Connect with us

Biden Administration

Biden Stole $1 Billion From U.S. Taxpayers in Covid “Test” Kits SCAM



Biden allegedly stole between $900 million and $1.1 billion from American tax payers to purchase countless pallets of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) test kits.

According to reports, Biden and his cronies bought 100,000 test kits at a time for $1 each. However, it’s been made aware to us that the administration only bought 400 million COVID test kits, with the first batch being 300 million and the second batch being 100 million. So where did the rest of the money go?

By using basic math, Americans should have paid no more than $400 million for this at a cost of $1 per person, as buying in bulk results in lower prices per unit. What happened to the remaining $600,000,000 that Vice President Biden is said to have paid communist China for these test kits?

Biden regime admits to spending $1.3 billion on covid test kits, so what happened to the other $900 million?

It turns out that the Biden administration publicly stated that 400 million COVID test kits, which were supposed to cost $1 each, were purchased for $1.3 billion. What happened to the other $900 million if this is true?

According to a report from the website Root for America, each test kit at such a purchase volume should have cost no more than 50 cents each, so the Biden administration should have only spent $200 million, leaving $1.1 billion unaccounted for.

This is where the $900 million to $1.1 billion figure range comes from, which begs lots of questions as to what happened to the rest of all that cash. Did the Biden Crime Family pocket some of it? Did the Biden Crime Family’s corrupt connections in Ukraine and communist China also get a cut? How much did “the big guy,” referring to Joe Biden himself, personally receive from the scam?

“Knowing the lifetime of corruption Biden has been involved in … and Hunter Biden’s laptop with proof of crimes, extortion and bribery … and proof that Biden himself is ‘the Big Guy’ … and knowing that the Bidens accepted $10 million from Burisma … and knowing Congressman James Comer says his committee’s investigation shows Biden stole $40 million as Vice President in multiple deals … Does anyone doubt that Biden and the Biden Crime Family got all or some portion of this $900 million to $1.1 billion overpayment?” asks Wayne Allyn Root.

“Perhaps the Big Guy got $100 million as a 10% commission. Maybe he split it 50 / 50 with the Chinese company (which is undoubtedly owned by the CCP). Or maybe Biden just kept the whole billion dollars of taxpayer money for himself.”

“Maybe this is one of many government contracts that Biden used to rob taxpayers blind in the past 2 ½ years. Maybe he’s stolen tens of billions. Afterall, he’s no longer the VP. President Joe Biden is in the Big Leagues now! … Or maybe, Biden is really so dumb and incompetent, he simply overpaid a billion dollars of your taxpayer money to China and the CCP.”

What do you think happened to the extra $900 million to $1.1 billion that is completely unaccounted for? Tell us in the comments below. Root’s gut instinct is telling him that what took place with these covid test kits “was the crime of the century,” and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may be responsible for dividing up the loot “somewhere offshore.”



  1. Robert Russell

    July 4, 2023 at 5:39 pm

    I think he used some of that money to pay off the deepstate and the FBI as well as the democratic party and the fake news media assholes to cover for him and Hunter.

    • Kevin

      July 5, 2023 at 10:54 am

      Lmmfao, fatty trump gotta be 1 of the all time greatest grifters.

      • Mel

        July 5, 2023 at 2:36 pm

        Poor ungrounded child. Was the article about Trump?

  2. Anne Kulju

    July 4, 2023 at 5:48 pm

    It will fund Democratic reelection campaigns

  3. Warren Baldwin

    July 4, 2023 at 7:20 pm

    What ever the sorry ass crook done with it it was tax payers money !!!!!!! We want to know where it is and where it went!!!!!!!!???????? And who was payed off.

  4. Penny Glassman

    July 4, 2023 at 8:44 pm

    We the people want out money back!!!

  5. Johnny L

    July 5, 2023 at 12:05 am

    If things stay tbe same, nothing will ever come of this. Bidens, Clintons and Obamas seem to have life long get out of jail free cards.

  6. Hairstyles

    July 5, 2023 at 2:26 pm

    Today, taking into consideration the fast life-style that everyone leads, credit cards have a huge demand in the economy. Persons from every field are using credit card and people who aren’t using the credit cards have arranged to apply for just one. Thanks for revealing your ideas about credit cards.

  7. Haircuts

    July 5, 2023 at 6:50 pm

    Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Many thanks

  8. Hairstyles

    July 6, 2023 at 4:16 pm

    I was just seeking this information for a while. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this type of informative sites in top of the list. Generally the top web sites are full of garbage.

  9. напиши ещё

    July 9, 2023 at 7:56 pm

    Автор представил широкий спектр мнений на эту проблему, что позволяет читателям самостоятельно сформировать свое собственное мнение. Полезное чтение для тех, кто интересуется данной темой.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Biden Administration

Former Obama-Biden Advisor Claims “The First Amendment Is Out of Control,” Hinders Government Action



In a controversial opinion piece published recently, Tim Wu, an advisor to both the Obama and Biden administrations, argued that the First Amendment is becoming a significant obstacle to effective governance. The essay, titled “The First Amendment is Out of Control,” has sparked widespread debate and criticism.

Wu’s argument centers on the assertion that the First Amendment, designed to protect free speech, is now being exploited by powerful entities, including Big Tech companies, to resist regulation and oversight. He cites recent Supreme Court rulings regarding Texas and Florida laws aimed at regulating social media platforms as examples of this exploitation.

According to Wu, the collaboration between the government and major social media platforms is often hindered by the First Amendment, which is used as a defense to protect free speech in digital public forums. He suggests that this constitutional protection is being misused to prevent necessary government action aimed at safeguarding citizens.

Critics, however, argue that Wu’s perspective misinterprets the fundamental purpose of the First Amendment. They contend that the amendment’s role is precisely to protect citizens from government overreach and censorship, ensuring that free speech remains a cornerstone of democracy. The idea that the First Amendment is an obstacle rather than a protector is seen by many as a dangerous and misguided interpretation.

Furthermore, Wu’s essay touches on the issue of banning platforms like TikTok and implementing age verification laws, such as California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code. He suggests that the First Amendment stands in the way of these actions, which he believes are necessary for national security and protecting minors online. Critics counter that these measures, if implemented, could set precedents for broader and potentially harmful censorship practices.

Wu’s reference to the First Amendment as a “suicide pact,” borrowing language from a 1949 dissenting opinion in the Terminiello v. City of Chicago case, underscores the dramatic tone of his argument. He suggests that the amendment, while intended to safeguard freedoms, can also be interpreted in ways that undermine societal safety and security.

In conclusion, Tim Wu’s essay has reignited the debate over the balance between free speech and governmental regulation. While Wu argues that the First Amendment’s current application hinders effective governance and protection of citizens, his critics maintain that the amendment is essential for safeguarding democratic principles and preventing government overreach. As this debate continues, the interpretation and application of the First Amendment remain at the forefront of discussions about free speech and public safety in the digital age.


Continue Reading

Biden Administration

DHS and FBI Issue Warning About Large Fourth of July Events as ‘Attractive’ Targets for



The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a warning on Wednesday regarding potential threats to large Fourth of July celebrations. According to an internal bulletin obtained by ABC News, these events are considered “attractive” targets for lone offenders and small groups with malicious intentions.

The bulletin emphasizes the risk posed by individuals and small groups who might exploit the gatherings for terrorism or other harmful activities. The warning comes as the nation prepares for Independence Day festivities, which traditionally draw large crowds to public spaces.

The FBI and DHS are urging local law enforcement and event organizers to increase vigilance and security measures. The agencies highlight the importance of public awareness and cooperation, encouraging individuals to report any suspicious activities immediately.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Biden is 7 Times More Popular with Ukrainians than Trump, Poll Reveals



In a recent poll conducted by The Counteroffensive/Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, President Joe Biden emerges as significantly more popular among Ukrainians compared to former President Donald Trump. This inaugural poll offers insights into Ukrainian sentiment towards American leadership during their ongoing conflict with Russia.

According to The Hill, a striking 46.7 percent of Ukrainian respondents expressed a preference for President Biden as the leader they believe would better support Ukraine’s war effort. In contrast, only 6.5 percent of those polled favored Trump in this regard.

Continue Reading