Connect with us

Biden Administration

Rutgers to Kick Out Students Today Who Don’t Comply With Covid Vaccine Mandates

Published

on

Out of 2,679 four-year colleges and institutions, only a handful, including Rutgers, continue to enforce COVID-19 vaccine requirements. According to unnamed sources, Rutgers is preparing to drop non-compliant students starting today.

Maybe it’s been a long time coming for this rigid devotion to COVID-19 vaccine regulations. Rutgers had among of the harshest pandemic lockdown regulations in 2020 and 2021, even as other institutions were figuring out how to get back to business as usual.

Students soon lined up, and anyone who objected to the lockdown or mask requirements was branded a grandmother killer and an anti-science MAGA (Make America Great Again) supporter.

An ex-student of Rutgers University described her experience as being trapped in a storm of fear, partisanship, and social pressure that made her self-censor rather than risk connections or lose respect in her beloved community.

Pandemic anxieties swiftly turned into rage as the vaccine started to be distributed in early 2021 against anyone who dared to raise concerns about the vaccine’s necessity, safety, or long-term repercussions. The topic of vaccines was brought up in dozens of classroom discussions.

If it was acceptable for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to declare that the vaccines were not preventing us from contracting the virus and mainstream media was reporting on it, why wasn’t Rutgers supporting its students so they could feel safe? Support for the vaccine mandate was seen as virtue and altruism, and anyone who had questions quickly learned to keep their mouths shut or else they would be given the dreaded anti-vaxxer label.

Rutgers, in the meantime, maintained to its community members that no one was had to get immunized because they may ask for an exemption. They did not publicize the fact that exemptions were scarce. Most religious exemptions were rejected.

If ever, medical exemptions were given after many months and numerous appeals.

The University did provide a 90-day extension on booster compliance based on a recent COVID-19 infection, but this extension could only be requested once, and any requests for medical exemptions based on positive antibody titers from earlier COVID-19 infections were rejected.

An ex-Rutgers student spoke about his request for a booster exemption following serious cardiac problems.

It was made clear to him that antibody titers had no bearing. After several back and forths, his cardiologist’s formal request for a medical exemption was ultimately rejected.

Apparently, despite new information showing that COVID-19 vaccines can have cardiac side effects, especially in young males, the Rutgers Immunization Group—a secretive group in charge of handling exemptions—decided that this young man’s cardiac issues were not a good enough reason to exempt him from a booster.

The federal Executive Order 14042, which was signed on September 9, 2021, required that employees of federally contracted businesses, including research universities like Rutgers, be immunized against COVID-19. As a result, faculty and staff people at Rutgers may have had it harder than students.

Despite the fact that a booster requirement was not included in the federal law, Rutgers announced a booster requirement for all members of the community, including employees, on January 4, 2022.

Some employees—all of whom had completed their primary vaccinations and were largely COVID-19-recovered—reported receiving threatening letters directing them to comply with the booster requirement, warning them that failure to do so would result in discipline, up to and including termination of employment, but specifically termination.

While the Executive Order allowed for exclusions for religious or medical reasons, the exemptions were extremely challenging to obtain. As a result, many workers obeyed grudgingly, and several were made to resign.

Even though the management bemoaned the university’s chronic labor scarcity, the employee vaccination mandate’s oppressiveness prevented many potential employees from accepting career-changing employment offers at Rutgers.

Rutgers’ justification for imposing a COVID-19 vaccination requirement on its employees was eliminated on May 12 when President Joe Biden signed an executive order cancelling Executive Order 14042.

Rutgers removed the booster requirement four days later, but the COVID-19 vaccine requirement for employees is still in place.

Rutgers is one of a small handful of universities that has stubbornly maintained COVID-19 vaccine mandates as of this writing, in August, months after the federal government declared the end of the public health emergency.

Biden Administration

U.S. Announces $725 Million Military Aid Package for Ukraine

Published

on

Washington, D.C. — The United States is poised to deliver an additional $725 million in military aid to Ukraine, signaling continued support for Kyiv’s efforts to defend against Russian aggression. The latest package, confirmed by two U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity, includes counter-drone systems and munitions for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).

Notably, the package raises questions about whether it includes the coveted Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), a longer-range missile that Ukraine has repeatedly requested to target deeper into Russian-controlled territory. However, the officials declined to confirm whether ATACMS would be included.

In addition to munitions, the aid package features anti-personnel landmines, which Ukraine is using to counter Russian and North Korean ground forces, particularly in contested areas like Russia’s Kursk region.

President Joe Biden remains resolute in using all funds allocated by Congress for Ukraine’s military support before the end of his administration in January. Before Monday’s announcement, approximately $7.1 billion in military assistance had been provided, drawn from Pentagon stockpiles.

While the Biden administration continues to bolster Ukraine, questions loom about the incoming Trump administration’s approach to the conflict. President-elect Trump h as promised to “end the conflict,” potentially signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward Ukraine.

In a noteworthy development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested last week that NATO membership for Ukrainian-controlled territories could help end the “hot stage of the war.” This remark signals a potential softening in Ukraine’s stance as it seeks to balance territorial integrity with international support.

HIMARS munitions have been a linchpin in Ukraine’s defense strategy, enabling precision strikes on Russian targets. The possible inclusion of ATACMS in this package could extend Ukraine’s reach, putting more strategic Russian positions at risk. Meanwhile, the addition of counter-drone systems underscores the escalating drone warfare in the region, as both sides employ drones for surveillance and strikes.

The use of anti-personnel landmines reflects Ukraine’s tactical efforts to slow Russian advancements, particularly in areas where conventional defense lines have proven difficult to maintain.

The aid announcement comes amid heightened speculation about U.S. foreign policy under the incoming Trump administration. While President Biden has championed robust support for Ukraine, critics argue the ongoing assistance risks overextending U.S. resources. Trump’s pledge to “end the conflict” could signify a more isolationist approach, raising concerns among Ukraine’s allies about the continuity of U.S. support.

As the war grinds on, Ukraine remains reliant on Western military aid to sustain its defenses and reclaim lost territory. The latest U.S. package underscores Washington’s strategic commitment, even as domestic and international pressures mount.

Whether the new administration will maintain this trajectory remains uncertain, but for now, the U.S. remains a steadfast partner in Ukraine’s fight for sovereignty.

SOURCE: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

U.S. Government Has Sent $239 Million to Taliban Since 2021 Due to State Dept’s Vetting Failures, Report Reveals

Published

on

The U.S. government has inadvertently sent at least $239 million to the Taliban in development assistance since 2021, according to a new report. The oversight occurred because the State Department failed to properly vet award recipients.

Less than a year after it was reported that the Taliban established fake nonprofits to siphon millions of dollars in U.S. aid to Afghanistan, a new investigation by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reveals that the terrorist group has received hundreds of millions in development assistance due to inadequate vetting by the State Department. Since the 2021 U.S. military withdrawal, at least $239 million have likely filled the Taliban’s coffers.

The State Department’s divisions known as Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) and International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) disbursed the funds to implement development projects aimed at supporting American foreign policy and national security goals in Afghanistan.

Investigators found that the State Department failed to comply with its own counterterrorism partner vetting requirements before awarding at least 29 grants to various local entities. The agency has a system in place to identify whether prospective awardees have a record of ethical business practices and is supposed to conduct risk assessments to determine if programming funds may benefit terrorists or terrorist-affiliates before distributing American taxpayer dollars. However, in the more than two dozen cases examined, the agency neglected these procedures and failed to maintain proper records.

“Because DRL and INL could not demonstrate their compliance with State’s partner vetting requirements, there is an increased risk that terrorist and terrorist-affiliated individuals and entities may have illegally benefited from State spending in Afghanistan,” the SIGAR report states. “As State continues to spend U.S. taxpayer funds on programs intended to benefit the Afghan people, it is critical that State knows who is actually benefiting from this assistance in order to prevent the aid from being diverted to the Taliban or other sanctioned parties, and to enable policymakers and other oversight authorities to better scrutinize the risks posed by State’s spending.”

The watchdog identified issues with 29 awards distributed by DRL and INL. For instance, DRL failed to properly screen the recipients of seven awards totaling about $12 million. INL did not provide any supporting documentation for 19 of its 22 awards totaling about $295 million, making it impossible to determine if they complied with vetting requirements. The State Department acknowledged that not all its bureaus have complied with document retention requirements, complicating the assessment of the magnitude of its transgressions. INL cited “employee turnover and the dissolution of the Afghanistan-Pakistan office” as reasons for not retaining records.

Given the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021, SIGAR emphasized the importance of U.S. government activities adhering to laws, regulations, and policies intended to prevent transactions with terrorists.

Besides establishing fraudulent non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to loot significant portions of the $3 billion in humanitarian aid the U.S. has provided Afghanistan since the Biden administration’s abrupt military withdrawal, the Taliban has also accrued millions by charging taxes, permit fees, and import duties. This money has flowed through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a State Department arm known for its corruption, which received $63.1 billion for foreign assistance and diplomatic engagement this year. Additionally, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the government’s international broadcasting service, also disbursed funds.

The United Nations has received $1.6 billion in U.S. funding for Afghanistan, and a significant percentage of that money likely went to the Taliban, according to a federal audit. The U.S. government does not require the UN to report on taxes, fees, or duties incurred on American funds for activities in Afghanistan, further complicating accountability.

SOURCE: SIGAR REPORT

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

US Announces $1.7 Billion in New Security Assistance for Ukraine

Published

on

The United States announced on Monday a new tranche of military aid for Ukraine valued at approximately $1.7 billion. This package includes critical air defense munitions and artillery rounds that Ukrainian forces have urgently requested.

The assistance package comprises $200 million in equipment drawn from existing U.S. military stocks, ensuring rapid deployment to the battlefield. Additionally, it includes around $1.5 billion in new orders, which will take longer to reach Ukraine, according to a statement from the Defense Department.

Key Components of the Aid Package

The new security assistance will provide Ukraine with:

  • Various types of air defense munitions to shield against Russian strikes
  • Artillery rounds
  • Ammunition for HIMARS precision rocket launchers
  • Multiple types of anti-tank weapons
  • Other crucial capabilities

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed deep gratitude in a social media post, thanking U.S. President Joe Biden, the U.S. Congress, and the American people for their continued support. Zelensky emphasized that the aid includes items “critical to strengthening Ukrainian defenders, as well as funding to sustain previously committed equipment from the United States.”

Zelensky visited special forces in the border region of Kharkiv on Monday. Moscow’s forces launched a surprise ground offensive in this region in May but failed to make significant progress. The Ukrainian leader observed firsthand how the ongoing assistance from the U.S. helps to save lives and protect citizens from Russian attacks.

The United States has been a pivotal military supporter of Ukraine, committing over $55 billion in weapons, ammunition, and other security assistance since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Before late April, Washington had announced limited new aid for Ukraine this year, with only a $300 million package made possible through Pentagon savings on other purchases. After months of intense debate, Congress finally approved large-scale funding for Kyiv in April, authorizing $95 billion in aid, including $61 billion specifically for Ukraine.

Despite the new aid, Ukrainian forces are facing significant challenges. On Monday, Russia claimed its forces had captured the village of Vovche in eastern Ukraine, marking the latest in a series of front-line advances by Moscow.

The Ukrainian military reported that it had repelled six Russian attacks on the Kharkiv front line over the past day, including at Vovchansk, a small town that Russian forces have targeted since May. As the conflict grinds through its third year, neither side has managed to gain a decisive advantage, although Moscow’s forces have made recent gains.

Continue Reading

Trending