Connect with us

Biden Administration

Biden Stole $1 Billion From U.S. Taxpayers in Covid “Test” Kits SCAM

Published

on

Biden allegedly stole between $900 million and $1.1 billion from American tax payers to purchase countless pallets of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) test kits.

According to reports, Biden and his cronies bought 100,000 test kits at a time for $1 each. However, it’s been made aware to us that the administration only bought 400 million COVID test kits, with the first batch being 300 million and the second batch being 100 million. So where did the rest of the money go?

By using basic math, Americans should have paid no more than $400 million for this at a cost of $1 per person, as buying in bulk results in lower prices per unit. What happened to the remaining $600,000,000 that Vice President Biden is said to have paid communist China for these test kits?

Biden regime admits to spending $1.3 billion on covid test kits, so what happened to the other $900 million?

It turns out that the Biden administration publicly stated that 400 million COVID test kits, which were supposed to cost $1 each, were purchased for $1.3 billion. What happened to the other $900 million if this is true?

According to a report from the website Root for America, each test kit at such a purchase volume should have cost no more than 50 cents each, so the Biden administration should have only spent $200 million, leaving $1.1 billion unaccounted for.

This is where the $900 million to $1.1 billion figure range comes from, which begs lots of questions as to what happened to the rest of all that cash. Did the Biden Crime Family pocket some of it? Did the Biden Crime Family’s corrupt connections in Ukraine and communist China also get a cut? How much did “the big guy,” referring to Joe Biden himself, personally receive from the scam?

“Knowing the lifetime of corruption Biden has been involved in … and Hunter Biden’s laptop with proof of crimes, extortion and bribery … and proof that Biden himself is ‘the Big Guy’ … and knowing that the Bidens accepted $10 million from Burisma … and knowing Congressman James Comer says his committee’s investigation shows Biden stole $40 million as Vice President in multiple deals … Does anyone doubt that Biden and the Biden Crime Family got all or some portion of this $900 million to $1.1 billion overpayment?” asks Wayne Allyn Root.

“Perhaps the Big Guy got $100 million as a 10% commission. Maybe he split it 50 / 50 with the Chinese company (which is undoubtedly owned by the CCP). Or maybe Biden just kept the whole billion dollars of taxpayer money for himself.”

“Maybe this is one of many government contracts that Biden used to rob taxpayers blind in the past 2 ½ years. Maybe he’s stolen tens of billions. Afterall, he’s no longer the VP. President Joe Biden is in the Big Leagues now! … Or maybe, Biden is really so dumb and incompetent, he simply overpaid a billion dollars of your taxpayer money to China and the CCP.”

What do you think happened to the extra $900 million to $1.1 billion that is completely unaccounted for? Tell us in the comments below. Root’s gut instinct is telling him that what took place with these covid test kits “was the crime of the century,” and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) may be responsible for dividing up the loot “somewhere offshore.”

11 Comments

11 Comments

  1. Robert Russell

    July 4, 2023 at 5:39 pm

    I think he used some of that money to pay off the deepstate and the FBI as well as the democratic party and the fake news media assholes to cover for him and Hunter.

    • Kevin

      July 5, 2023 at 10:54 am

      Lmmfao, fatty trump gotta be 1 of the all time greatest grifters.

      • Mel

        July 5, 2023 at 2:36 pm

        Poor ungrounded child. Was the article about Trump?

  2. Anne Kulju

    July 4, 2023 at 5:48 pm

    It will fund Democratic reelection campaigns

  3. Warren Baldwin

    July 4, 2023 at 7:20 pm

    What ever the sorry ass crook done with it it was tax payers money !!!!!!! We want to know where it is and where it went!!!!!!!!???????? And who was payed off.

  4. Penny Glassman

    July 4, 2023 at 8:44 pm

    We the people want out money back!!!

  5. Johnny L

    July 5, 2023 at 12:05 am

    If things stay tbe same, nothing will ever come of this. Bidens, Clintons and Obamas seem to have life long get out of jail free cards.

  6. Hairstyles

    July 5, 2023 at 2:26 pm

    Today, taking into consideration the fast life-style that everyone leads, credit cards have a huge demand in the economy. Persons from every field are using credit card and people who aren’t using the credit cards have arranged to apply for just one. Thanks for revealing your ideas about credit cards.

  7. Haircuts

    July 5, 2023 at 6:50 pm

    Hello there! Would you mind if I share your blog with my zynga group? There’s a lot of folks that I think would really enjoy your content. Please let me know. Many thanks

  8. Hairstyles

    July 6, 2023 at 4:16 pm

    I was just seeking this information for a while. After 6 hours of continuous Googleing, finally I got it in your site. I wonder what is the lack of Google strategy that do not rank this type of informative sites in top of the list. Generally the top web sites are full of garbage.

  9. напиши ещё

    July 9, 2023 at 7:56 pm

    Автор представил широкий спектр мнений на эту проблему, что позволяет читателям самостоятельно сформировать свое собственное мнение. Полезное чтение для тех, кто интересуется данной темой.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Biden Administration

Biden Admin is Using Fraudulent Climate Dataset in Push For Green Agenda, According to Government Watchdog

Published

on

By

A government watchdog group has filed a complaint with the Biden administration over its use of a dataset frequently used to push its climate agenda.

Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT) filed the complaint with the Commerce Department over the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) “Billions Project” dataset, which purports to keep track of natural [and climate] disasters that have caused at least $1 billion in damages going back to 1980. The billion-dollar disasters (BDD) data — cited frequently by the Biden administration to insinuate that climate change is intensifying and justify sweeping green policies — is based on opaque data derived from questionable accounting practices, PPT alleges in the complaint.

“American families and businesses continue to struggle with persistently high inflation, which many attribute in large part to the energy policies and government spending of the current administration. The idea that blatant violations of scientific integrity could be underlying the rationale for these policies should concern every American,” Michael Chamberlain, PPT’s director, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “Unfortunately, this is far from an isolated incident. The Biden Administration came into office pledging that its decision making would be grounded in the highest-quality science, but all too often has failed to live up to those promises.”

The complaint was filed with the Commerce Department, as NOAA operates under its auspices, Chamberlain told the DCNF.

PPT’s complaint alleges that NOAA does not adequately disclose its sources and methods for compiling the BDD dataset, adds and removes BDD events from the dataset without providing its rationale for doing so and produces cost estimates that are sometimes significantly different than those generated by more conventional accounting procedures.

While NOAA states that it develops its BDD data from more than a dozen sources, the agency does not disclose those sources for specific events or show how it calculates loss estimates from those sources, PPT’s complaint alleges.

The complaint further alleges that NOAA’s accounting methods are opaque and “produce suspect results.”

For example, when Hurricane Id alia took aim at Florida in 2023, NOAA initially projected that the storm would cause about $2.5 billion worth of damages before insured losses ultimately came in at about $310 million, according to PPT’s complaint, which cites the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation

 for that figure. Nevertheless, NOAA subsequently marked up its estimate for how much damage the storm caused to $3.5 billion, a discrepancy for which NOAA provided no explanation, PPT alleges in its complaint.

NOAA researchers have disclosed in the past that the agency considers factors such as functions pertaining to livestock feeding costs — in addition to more conventional types of damages — in their cost calculations.

Further, the complaint alleges that BDD events are quietly added and removed from the dataset without explanation, citing Roger Pielke Jr., a former academic who believes climate change to be a real threat but opposes politicized science. In a forthcoming paper analyzing the merits of BDD statistics, Pielke compared the dataset in late 2022 to the dataset in the middle of 2023 and found that ten new BDD events were added to the list and 3 were subtracted without explanation.

Apart from the issues with methodology alleged by PPT in its complaint, the use of BDD events as a proxy for climate change’s intensity is inherently misleading because economic data does not reflect changes in meteorological conditions, as Pielke has previously explained to the DCNF.

For example, increasing concentrations of assets, especially in coastal areas, can confound the usefulness of BDD events as an indicator for the intensity of climate change, as Energy and Environment Legal Institute Senior Policy Fellow Steve Milloy has previously explained to the DCNF. Hypothetically, the same exact hurricane could hit the same exact place, decades apart, with vastly different damage totals; this would be the case because there are simply more assets sitting in the way of the storm, not because the storm was any more violent due to worsening climate change.

NOAA has acknowledged this limitation of the dataset in prior communications with the DCNF.

Additionally, NOAA will add disasters to the list retrospectively because it adjusts for inflation, meaning that a hurricane that caused $800 million in damages in 1980 dollars would be added to the list because the damages exceed $1 billion when adjusted for inflation, for example.

The Biden administration has frequently cited the BDD dataset to substantiate its massive climate agenda.

For example, Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk cited the dataset in written testimony submitted to lawmakers in February explaining the White House’s decision to pause new approvals for liquefied natural gas export terminals.

The BDD statistics are also referenced Fifth National Climate Assessment (NCA5), the Biden administration’s landmark climate report that is intended to provide the most sound scientific basis for lawmakers and officials to craft climate policy.

NOAA asserted that the increasing frequency of BDD events is a sign of intensifying climate change in a January press release and blog post summarizing 2023, and then defended the use of the dataset in subsequent communications with the DCNF.

“Sensational climate claims made without proper scientific basis and spread by government officials threaten the public’s trust in its scientific officials and undermines the government’s mission of stewarding the environment,” PPT’s complaint states. “It also poses the danger of policymakers basing consequential government policy on unscientific claims unsupported by evidence.”

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

U.S. Military Has Started Recalling Retirees Due to Recruiting Crisis

Published

on

By

The U.S. Army Publishing Directorate released the ALARACT 017/2024, titled, “Utilization of the Army Retiree Recall Program.”

The document cites Executive Order 13223 from the Bush administration in 2001.

A retiree recall is a “retired Soldier who is ordered to active duty (AD) from the Retired Reserve or the retired list under 10 USC 688/688a, 12301(a), or 12301(d). Per AR 601-10, Recalled retiree Soldiers must be aligned to a valid vacant AC requirement that matches the grade and skill of the retiree before he or she may be recalled to AD,” according to the document. “The retiree population will be utilized as a last resort to fill Active Component vacant requirements.”

The ALARACT 017/2024 comes as the U.S. military is experiencing a recruitment crisis.

The U.S. Army recently announced that it is cutting thousands of positions. Authorized troop levels will now be an estimated 470,000 by fiscal year 2029, down 24,000 from its 494,000 soldiers.

“While making these investments and adding formations, the Army must also reduce force structure to protect readiness in light of decreased end strength. The Army is currently significantly over-structured, meaning there are not enough soldiers to fill out existing units and organizations. Army leaders seek to have at least 470,000 soldiers in the Active Component by FY29, which is nearly 20,000 above the current end strength but a reduction of about 24,000 authorizations compared to currently planned force structure,” the report

 states.

It added that the Army is “undertaking a similarly important transformation of its recruiting enterprise so that it can man units sufficiently, continue to bring the right types and amounts of new talent into the Army, and rebuild its overall end strength.” Noting the ongoing recruitment failure within the U.S. military, the document noted, “The Army must solve its recruiting challenges to successfully transform for the future.”

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Trucker Claims he was Forced at Gunpoint to Transport Illegal Immigrants

Published

on

A truck driver in Texas who was arrested for smuggling migrants claims that he was forced to transfer them at gunpoint.

Texas Governor Greg Abbott has highlighted smuggling and drug activities linked to illegal immigration as reasons for deploying Texas National Guard personnel and Texas Department of Public Safety officers to address the surge in migrant encounters at the US-Mexico border, which reached a record 2.4 million during the 2023 fiscal year, marking a substantial increase from the previous year.

Senate Bill 4 includes a provision allowing Texas to enforce its own immigration regulations, distinct from federal oversight. This provision proposes increasing the minimum sentence for convicted migrant smugglers or individuals operating stash houses from two to ten years.

The truck driver in question, Luis Enrique Lara from Laredo, was apprehended at a highway checkpoint on March 24 and charged with various offenses related to transporting migrants, as per an affidavit from the Laredo Morning Times. The affidavit indicates that during a checkpoint s top, law enforcement’s K-9 unit signaled potential contraband in Lara’s trailer. Subsequently, officers found three migrants hidden under pillows, contrary to Lara’s assertion that he was unaware of their presence.

Lara explained to authorities that he was coerced by an individual named “Luis” at gunpoint about a month before his arrest at a gas station in Katy. This person allegedly instructed Lara to transport migrants to San Antonio, leading to the events that culminated in his detention.

Concerns about human and drug trafficking across the southern border have been raised by various political figures and officials, including former US Ambassador to the UN and White House National Security Adviser John Bolton, who expressed worries about criminal exploitation of border vulnerabilities.

FBI Director Christopher Wray has also testified about the potential for terrorists using fake IDs to enter the country undetected, emphasizing the challenges faced by federal agencies in monitoring illegal immigration flows.

Governor Abbott, while facing criticism from some religious leaders regarding the portrayal of migrants, has urged legislative action to address illegal border crossings. The political landscape suggests differing approaches depending on election outcomes, with potential shifts in immigration policies based on who holds office.

SOURCE: LAREDO MORNING TIMES

Continue Reading

Trending