A journalist from the Tennessee Star is being summoned to appear in court and faces jail time for publishing journal writings of transgender shooter Audrey Hale, sparking freedom of the press concerns.

The article revealed that Hale, who shot and killed six people at the Covenant Elementary School in March 2023, wrote about her ‘imaginary penis’ and how she would ‘kill’ to get puberty blockers weeks before her horrific act.

For more than a year, Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles has been presiding over a public records case wherein the plaintiffs are suing to get the right to release documents related to the shooting. Families of the victims are on the exact opposite side, trying to bury the documents and keep them out of the public eye.

But since the case is ongoing, Myles is claiming that the Tennessee Star may have published ‘certain purported documents and information’ that should have remained under seal.

At Myle’s request, Tennessee Star editor-in-chief Michael Patrick Leahy will appear in court Monday to explain why his news outlet didn’t violate the court order.

Michael Patrick Leahy, CEO of Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief of the Tennessee Star
Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles, who’s been presiding over the public records fight over Audrey Hale’s manifesto
Michael Patrick Leahy, left, is the CEO of Star News Digital Media and editor-in-chief of the Tennessee Star. Nashville Chancellor I’Ashea Myles has ordered Leahy to appear in court because of the Star’s reporting on Audrey Hale’s journal writings.

Leahy, who also serves as CEO of Star News Digital Media, publisher of the Tennessee Star, claims his outlet has done nothing wrong throughout the course of its reporting.

The Star has claimed a June 5 story didn’t actually publish any of the leaked images of her journal entries but just snippets from it, reported the Associated Press.

‘This could raise First Amendment issues,’ said Deborah Fisher, Tennessee Coalition for Open Government’s executive director.

Jeff Clark, a former US attorney, also sided with Leahy, saying he was just doing a journalist’s job and getting crucial information about the shooting.

Leahy ‘is in jeopardy in Tennessee state court for trying to get out the Covenant Killer Audrey Hale’s “manifesto.” And presumably other info about her,’ Clark wrote on X.

‘The American people deserve to know the details of how Hale was radicalized by the trans agenda. And the victims’ family especially deserve to learn that information.’

Hale, 28, was a transgender artist, who identified as a male named Aiden, shot her way into the Tennessee elementary school in March 2023, killing three adults and three nine-year-olds, before responding officers killed her.

Officers found her writings in the car she drove to the elementary school, and the Star reported on ‘nearly four dozen images of notebook pages written by Hale’ provided by a source familiar with the investigation.

Hale wrote about anger toward her parents, how she hated her conservative Christian upbringing, and how she had suffered because hormone blockers were not available when she was a child.

One of her entries was ‘My Imaginary Penis’ and included a crude drawing, according to the Tennessee Star.

‘My penis exists in my head. I swear to god I’m a male,’ Hale wrote in the papers.

She then wrote about her desire to have a penis so she could have sex with a woman, in her assumed identity as Aiden.

She wrote about how using that name on a job application for a delivery position led to issues with the company’s background check.

Hale also said that being raised as a girl was ‘torture.’

She worried that high school classmates would call her ‘dyke or a f*‘, she wrote.

That all changed when she learned about transgenderism in her early 20s.

‘I finally found the answer — that changing one’s gender is possible,’ wrote Hale.

After the Star’s reporting throughout June, the Nashville’s Metropolitan Police said in a statement that ‘it is concerned about the alleged leak, and we, like others, would like to know from where it came.’

Immediately following the shooting, Nashville’s police chief John Drake said Hale’s manifesto as well as the hand-drawn maps found in her car would eventually be made public.

Now, despite the leaks, both city police and the FBI say the material shouldn’t be released because the information could damage any potential investigation.

In a statement to The Center Square, Leahy said he plans to defend his and his outlet’s rights to publish relevant information about the shooting.

‘Yes, I intend to appear in court on Monday at 11 am, along with my attorneys, Nick Barry with America First Legal and Daniel Horwitz, a nationally recognized First Amendment attorney based here in Nashville,’ Leahy told The Center Square Sunday.

A federal judge has ordered the liquidation of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ personal assets to help pay the $1.5 billion debt he owes for his false claims that the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting was a hoax. This decision was made on Friday, while the judge is still considering the bankruptcy case of Jones’ company, Free Speech Systems, which owns the Infowars media platform.

Judge Christopher Lopez approved the conversion of Jones’ proposed personal bankruptcy reorganization to a liquidation. Jones’ personal assets, including his Texas ranch valued at about $2.8 million and a gun collection, will be sold off to pay debts. However, his primary home in the Austin area and some other belongings are exempt from the liquidation.

The fate of Free Speech Systems is still uncertain. If the company is also liquidated, Jones would lose control of Infowars, including its studios, equipment, social media accounts, and copyrights. A bankruptcy trustee would oversee the liquidation process. The Sandy Hook families are also seeking to take control of Jones’ personal social media accounts, which he opposes.

The legal battles stem from Jones’ false claims that the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, which killed 20 first graders and six educators in Newtown, Connecticut, was a hoax. Relatives of the victims won lawsuit judgments totaling more than $1.4 billion in Connecticut and $49 million in Texas. These families have testified about the harassment and threats they faced from Jones’ followers, some of whom claimed the shooting never happened.

The Sandy Hook families’ lawyers argue that liquidating Free Speech Systems would allow them to enforce their judgments and prevent Jones from continuing to inflict harm through his broadcasts. Chris Mattei, a lawyer for the families in the Connecticut case, stated that the liquidation would “deprive Jones of the ability to inflict mass harm as he has done for some 25 years.”

Jones and Free Speech Systems initially filed for bankruptcy reorganization protection, which would have allowed Jones to continue running Infowars while using revenue to pay the families. However, the parties could not agree on a final plan, leading to the current push for liquidation.

Jones has been vocal about his belief that the legal actions against him are part of a conspiracy by Democrats and the “deep state” to shut down his companies and silence his free speech. He has also accused the Sandy Hook families of being used as pawns in this alleged conspiracy.

The Sandy Hook families have a pending lawsuit in Texas accusing Jones of illegally diverting and hiding millions of dollars, allegations which Jones denies. As the legal proceedings continue, the future of Infowars and Jones’ ability to continue his broadcasts remains uncertain.

The Intercept, once heralded as a bastion of fearless and adversarial journalism, now finds itself embroiled in controversy as allegations surface of the suppression of critical stories and the erosion of its founding principles. At the center of this storm is a series of incidents where stories were allegedly held back or altered due to concerns from management, of donor displeasure, highlighting a troubling trend within the organization.

One such story revolves around a leaked membership list for the secretive Bohemian Grove, a private gentlemen’s club known for its influential membership. Despite efforts to verify the authenticity of the document, The Intercept’s management, led by the digital security manager Nikita Mazurov, expressed unwarranted concerns about source protection and potential repercussions. The story, which promised to shed light on the club’s influential members, was ultimately abandoned, leaving questions unanswered and truths obscured.

The new revelation, which comes about thanks to Ken Klippenstein who exposed The Intercept, a renowned investigative outlet, for suppressing a groundbreaking story about the secretive Bohemian Grove. The story, obtained by journalist Daniel Boguslaw from a leaked membership list, promised to unveil the inner workings of the exclusive club, which boasts business tycoons and former top officials like Henry Kissinger among its members.

However, The Intercept’s management, led by digital security manager Nikita Mazurov, halted the story’s publication, citing concerns about source protection. Despite Boguslaw’s assurance that the document had been obtained over a year ago from a trusted source, Mazurov treated it as if it were classified intelligence, demanding additional verification before publication.

In a bizarre turn of events, Mazurov posed outlandish hypothetical scenarios during a call with Boguslaw and editor Bill, questioning the legitimacy of the leaked document. His inquiries, likened to something out of a spy thriller, included speculations about alternate lists and CCTV footage, prompting an incredulous response from Bill.

Frustrated by the bureaucratic hurdles imposed by The Intercept’s management, Bill ultimately made the decision to abandon the story, much to Boguslaw’s disappointment. However, Boguslaw expressed admiration for Bill’s defiance against the stifling influence of officious bureaucrats within the organization.

This revelation sheds light on the challenges faced by journalists in navigating the increasingly complex landscape of digital security and source protection. It also raises concerns about the erosion of editorial independence and the stifling of investigative reporting within media organizations. As journalists strive to uncover the truth and hold power to account, it is imperative that they are supported by institutions committed to upholding the principles of transparency and press freedom.

Another instance involved a story detailing Jeff Bezos’s charitable contributions, which was initially met with resistance from The Intercept’s general counsel due to concerns about offending billionaire donors. Despite pushback from editorial staff, including threats of resignation, the story was ultimately published. However, the process exposed tensions within the organization and raised doubts about its commitment to independent journalism.

These incidents are indicative of a broader editorial crisis within The Intercept, where the pursuit of truth and accountability appears to be increasingly overshadowed by corporate interests and bureaucratic concerns. The organization’s shift away from its founding mission of holding power to account raises troubling questions about its future direction and integrity.

As journalists like Ken Klippenstein depart in search of more independent platforms, The Intercept faces a reckoning over its editorial decisions and journalistic values. The suppression of critical stories undermines public trust and erodes the credibility of an outlet once hailed for its uncompromising reporting. In an era of rampant misinformation and corporate influence, the need for fearless and adversarial journalism has never been greater. The Intercept must confront these challenges head-on and reaffirm its commitment to truth, transparency, and the public interest.

You can find more of Ken’s work here: https://www.kenklippenstein.com/