In roughly 5,400 emails, electronic records, and documents during his time as vice president, President Joe Biden may have used a pseudonym, according to a shocking letter from the National Archives and Records Administration.
The abundance of correspondence was verified after the Southeastern Legal Foundation (SLF) requested emails associated with aliases reportedly used by Biden, including Robin Ware, Robert L. Peters, and JRB Ware, under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Republicans have pushed for the release of emails they claim indicate Biden used the aliases to communicate with his son about international business and share information on the nations where he was making deals.
Vice presidents and other high-ranking government officials sometimes adopt pseudonyms to avoid being overwhelmed with spam and unsolicited emails from the general public, despite the White House’s insistence that Biden and his son were never partners in business.
Because all of the communications were stored, the Obama administration at the time denied claims that they were’secret’.
The question of whether then-VP Biden breached the “absolute wall” he claimed to have maintained between “the personal and private, and the government,” however, is raised by the sheer volume of emails.
Emails found on Hunter’s laptop also show that Biden was referred to as the “big guy” by business associates.
According to NARA, there are around 5,400 emails, electronic data, and documents that show Joe Biden utilized email aliases while serving as Obama’s vice president.
Employees used Biden’s alternate address. To arrange a meeting with Petro Poroshenko, use the email address Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov. Hunter received a copy of that email.
Hunter also urged John McGrail to apply for a position in the Treasury’s legal division in an email to Robin Ware, another of Biden’s email aliases.
The results of the FOIA request made by the SLF in June 2022 seem to corroborate that Biden used the emails associated with the identities.
From a variety of personal email accounts, Biden occasionally sent, received, and forwarded official correspondence.
All of the names are aliases that Biden used on emails pertaining to both professional and personal matters from 2009 to 2017 while he was Barack Obama’s vice president.
On Monday, the Southeastern Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit against NARA to force the release of the records.
The Foundation claims that the documents could possibly show occasions in which President Biden communicated with his son, Hunter Biden, and other people about official business.
‘All too frequently, public servants abuse their authority by utilizing it for their own political or personal gain. Many people try to conceal it when they do. The best way to maintain the integrity of the government is for NARA to make Biden’s approximately 5,400 emails available to SLF and the general public.
Kimberly Hermann, general attorney for the SLF, stated in a statement, “The American public deserves to know what is in them.”
In addition, the Southeastern Legal Foundation claims that NARA has been using delay strategies since the initial FOIA request was made more than 14 months ago.
NARA has acknowledged the existence of emails, but no specific emails have been released.
According to the lawsuit, Stephannie Oriabure, director of NARA’s archival operations division, wrote to the Southeastern Legal Foundation in June 2022, “We have performed a search of our collection for Vice Presidential records related to your [June 9, 2022] request and have identified approximately 5,138 email messages, 25 electronic files, and 200 pages of potentially responsive records that must be processed in order to respond to your request.”
James Comer, a Kentucky Republican and the head of the House Oversight Committee, ordered from NARA earlier this month unredacted papers that also demonstrated Vice President Biden’s use of a pseudonym.
On that particular occasion, the goal was to investigate the part the former vice president played in his son’s cross-border commercial transactions.
As previously revealed emails from Hunter Biden’s laptop showed, while serving as vice president, President Biden used the email account “Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov.”
The emails also showed conversations between Hunter Biden and his assistant on Joe Biden’s daily itinerary.
John Flynn’s assistant sent Biden his daily schedule to his personal email address, Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov, along with a copy to Hunter for at least four weeks in 2016.
Hunter gave his small son the name Beau after his sibling. They joined Joe and First Lady Jill Biden at the White House for the July 4 fireworks display.
Between May 18 and June 15, 2016, Hunter was copied on 10 of these emails.
Robert Peters used a @pci.gov domain for his email account. In 2020, the Domain Name System security report from the DNS Institute classified the service as problematic.
A May 2016 email from Flynn to Joe, a.k.a. Robert Peters, that also included Hunter in the recipient list, sets a “8.45am prep for 9am phonecall with Pres Poroshenko.” Poroshenko was the president of Ukraine.
Hunter was receiving $83,333 per month at the time to serve on the board of the dishonest Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings Ltd.
A year and a half after beginning his employment with Burisma, he ultimately quit the company two months after his father’s resignation as vice president.
Only a few months prior, in December 2015, Biden had threatened Poroshenko that he would withhold $1 billion in US funding unless he dismissed Viktor Shokin, Ukraine’s chief prosecutor, who was looking into Mykola Zlochevsky, the owner of Burisma.
Shokin was ousted from office in March 2016 after receiving numerous accusations of wrongdoing.
According to emails found on Hunter Biden’s laptop, Joe Biden would email his two sons, Hunter (on the left) and Beau (on the right), using the aliases “Robin Ware,” “Robert L. Peters,” and “JRB ware.” At Obama’s Inaugural Parade in January 2009, the couple was captured on camera.
Officials from the State Department allegedly tried to complain to Biden directly about Hunter’s participation with Burisma, but their accusations were dismissed.
On March 26, 2012, Joe Biden sent a forwarded email to Hunter and his brother Beau, who was the attorney general of Delaware, using one of his private aliases, RobinWare456@gmail.com.
Email from Antony Blinken, who is currently serving as secretary of state, was forwarded.
‘Beau visited Kyev [Ukraine] on the Friday and gave a discussion on corruption at the Hyatt… then attended reception at the residence where he met many young Ukrainian lawyers,’ read the email from US Ambassador to Ukraine John Tefft. We got a lot of praise for his speech and just being honest about a subject that still affects this nation.
In 2014, Hunter began working for Ukrainian gas producer Burisma Holdings.
From Burisma, he received $83,333 per month until two months after Biden’s resignation.
In an email from a Ukrainian executive at Burisma, who stated that he had access to him through Hunter, he was referred to as “the big guy” and characterized.
Because the executive was also under investigation by a Ukrainian prosecutor, Joe’s use of $1 billion in American aid funds to remove the prosecutor generated severe concerns.
In the past, President Biden has denied ever granting any of Hunter’s business colleagues access to him or the White House.
Rep. Comer noted that while Biden has long maintained that there was a total separation between the commercial ventures of his family and his duties as vice president, the evidence appears to imply otherwise.
‘Joe Biden has claimed there was ‘an absolute wall’ between his family’s overseas business operations and his duties as Vice President, but evidence demonstrates that access was wide open for his family’s influence peddling,’ Comer noted in a statement on August 17.
“The National Archives must provide these unredacted records,” he continued. “They will help us in our investigation into the corruption of the Biden family.”
White House officials transmitted Joe’s calendar, including a conversation with the then-Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko, to his secret email account, “Robert L. Peters,” according to a troubling May 2016 email that Comer’s letter mentions and that DailyMail.com previously reported.
Hunter, who at the time was supposedly working for the fraudulent Ukrainian gas company Burisma, was mysteriously copied on the email by the staff member John Flynn.
According to documents found on Joe’s laptop, White House employees copied Hunter on a total of 10 emails sent to alias addresses.
Another instance occurred in June 2014 where Joe and Hunter appeared to have used the then-VP’s private email to discuss official business.
On June 23, 2014, Hunter wrote to his father via his Rosemont Seneca consultant email account regarding the hiring of John McGrail, who was then the deputy White House counsel.
Hunter wrote, “J. McGrail very much wants to serve as detail for Treasury. Before you fill position, pls talk to me.”
Joe replied from the email robinware456@gmail.com, “Re: Johnny, call me right away Dad.”
McGrail received his anticipated transfer to the Treasury as Senior Counsel in January 2017 after being elevated to VP’s counsel the following year. According to his LinkedIn profile, he is the department’s Under Secretary for Domestic Finance’s Counselor at the moment.
Since 2021, Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson have been requesting from NARA unredacted data pertaining to Joe’s pseudonym emails.
Additionally, Anthony Blinken utilized the Robin Ware email to inform his superior about a speech Beau gave in Kyiv in 2012 when he was serving as Biden’s national security adviser.
Washington, D.C. — The United States is poised to deliver an additional $725 million in military aid to Ukraine, signaling continued support for Kyiv’s efforts to defend against Russian aggression. The latest package, confirmed by two U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity, includes counter-drone systems and munitions for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
Notably, the package raises questions about whether it includes the coveted Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), a longer-range missile that Ukraine has repeatedly requested to target deeper into Russian-controlled territory. However, the officials declined to confirm whether ATACMS would be included.
In addition to munitions, the aid package features anti-personnel landmines, which Ukraine is using to counter Russian and North Korean ground forces, particularly in contested areas like Russia’s Kursk region.
President Joe Biden remains resolute in using all funds allocated by Congress for Ukraine’s military support before the end of his administration in January. Before Monday’s announcement, approximately $7.1 billion in military assistance had been provided, drawn from Pentagon stockpiles.
While the Biden administration continues to bolster Ukraine, questions loom about the incoming Trump administration’s approach to the conflict. President-elect Trump h as promised to “end the conflict,” potentially signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward Ukraine.
In a noteworthy development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested last week that NATO membership for Ukrainian-controlled territories could help end the “hot stage of the war.” This remark signals a potential softening in Ukraine’s stance as it seeks to balance territorial integrity with international support.
HIMARS munitions have been a linchpin in Ukraine’s defense strategy, enabling precision strikes on Russian targets. The possible inclusion of ATACMS in this package could extend Ukraine’s reach, putting more strategic Russian positions at risk. Meanwhile, the addition of counter-drone systems underscores the escalating drone warfare in the region, as both sides employ drones for surveillance and strikes.
The use of anti-personnel landmines reflects Ukraine’s tactical efforts to slow Russian advancements, particularly in areas where conventional defense lines have proven difficult to maintain.
The aid announcement comes amid heightened speculation about U.S. foreign policy under the incoming Trump administration. While President Biden has championed robust support for Ukraine, critics argue the ongoing assistance risks overextending U.S. resources. Trump’s pledge to “end the conflict” could signify a more isolationist approach, raising concerns among Ukraine’s allies about the continuity of U.S. support.
As the war grinds on, Ukraine remains reliant on Western military aid to sustain its defenses and reclaim lost territory. The latest U.S. package underscores Washington’s strategic commitment, even as domestic and international pressures mount.
Whether the new administration will maintain this trajectory remains uncertain, but for now, the U.S. remains a steadfast partner in Ukraine’s fight for sovereignty.
The U.S. government has inadvertently sent at least $239 million to the Taliban in development assistance since 2021, according to a new report. The oversight occurred because the State Department failed to properly vet award recipients.
Less than a year after it was reported that the Taliban established fake nonprofits to siphon millions of dollars in U.S. aid to Afghanistan, a new investigation by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reveals that the terrorist group has received hundreds of millions in development assistance due to inadequate vetting by the State Department. Since the 2021 U.S. military withdrawal, at least $239 million have likely filled the Taliban’s coffers.
The State Department’s divisions known as Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) and International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) disbursed the funds to implement development projects aimed at supporting American foreign policy and national security goals in Afghanistan.
Investigators found that the State Department failed to comply with its own counterterrorism partner vetting requirements before awarding at least 29 grants to various local entities. The agency has a system in place to identify whether prospective awardees have a record of ethical business practices and is supposed to conduct risk assessments to determine if programming funds may benefit terrorists or terrorist-affiliates before distributing American taxpayer dollars. However, in the more than two dozen cases examined, the agency neglected these procedures and failed to maintain proper records.
“Because DRL and INL could not demonstrate their compliance with State’s partner vetting requirements, there is an increased risk that terrorist and terrorist-affiliated individuals and entities may have illegally benefited from State spending in Afghanistan,” the SIGAR report states. “As State continues to spend U.S. taxpayer funds on programs intended to benefit the Afghan people, it is critical that State knows who is actually benefiting from this assistance in order to prevent the aid from being diverted to the Taliban or other sanctioned parties, and to enable policymakers and other oversight authorities to better scrutinize the risks posed by State’s spending.”
The watchdog identified issues with 29 awards distributed by DRL and INL. For instance, DRL failed to properly screen the recipients of seven awards totaling about $12 million. INL did not provide any supporting documentation for 19 of its 22 awards totaling about $295 million, making it impossible to determine if they complied with vetting requirements. The State Department acknowledged that not all its bureaus have complied with document retention requirements, complicating the assessment of the magnitude of its transgressions. INL cited “employee turnover and the dissolution of the Afghanistan-Pakistan office” as reasons for not retaining records.
Given the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021, SIGAR emphasized the importance of U.S. government activities adhering to laws, regulations, and policies intended to prevent transactions with terrorists.
Besides establishing fraudulent non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to loot significant portions of the $3 billion in humanitarian aid the U.S. has provided Afghanistan since the Biden administration’s abrupt military withdrawal, the Taliban has also accrued millions by charging taxes, permit fees, and import duties. This money has flowed through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a State Department arm known for its corruption, which received $63.1 billion for foreign assistance and diplomatic engagement this year. Additionally, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the government’s international broadcasting service, also disbursed funds.
The United Nations has received $1.6 billion in U.S. funding for Afghanistan, and a significant percentage of that money likely went to the Taliban, according to a federal audit. The U.S. government does not require the UN to report on taxes, fees, or duties incurred on American funds for activities in Afghanistan, further complicating accountability.
The United States announced on Monday a new tranche of military aid for Ukraine valued at approximately $1.7 billion. This package includes critical air defense munitions and artillery rounds that Ukrainian forces have urgently requested.
The assistance package comprises $200 million in equipment drawn from existing U.S. military stocks, ensuring rapid deployment to the battlefield. Additionally, it includes around $1.5 billion in new orders, which will take longer to reach Ukraine, according to a statement from the Defense Department.
Key Components of the Aid Package
The new security assistance will provide Ukraine with:
Various types of air defense munitions to shield against Russian strikes
Artillery rounds
Ammunition for HIMARS precision rocket launchers
Multiple types of anti-tank weapons
Other crucial capabilities
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed deep gratitude in a social media post, thanking U.S. President Joe Biden, the U.S. Congress, and the American people for their continued support. Zelensky emphasized that the aid includes items “critical to strengthening Ukrainian defenders, as well as funding to sustain previously committed equipment from the United States.”
Zelensky visited special forces in the border region of Kharkiv on Monday. Moscow’s forces launched a surprise ground offensive in this region in May but failed to make significant progress. The Ukrainian leader observed firsthand how the ongoing assistance from the U.S. helps to save lives and protect citizens from Russian attacks.
The United States has been a pivotal military supporter of Ukraine, committing over $55 billion in weapons, ammunition, and other security assistance since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.
Before late April, Washington had announced limited new aid for Ukraine this year, with only a $300 million package made possible through Pentagon savings on other purchases. After months of intense debate, Congress finally approved large-scale funding for Kyiv in April, authorizing $95 billion in aid, including $61 billion specifically for Ukraine.
Despite the new aid, Ukrainian forces are facing significant challenges. On Monday, Russia claimed its forces had captured the village of Vovche in eastern Ukraine, marking the latest in a series of front-line advances by Moscow.
The Ukrainian military reported that it had repelled six Russian attacks on the Kharkiv front line over the past day, including at Vovchansk, a small town that Russian forces have targeted since May. As the conflict grinds through its third year, neither side has managed to gain a decisive advantage, although Moscow’s forces have made recent gains.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login