Connect with us


BBC Could Be Responsible For 2M Excess Deaths in Europe Due to Censoring The Dangers of COVID Vaccines



The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is in charge of the Ministry of Truth, which the government of the United Kingdom established in 2019 in reaction to what they claimed was the overwhelming volume of false information and fake news flowing online.

They called this Ministry of Truth, The Trusted News Initiative (TNI).

The AP, AFP, First Draft, Google/YouTube, Twitter, Reuters, Financial Times, Meta (Facebook), European Broadcasting Union, CBC/Radio-Canada, The Hindu, Microsoft, and The Washington Post are just a few of the influential partners in the BBC’s Trusted News Initiative.

It is the only “forum” of its sort in the entire world created to accept information that has not been authorized by The Ministry of Truth in real-time.


To ensure that only information endorsed by strong governments and other strong institutions, like the BBC, the UN, and the World Economic Forum (WEF), reached the public, the Ministry of Truth quickly established a set of rigid standards and guidelines for news organizations to adhere to.

Fact-checking, transparency, and impartiality were among the norms that were emphasized, and news organizations that were found to be disseminating material that had not been endorsed by strong governments or other influential institutions were subject to harsh penalties.

This new Ministry of Truth began to extend its influence beyond simply news organizations as it grew in strength and influence.

Powerful Governments and other influential organizations claimed that scientists and experts in a variety of subjects needed to have their research and conclusions “vetted” for accuracy and bias. As a result, scientists and experts in other fields were also brought under the Ministry’s (The Trusted News Initiative) jurisdiction.

The harsh repercussions that media outlets, specialists, scientists, and anybody who dared to write or tell the truth had to endure were as follows:

  • Loss of livelihood: News organizations that failed to comply with the Ministry of Truth’s standards were defunded and smeared in an attempt to shut them down.

    While scientists and experts who challenged the official narrative lost their jobs or were prevented from publishing their research.
  • Harassment and intimidation: The Ministry of Truth also used its power to intimidate and harass individuals who challenged the official narrative.

    This included sending threatening messages, spreading false information about them online, or even physically stalking or attacking them.

The Ministry of Truth’s (TheTrusted News Initiative) strategy was quite effective in preventing the dissemination of accurate information that jeopardized their attempts to completely dominate the information landscape.

Experts and scientists were effectively kept in the dark, with any research or conclusions that didn’t support the government’s version of events about COVID-19 being labeled as “fake news.”

It also resulted in a culture where people were reluctant to express their opinions, where governments exercised excessive control over what people knew and believed, and where freedom of expression and independent thought were suppressed.

The Ministry only provided the public with material it deemed to be “true,” although frequently this meant withholding crucial information that may have saved lives.

Millions of lives were tragically and needlessly lost as a result of the Covid-19 injections.


While Europe saw 382k excess deaths in 2021 and 309k excess deaths by November 2022, the US experienced over 700k excess deaths in 2021 and an additional 360k excess deaths by November 11th 2022. Ukraine is not included in these statistics.

In Australia, there were only 1,303 extra deaths in 2020, but after the Covid-19 vaccine was introduced, there were 11,042 extra deaths, an increase of 747 percent.

In Australia, there were 18,973 excess fatalities by the end of July 2022, a rise of 1,356% from the previous year. This is an excess of deaths in 7 months more than in the two years prior put together.


In the US, 1,700 more people died by week 38 of 2022 compared to week 38 of 2020, and 109k more died by week 38 of 2021 compared to week 38 of 2020.

These numbers prove that deaths increased rather than decreased following the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.


According to the Centers for Disease Control and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, there were over 1 million excess deaths in the US between 2021 and November 2022.

While official figures from EuroMOMO, provided by 28 European countries including the UK, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, show over 690k excess deaths in Europe by November 2022.

Australia, Canada, and New Zealand also had significant numbers of excess deaths, though their overall populations are smaller.


In total, the “Five Eyes” and most of Europe had 1,103,592 excess deaths in 2021 and 716,133 excess deaths by November 2022.

This adds up to over 1.8 million excess deaths since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.


This data is contrary to the official narrative that the vaccination is secure and efficient and will lower the death rate. And based on these numbers alone, it appears that the Covid-19 vaccinations are mostly to blame for the increased mortality rates in the “Five Eyes” and Europe.

But data that the UK government surreptitiously released but did not publicly announce make the aforementioned assertion unquestionably true.

The population of England was more likely to die of any cause than the population who had not received any vaccinations as of May 2022, the most recent month for which data were available. This was true for all age categories.

This demonstrates that the Covid-19 injections have caused excess deaths and still do.

Click to enlarge

Due to the above figures (which can be viewed in detail broken down by age here) being age-standardized and rates per 100,000 population, they are indisputable evidence that the Covid-19 injections increase the risk of death and are killing people.

These are just a few of the unfortunate effects that the public has had to endure since the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and the UK Government established the Ministry of Truth, also known as The Trusted News Initiative, in 2019.

The issue is that the Ministry of Truth still exists and that it continues to gain power and control over information.

We must all continue to be alert in defending freedom of speech and individual rights since there are still dangers associated with censorship and the silencing of dissenting voices.

The establishment of a Ministry of Truth has devastating results. And it is more important than ever that we defend people’s freedom to express their own thoughts and points of view.

We must maintain our vigilance and refrain from making the same mistakes again out of fear and control.



  1. Ricci

    July 16, 2023 at 10:50 pm

    If the face masks worked,
    why the 6ft?
    If the 6ft works,
    why the masks?
    If both worked ,
    why the lockdown?
    If all three worked,
    why the vaccines?
    If the vaccines are safe,
    why the “No Liability ” clause?

  2. Emily A.

    July 25, 2023 at 2:00 pm

    Hey Webmaster,

    I hope this email finds you rocking your day! I couldn’t help but notice your awesome website and thought I’d reach out as a Social Media Manager who could take your online presence to the next level.

    You know, social media engagement is a powerhouse when it comes to attracting new customers, boosting sales, and ramping up your website traffic. It’s like having a 24/7 virtual cheerleader promoting your business!

    As a social media whiz, I’ve got the skills to make it happen for you. Here’s how I can work my magic:

    – I will Do 1 post/ day for 30 Days
    – I will create customized Graphics
    – Ensure Full Engagement
    – Do Trending Hashtags Outreach
    – Do Attractive Copywriting
    – Do Scheduling Platforms
    – Drive Organic Web Traffic 
    – Do Competition Analysis
    – Do Market Research
    – 24/7 support
    – Fast Delivery


    – Facebook
    – Instagram
    – Twitter
    – Pinterest
    – LinkedIn

    Ready for some epic social media success? Check out my portfolio here –


  3. Marian Viney

    July 29, 2023 at 10:52 am

    Are you a small to medium business looking to grow your customer base? Do you want to increase your exposure and generate traffic?

    Look no further than email marketing.

    There are a number of ways to do it, but the easiest is with our automation tool.

    It is dead simple. Sign up here for a free account –

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Big Tech Censorship

Elon Musk Threatens Legal Action Over ‘Advertising Boycott Racket’ Targeting Right-Leaning Media



Elon Musk threatened legal action on Thursday against an alliance of major companies, accusing them of participating in an “advertising boycott racket” that has exacerbated a revenue decline at his social media platform, X.

Musk, who acquired the company formerly known as Twitter for $44 billion in 2022, made the announcement in response to a video of Daily Wire founder Ben Shapiro’s Congressional testimony. Shapiro’s testimony addressed alleged collusion by advertisers against right-leaning platforms.

“Having seen the evidence unearthed today by Congress, X has no choice but to file suit against the perpetrators and collaborators in the advertising boycott racket,” Musk wrote on X. “Hopefully, some states will consider criminal prosecution.”

Elon Musk’s threat follows Shapiro’s testimony before a House Judiciary panel during a hearing entitled “Collusion in the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM).” GARM, an initiative by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), aims to tackle harmful content on digital media platforms and its monetization through advertising. WFA’s members, including Disney, Coca-Cola, Toyota, and Hershey, represent nearly 90% of global advertising spending, amounting to almost $1 trillion annually.

During the hearing, Shapiro and lawmakers focused on the conduct of GARM chief Robert Rakowitz. An interim House staff report highlighted Rakowitz’s questionable behavior, including an internal email from February 9, 2023, where Rakowitz appeared to boast about X being “80% below revenue forecasts” after GARM’s challenges on brand safety issues. Rakowitz claimed the email was a “self-effacing joke.”

The House report also unveiled biases against conservative media. An email exchange from October 2021 between Rakowitz and John Montgomery, EVP of global brand safety at GroupM, the world’s largest media buying agency, discussed blocking certain news outlets like Fox News, The Daily Wire, and Breitbart News. Montgomery admitted, “As much as we hated their ideology and bulls—t, we couldn’t really justify blocking them for misguided opinion,” but noted that they monitored these outlets closely and acted when they “crossed the line.”

In light of these revelations, Musk has urged for both civil and criminal repercussions. “Hopefully, some states will consider criminal prosecution,” Musk stated, highlighting the severity of the alleged collusion.

Representatives for GARM, GroupM, and X did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Musk’s post. Shapiro, in his opening statement shared by Musk, called on Congress to address what he termed as “censorship cartels like GARM and executive branch agencies” that oppose conservative views. The subcommittee is currently evaluating whether existing civil and criminal penalties, along with antitrust law enforcement efforts, are adequate to deter anti-competitive collusion in online advertising.

This development underscores the growing tension between major tech platforms, advertisers, and political entities over content moderation and free speech. Musk’s aggressive stance signals a potential legal battle that could have significant implications for the future of digital advertising and media bias.

As the situation evolves, the spotlight remains on whether the legal threats will materialize and how they might influence the practices of global advertisers and media platforms.

Continue Reading


Journalist threatened with jail for publishing trans shooter Audrey Hale’s deranged journal writings



A journalist from the Tennessee Star is being summoned to appear in court and faces jail time for publishing journal writings of transgender shooter Audrey Hale, sparking freedom of the press concerns.

The article revealed that Hale, who shot and killed six people at the Covenant Elementary School in March 2023, wrote about her ‘imaginary penis’ and how she would ‘kill’ to get puberty blockers weeks before her horrific act.

For more than a year, Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles has been presiding over a public records case wherein the plaintiffs are suing to get the right to release documents related to the shooting. Families of the victims are on the exact opposite side, trying to bury the documents and keep them out of the public eye.

But since the case is ongoing, Myles is claiming that the Tennessee Star may have published ‘certain purported documents and information’ that should have remained under seal.

At Myle’s request, Tennessee Star editor-in-chief Michael Patrick Leahy will appear in court Monday to explain why his news outlet didn’t violate the court order.

Michael Patrick Leahy, CEO of Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief of the Tennessee Star
Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles, who’s been presiding over the public records fight over Audrey Hale’s manifesto
Michael Patrick Leahy, left, is the CEO of Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief of the Tennessee Star. Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles has ordered Leahy to appear in court because of the Star’s reporting on Audrey Hale’s journal writings.

Leahy, who also serves as CEO of Star News Digital Media, publisher of the Tennessee Star, claims his outlet has done nothing wrong throughout the course of its reporting.

The Star has claimed a June 5 story didn’t actually publish any of the leaked images of her journal entries but just snippets from it, reported the Associated Press.

‘This could raise First Amendment issues,’ said Deborah Fisher, Tennessee Coalition for Open Government’s executive director.

Jeff Clark, a former US attorney, also sided with Leahy, saying he was just doing a journalist’s job and getting crucial information about the shooting.

Leahy ‘is in jeopardy in Tennessee state court for trying to get out the Covenant Killer Audrey Hale’s “manifesto.” And presumably other info about her,’ Clark wrote on X.

‘The American people deserve to know the details of how Hale was radicalized by the trans agenda. And the victims’ family especially deserve to learn that information.’

Hale, 28, was a transgender artist, who identified as a male named Aiden, shot her way into the Tennessee elementary school in March 2023, killing three adults and three nine-year-olds, before responding officers killed her.

Officers found her writings in the car she drove to the elementary school, and the Star reported on ‘nearly four dozen images of notebook pages written by Hale’ provided by a source familiar with the investigation.

Hale wrote about anger toward her parents, how she hated her conservative Christian upbringing, and how she had suffered because hormone blockers were not available when she was a child.

One of her entries was ‘My Imaginary Penis’ and included a crude drawing, according to the Tennessee Star.

‘My penis exists in my head. I swear to god I’m a male,’ Hale wrote in the papers.

She then wrote about her desire to have a penis so she could have sex with a woman, in her assumed identity as Aiden.

She wrote about how using that name on a job application for a delivery position led to issues with the company’s background check.

Hale also said that being raised as a girl was ‘torture.’

She worried that high school classmates would call her ‘dyke or a f*‘, she wrote.

That all changed when she learned about transgenderism in her early 20s.

‘I finally found the answer — that changing one’s gender is possible,’ wrote Hale.

After the Star’s reporting throughout June, the Nashville’s Metropolitan Police said in a statement that ‘it is concerned about the alleged leak, and we, like others, would like to know from where it came.’

Immediately following the shooting, Nashville’s police chief John Drake said Hale’s manifesto as well as the hand-drawn maps found in her car would eventually be made public.

Now, despite the leaks, both city police and the FBI say the material shouldn’t be released because the information could damage any potential investigation.

In a statement to The Center Square, Leahy said he plans to defend his and his outlet’s rights to publish relevant information about the shooting.

‘Yes, I intend to appear in court on Monday at 11 am, along with my attorneys, Nick Barry with America First Legal and Daniel Horwitz, a nationally recognized First Amendment attorney based here in Nashville,’ Leahy told The Center Square Sunday.

Continue Reading


Alex Jones Ordered to Liquidate Personal Assets to Pay Sandy Hook Debt



A federal judge has ordered the liquidation of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ personal assets to help pay the $1.5 billion debt he owes for his false claims that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax. This decision was made on Friday, while the judge is still considering the bankruptcy case of Jones’ company, Free Speech Systems, which owns the Infowars media platform.

Judge Christopher Lopez approved the conversion of Jones’ proposed personal bankruptcy reorganization to a liquidation. Jones’ personal assets, including his Texas ranch valued at about $2.8 million and a gun collection, will be sold off to pay debts. However, his primary home in the Austin area and some other belongings are exempt from the liquidation.

The fate of Free Speech Systems is still uncertain. If the company is also liquidated, Jones would lose control of Infowars, including its studios, equipment, social media accounts, and copyrights. A bankruptcy trustee would oversee the liquidation process. The Sandy Hook families are also seeking to take control of Jones’ personal social media accounts, which he opposes.

The legal battles stem from Jones’ false claims that the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, which killed 20 first graders and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut, was a hoax. Relatives of the victims won lawsuit judgments totaling more than $1.4 billion in Connecticut and $49 million in Texas. These families have testified about the harassment and threats they faced from Jones’ followers, some of whom claimed the shooting never happened.

The Sandy Hook families’ lawyers argue that liquidating Free Speech Systems would allow them to enforce their judgments and prevent Jones from continuing to inflict harm through his broadcasts. Chris Mattei, a lawyer for the families in the Connecticut case, stated that the liquidation would “deprive Jones of the ability to inflict mass harm as he has done for some 25 years.”

Jones and Free Speech Systems initially filed for bankruptcy reorganization protection, which would have allowed Jones to continue running Infowars while using revenue to pay the families. However, the parties could not agree on a final plan, leading to the current push for liquidation.

Jones has been vocal about his belief that the legal actions against him are part of a conspiracy by Democrats and the “deep state” to shut down his companies and silence his free speech. He has also accused the Sandy Hook families of being used as pawns in this alleged conspiracy.

The Sandy Hook families have a pending lawsuit in Texas accusing Jones of illegally diverting and hiding millions of dollars, allegations which Jones denies. As the legal proceedings continue, the future of Infowars and Jones’ ability to continue his broadcasts remains uncertain.

Continue Reading