Connect with us

Trending

Dead JP Morgan Executive, Reportedly Vowed To Expose Biden Crimes

Published

on

Senior JP Morgan board member and billionaire, James Crown reportedly vowed to expose damning evidence regarding financial crimes involving Joe and Hunter Biden before his unexpected death from “blunt force trauma” in Colorado from a car accident.

Investigators confirmed that James Crown, a businessman and former intelligence agent who was once considered part of Barack Obama’s “inner circle”, was killed on Sunday, the day of his 70th birthday, following a “car accident.”

Crown’s death was quickly ruled an accident by the coroner in Pitkin County and the investigation has been closed down.

James Crown’s death follows the recent settlement of JP Morgan Chase involving Epstein victims, which claim they helped enable Epstein’s illegal activities.

This follows whistleblower Dr. Gal Luft, the co-director of the Washington-based Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, which reportedly was going to reveal explosive information on the Biden Crime Family, who has gone missing.

Right before he was disappeared, Luft’s lawyer had told Biden’s DOJ that his client would submit a letter to Congress containing information Luft previously gave to the FBI during the Trump Administration on the Bidens.

Moreover, The New York Post revealed that Luft was in possession of explosive information: someone was selling sealed U.S. law enforcement information to Chinese individuals.

The attorney claimed that Ye Jianming, founder and chairman of CEFC-USA, a nonprofit created by the China Energy Fund Committee, told Luft that Hunter Biden had an informant in the FBI. They paid a lot of money to provide sealed law enforcement information.

This FBI mole was reportedly called “One-Eye.”

Luft appeared to be on the verge of blowing the lid off the investigation into the Biden Crime Family’s business deals. But something very convenient happened this month that redounded to the family’s benefit.

So what did James Crown, the JP Morgan executive and member of the Obama inner circle, know about Biden? According to JP Morgan insiders, it’s more likely a case of what James Crown didn’t know.

The Biden crime family has been intimately tied to the organized crime cartel JP Morgan for decades.

Make no mistake, JP Morgan is one of the world’s biggest crime cartels, protected by the mainstream media and delicately intertwined with the globalist elite and protected from prying eyes by the mainstream media.

In June 2019 a ship owned by JP Morgan Chase was was seized in a $1.3 billion cocaine bust.

In May this year, Jeffrey Epstein emails released to the public revealed the influence that the convicted pedophile had over JP Morgan executives as well as celebrities including Bill Gates and political elites.

And also in May, former JP Morgan banking chief Jes Staley was accused

 of ‘aggressively’ raping an underage Jeffrey Epstein victim “with his permission.”

The US Virgin Islands also announced last month that they couldn’t find Google co-founder Larry Page to subpoena him in a lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase for “enabling Epstein’s sex-trafficking ring.”

Wherever you find corrupt international finance and degenerate sex, you will find Joe and Hunter Biden, and they have been intimately connected to the mess of sordid JP Morgan criminality for decades. So closely tied, in fact, that US Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George, who vowed to continue seeking justice for victims of Jeffrey Epstein by exposing his collaborators, was fired while Joe Biden paid an unscheduled visit to the islands in January.

If you are having flashbacks to how Biden had Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin fired for investigating Burisma Energy, you are not the only one.

On December 27, then-Virgin Islands Attorney General Denise George filed a blistering and heavily redacted 30-page lawsuit against JP Morgan Chase, accusing the bank of having “facilitated, sustained, and concealed” Epstein’s human trafficking network.

Apparently this was serious enough for Biden to make a highly irregular visit to the US Virgin Islands on Air Force One on New Years Day.

Days later, George was terminated from her role as AG. And the mainstream media was ordered to look the other way and convince the public there was nothing to see here.

And in 2019 a grand jury subpoena ordered JP Morgan to provide testimony and documents about an array of Hunter Biden’s business dealings – as well as information in its files about the president’s brother, James.

The subpoena, which came amid Joe Biden’s presidential campaign, listed a number of Hunter Biden’s business ventures, including the Rosemont Seneca partnership he formed.

The the letter to JP Morgan identifies the Bank of China as the ‘Originating or Beneficiary Bank’ on the letter. 

Which is very interesting considering Biden was caught on hot mic this weekend boasting to the president of India that he has sold a lot of state secrets to foreign interests.

Everytime Biden is caught on a hot mic saying something deeply incriminating, the mainstream media leap to his rescue and make excuses for him.

Apparently, Biden admitting to another world leader that he has taken advantage of his role by selling state secrets is just another “gaffe.”

84 Comments

84 Comments

  1. Richard C Abbott

    June 29, 2023 at 9:20 am

    Looks like RFK jr. might find himself in a unexpected accident

  2. riteqiqskt

    July 3, 2023 at 5:49 pm

    Dead JP Morgan Executive, Reportedly Vowed To Expose Biden Crimes
    riteqiqskt http://www.gv66f4e7015p04ni2fit258g5o8hkub8s.org/
    ariteqiqskt
    [url=http://www.gv66f4e7015p04ni2fit258g5o8hkub8s.org/]uriteqiqskt[/url]

  3. Haircuts

    July 4, 2023 at 4:47 pm

    Please let me know if you’re looking for a writer for your site. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d love to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please send me an e-mail if interested. Many thanks!

  4. Haircuts

    July 4, 2023 at 6:18 pm

    Almost all of whatever you say happens to be supprisingly accurate and it makes me ponder the reason why I had not looked at this with this light previously. This article really did turn the light on for me as far as this subject matter goes. Nonetheless at this time there is actually 1 factor I am not really too comfortable with and whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the core idea of the point, let me observe what all the rest of your visitors have to point out.Very well done.

  5. Hairstyles

    July 4, 2023 at 8:16 pm

    Terrific work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the net. Shame on Google for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my site . Thanks =)

  6. Beauty Fashion

    July 5, 2023 at 4:40 pm

    Greetings from Ohio! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your site on my iphone during lunch break. I really like the info you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my mobile .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, excellent blog!

  7. Hairstyles

    July 5, 2023 at 7:23 pm

    I am so happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this best doc.

  8. Hairstyles

    July 5, 2023 at 9:52 pm

    Hi there are using WordPress for your blog platform? I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and set up my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to make your own blog? Any help would be really appreciated!

  9. Celebrities

    July 6, 2023 at 1:58 pm

    Excellent web site. Plenty of useful info here. I am sending it to some friends ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks for your effort!

  10. Hairstyles

    July 7, 2023 at 3:50 pm

    What i don’t realize is actually how you are now not actually much more well-appreciated than you may be now. You’re very intelligent. You already know thus considerably when it comes to this subject, made me for my part consider it from numerous varied angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be involved unless it抯 something to do with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs outstanding. At all times take care of it up!

  11. Fashion

    July 8, 2023 at 5:25 pm

    Great weblog here! Additionally your site a lot up fast! What web host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link in your host? I want my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

  12. LifeStyle

    July 9, 2023 at 3:29 pm

    I have seen many useful things on your web page about computer systems. However, I’ve the view that netbooks are still more or less not powerful sufficiently to be a sensible choice if you generally do things that require plenty of power, including video croping and editing. But for website surfing, microsoft word processing, and quite a few other typical computer work they are just great, provided you may not mind the small screen size. Thanks for sharing your notions.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Biden Administration

Kamala Harris Allegedly Covered Up Biden’s Mental Decline, Democratic Source Says

Published

on

SACRAMENTO, CA — Former Los Angeles Mayor and current California gubernatorial candidate Antonio Villaraigosa has publicly alleged that Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra were involved in concealing former President Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline during his time in office.

Villaraigosa, a Democrat, made the claim amid a heated California gubernatorial race. Becerra, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, is also a candidate, while speculation continues over a potential Harris bid. The race comes as current Governor Gavin Newsom reaches the end of his second and final term, per California’s two-term limit.

In a statement referencing recent reporting and excerpts from the book Original Sin, Villaraigosa stated:

“What I’ve seen in news coverage and excerpts from the new book ‘Original Sin’ is deeply troubling. At the highest levels of our government, those in power were intentionally complicit or told outright lies in a systematic cover up to keep Joe Biden’s mental decline from the public.”

Both Harris and Becerra previously served as California Attorney General. Villaraigosa emphasized their past leadership roles, stating:

“Now, we have come to learn this cover up includes two prominent California politicians who served as California Attorney General – one who is running for Governor and another who is thinking about running for Governor.”

He added:

“Those who were complicit in the cover up should take responsibility for the part they played in this debacle, hold themselves accountable, and apologize to the American people. I call on Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra to do just that – and make themselves available to voters and the free press because there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.”

Becerra responded in a statement, saying:

“It’s clear the President was getting older, but he made the mission clear: run the largest health agency in the world, expand care to millions more Americans than ever before, negotiate down the cost of prescription drugs, and pull us out of a world-wide pandemic. And we delivered.”

Kamala Harris has not issued a public response. Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to the offices of Harris and the Bidens but had not received a reply at the time of publication.

The allegations come as discussions about Biden’s cognitive and physical health continue. Earlier this month, during an appearance on The View, Biden dismissed claims of cognitive decline during his presidency.

In related developments, Biden’s personal office recently confirmed that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a high Gleason score and metastasis to the bone.

Villaraigosa’s comments are the latest in a growing list of concerns raised within the Democratic Party about leadership transparency and accountability in the final years of the Biden administration.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Biden Officials Accused of Delaying Public Warning on COVID-19 Vaccine Heart Risks, Senate Report Alleges

Published

on

A newly released interim report from Senator Ron Johnson’s office claims top U.S. health officials in the Biden administration withheld critical information in early 2021 about potential heart-related side effects associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The 54-page report alleges that despite receiving multiple warnings about the risks—particularly cases of myocarditis and related conditions in young people—federal agencies delayed issuing formal alerts for several months.

According to the report, health officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were informed as early as February 2021 about international concerns, including an attempt by Israel’s Ministry of Health to raise alarm over roughly 40 myocarditis cases tied to the Pfizer vaccine. At that time, Israel’s vaccination campaign was further along than the U.S.’s, offering an early view of potential adverse effects.

In response to Israel’s outreach, FDA officials acknowledged limitations in existing data and asked for further information. However, despite growing domestic reports of heart inflammation—more than 158 cases by April—the agencies did not formally update the public until late June. The vaccine was nonetheless approved for adolescents in May.

By late May, internal deliberations began over whether to issue a Health Alert Network (HAN) message, which is typically used by the CDC to quickly notify clinicians and public health departments of emerging health threats. Some officials reportedly feared sounding “alarmist.” Others questioned whether the data truly warranted a full-scale warning. Ultimately, the HAN alert was shelved in favor of a more subdued website notice issued on May 28.

In the interim, internal talking points continued to describe the condition as rare and urged continued vaccination. The official FDA label for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines wasn’t updated to reflect the myocarditis risk until June 25.

The report, while critical, notes that many individuals who developed myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis after vaccination experienced a resolution of symptoms, a finding consistent with CDC data.

Senator Johnson, a frequent critic of the federal pandemic response, has argued that transparency was lacking during this period. “The full extent of the Biden administration’s failure to immediately warn the public about all COVID-19 vaccine adverse events must be completely exposed,” the report concludes.

Health officials involved in the decisions, including then-FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock and then-CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, have not yet publicly responded to the findings in the interim report.

The release comes amid ongoing political scrutiny over pandemic-era decision-making and the future of public health communications in the wake of COVID-19. The Biden administration and health agencies have consistently maintained that the benefits of mRNA vaccines outweigh the risks, particularly during the height of the pandemic when COVID-19 posed a significant public health threat.

As investigations continue, Johnson’s subcommittee says it plans to further examine the internal communications and decision-making processes of the nation’s top health agencies.

Continue Reading

Big Pharma

Abortion Pill Complications 22X Higher Than Previously Reported, Per New Study

Published

on

By

A newly released analysis is raising serious questions about the safety profile of mifepristone, the drug responsible for over half of abortions in the United States. While abortion-rights advocates, corporate media outlets, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) maintain that the drug is “safe and effective,” a comprehensive study based on real-world insurance claims paints a far more concerning picture.

Described as the “largest known study of the abortion pill,” the report was conducted by Ethics and Public Policy Center President Ryan Anderson and Director of Data Analysis Jamie Bryan Hall. Using a massive dataset that included Medicaid, TRICARE, Medicare, Department of Veterans Affairs, and private insurance claims, the researchers analyzed 865,727 prescriptions of mifepristone distributed to 692,873 women between 2017 and 2023.

The findings are striking: approximately 10.9 percent of those chemical abortions—about 94,605 cases—involved potentially life-threatening “serious adverse events” within 45 days of taking the drug. These complications included emergency room visits, hemorrhage, sepsis, infection, and follow-up surgeries. This complication rate is at least 22 times higher than the <0.5 percent figure cited by the FDA on the Mifeprex label.

The researchers noted that some patients experienced complications in multiple categories, and that the 45-day window used for measurement was “conservative,” especially considering that the FDA has relied on studies using a timeframe of up to 72 days.

One chart from the study revealed that among women who sought post-abortion care within 45 days:

  • 15.1% visited the emergency room,
  • 8.5% required surgical treatment,
  • 2.5% experienced hemorrhage,
  • 1.9% suffered infections, and
  • 0.9% were diagnosed with sepsis.

“These outcomes were drawn from actual claims data,” the researchers emphasized, “not modeled projections or self-reported surveys.” In Anderson’s words to The Federalist: “This study is the statistical equivalent of a category 5 hurricane hitting the prevailing narrative of the abortion industry. It reveals, based on real-world data, the shocking number of women who suffer serious medical consequences because of the abortion pill.”

The FDA originally approved mifepristone in 2000 based on 10 clinical trials involving only 30,966 patients—women who were described as “prescreened,” “generally healthy,” and treated in controlled environments. The authors of the new study argue that those trials are both outdated and unrepresentative of today’s broad and diverse patient base.

“The women in our dataset receive (or fail to receive) pre- and post-abortion healthcare of the real-world quality that prevails in the U.S. today, not the carefully controlled regimen of care that ordinarily prevails in a clinical trial,” the study says.

Despite repeated petitions from pro-life medical groups to revisit the approval of mifepristone, the FDA has consistently declined to take action. Critics argue the agency failed to meet its legal obligation to address the concerns. Meanwhile, regulatory oversight has continued to loosen. By 2016, the FDA under the Obama administration had altered the drug’s dosing, cut down the number of in-person doctor visits required, broadened who could prescribe it, and eliminated requirements to report non-fatal complications.

The Biden administration went further. In 2021, the FDA permanently allowed mifepristone to be delivered by mail, bypassing the need for a clinic visit. Pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS were later authorized to dispense the pill. As of 2023, a woman can obtain mifepristone with just one telehealth appointment with “any approved healthcare provider (not necessarily a physician)” and self-administer the drug at home. Alarmingly, prescribers are not required to report adverse events unless they learn the patient has died.

The study recommends that the FDA reinstate its original safety protocols. These would include requiring multiple in-person visits, physician-only prescribing, ultrasound confirmation of gestational age and the absence of ectopic pregnancy, and mandatory reporting of complications. The goal, according to the authors, is not only to reduce immediate harm but also to facilitate better long-term safety tracking.

“The FDA should further investigate the harm this drug causes to women and, based on objective safety criteria, reconsider its approval altogether. Women deserve better than the abortion pill,” the study concludes.

While legal efforts to challenge the pill’s availability have so far been unsuccessful, the issue remains live. In 2023, the Supreme Court declined to weigh in on the merits of mifepristone’s approval, ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s opinion left open the possibility for the Court to consider a more suitable challenge in the future.

SOURCE: THE FEDERALIST

Continue Reading

Trending

Top 10 Online Casinos in Österreich