible by the Institute’s available production and experimental base.

Documents enabling the expansion of the Ukrainian military-biological dossier have been delivered to the Russian Federation’s Ministry of Defense.

7b84ab7080cb8db9411cb Russian Military Leadership Claims US Working To Manufacture Another Pandemic Featured Top Stories World [your]NEWS

Today we would like to supplement this list with representatives of Ukrainian State institutions and private companies, involved in the implementation of United States military-biological programs. They are:

Natalia Dudko served as the Project Coordinator and Senior Specialist of the STCU. For 25 years, she coordinated more than 250 STCU projects in various scientific fields.

Lyudmila Chernenko, General Director of the Centre for Public Health of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. She is on the list of Ukrainian specialists, who have participated in U.S.-funded research projects.

Aleksandr Matskov, Deputy General Director of the Centre for Public Health of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. He oversaw the overall implementation of a U.S.-funded dual-use project on COVID-19.

The Russian Defense Ministry continues to publish the names of officials of biotechnology corporations and other Pentagon contractors, involved in the implementation of U.S. military-biological programms on the territory of Ukraine.

Continue Reading

Trending