Connect with us

Government Accountability

Pelosi’s Top Security Aides Got Warning About Capitol Breach Night Before Jan. 6 Riot, Memos Show

Published

on

Two top House security aides under then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi received stark warnings from police the night before the January 6 riots, indicating that protesters might try to breach the U.S. Capitol through its tunnel systems and block lawmakers from voting to certify Joe Biden’s presidential election win. This information comes from newly obtained memos and text messages.

The documents obtained by Just the News also confirm that Pelosi’s team played a role in the botched security planning for that fateful day.

“We have identified numerous open source comments indicating groups’ intentions of finding the tunnel entrances and confronting/blocking the MOCs (Members of Congress),” Capitol Police Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher wrote in an email to Deputy House Sergeant at Arms Tim Blodgett at 8:55 p.m. on January 5, 2021. This email was forwarded overnight to Blodgett’s boss, then-Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving.

A second warning was sent later that evening about possible threats against Supreme Court justices. The sergeant-at-arms office scheduled a briefing for Pelosi’s then-chief of staff Terri McCullough the next morning, hours before the breach occurred, according to the messages obtained by House Administration Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Barry Loudermilk.

Congressional investigators believe the texts and emails may explain why Pelosi, in a recently surfaced video shot by her daughter as they were fleeing the Capitol on January 6, claimed responsibility for security failures that day despite her public denials.

“We have responsibility, Terri,” Pelosi is heard saying on the videotape to McCullough. “We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have. … I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more.”

Loudermilk told Just the News that his committee plans to question Pelosi’s staff about what was meant on the videotape and how they reacted to the emailed warnings from Capitol Police.

“I think it was clear at that moment. She understood. They messed up. She or her staff are the ones who denied the request by Chief (Steven) Sund for the National Guard,” he told the “Just the News, No Noise” television show.

“There’s a lot of information that people on Pelosi’s staff I think need to answer, some questions. So we’re wrapping up some other areas while we’re still going down this path,” Loudermilk added.

The U.S. Capitol Police did not respond to a request for comment from Just the News. Former Sergeant at Arms Irving could not be reached for comment.

Pelosi and House Democrats have repeatedly denied blame for not accepting an offer from then-President Donald Trump’s administration to have National Guard pre-posted at the Capitol to augment police security, suggesting that security decisions were left to the sergeant of arms and Capitol Police. Pelosi’s staff doubled down on those claims in a statement to Just the News.

“Numerous independent fact-checkers have confirmed again and again that Pelosi did not plan her own assassination on January 6th. The Speaker of the House is not in charge of the security of the Capitol Complex – on January 6th or any other day of the week,” a spokesperson for Nancy Pelosi told Just the News.

However, the new emails, text messages, and documents obtained by Just the News show that in the days leading up to January 6, 2021, Pelosi’s office was involved in Capitol security planning, receiving requests for edits and feedback and being kept informed of the security situation by Irving.

That pattern continued until the day of the Capitol riot. A series of text messages show that Pelosi’s chief of staff, McCullough, was in contact with Irving for updates in the days leading up to and on the morning of January 6. According to the Congressional Research Service, the Sergeant at Arms operates “under the direction of the Speaker” to maintain order and decorum in the House. He is also responsible for Capitol security and the safety of members alongside his Senate counterpart.

“Paul – when is a good time to talk about this afternoon and the floor tomorrow?” McCullough asked in one email.

“I need a few minutes. How about after 6:15 pm this evening, or of course anytime tomorrow morning,” Irving replied.

The new communications were not referenced in the Democrat-led January 6 Select Committee’s report on the events leading up to, during, and after the Capitol breach. A Capitol Police Inspector General flash report in the aftermath discusses the failure for intelligence to be widely disseminated but does not provide any specifics—though much of this section of the report is redacted.

The lone references to any communications with Pelosi’s staff came in a 2022 report issued by Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind. Loudermilk’s staff then formally obtained the communications from Capitol Police.

The emails show that McCullough was active in providing feedback from the Speaker’s office on January 6 security plans. Two days before the Joint Session of Congress to certify the Electoral College votes, McCullough received an email from Irving’s office forwarding a letter it planned to send to all House members. The communication shows that Pelosi’s office had the opportunity to make edits to the information and provide suggestions about the content of the letter.

“Terri / Jamie — Please see the attached DRAFT Dear Colleague regarding security information for January 6 Joint Session. Please let us know if you have any edits, comments or concerns,” Kathleen Joyce from the Sergeant at Arms office wrote. The records show that McCullough responded with suggestions, which were incorporated in the final letter draft.

That “dear colleague” letter was sent out to all members and their staff on the same day, with the suggested edits from Pelosi’s office included.

The security preparations for the certification seemed to be proceeding smoothly until the night of January 5 when the Capitol Police began forwarding intelligence warnings to Irving raising concerns about safety and interruptions of the count.

At 8:55 PM on January 5, the day before the riot, Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher emailed Sergeant at Arms officials to warn them of an “Interest in Tunnels Leading to the US Capitol.” This email was forwarded to Irving at 1:59 AM on January 6 by his deputy Blodgett.

“Meant to send this earlier today, but got tied up, we are running this out, but there is a historical website called WashingtonTunnels.com that has a bunch of information, to include maps on our Capitol system tunnels. The owner of the website submitted an online tip to the FBI National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) stating that he noticed a significant uptick in new visitors to his website,” Gallagher wrote.

“We have identified numerous open source comments indicating groups intentions of finding the tunnel entrances and confronting/blocking the MOCs. In addition, they specifically discuss attempting to get into the LOC to go to the basement and use the LOC tunnel to get to the Capitol,” he added. The LOC refers to the Library of Congress, through which access to the Capitol can be had.

He also described a “huge uptick with reporting via open source” of a group’s plan to try and form a perimeter around the Capitol to prevent members of Congress from reaching the building. Gallagher concluded his email by informing the staff that the department would continue to monitor the intelligence.

Just the News previously reported that a top aide to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Kelly Fado, received a similar email from Gallagher pointing to the potential danger, though this information was not distributed to the then-Chief of the Capitol Police nor any of the frontline officers tasked with protecting the Capitol that day.

At 3:30 AM on January 6, the deputy sergeant at arms, Blodgett, forwarded a separate warning to Irving, according to the emails, this time about chatter online that indicated a specific group called the Red State Secession was collecting addresses for Supreme Court Justices. Though no members of Congress were mentioned, the Capitol Police warned that they were monitoring the group.

“Wanted to bring to your awareness, there is a website called Red State Secession that has posted an article requesting that users submit addresses of residences and offices of politicians/judges/lobbyist,” Gallagher wrote.

“It is possible that the group may have similar action plans for Members of Congress, we have added this site to our daily monitoring for mention/listing of any MOC,” he added.

Text messages show that Irving was in contact with Pelosi’s chief of staff the following morning for a briefing, making it likely that she—and Pelosi’s office—was made aware of the potential threats.

“Good morning Paul. Let me know a good time to connect this morning,” McCullough said in a text message to Irving.

Irving replied that he would get back with her “shortly.”

In June, new footage of Pelosi on January 6 was released by the House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight that showed the then-Speaker believed she had at least some responsibility for what had just happened, Just the News reported. The footage was recorded by Pelosi’s daughter Alexandra, who helped HBO shoot a documentary about the January 6 riot.

“We have responsibility, Terri,” Pelosi exclaimed to her chief of staff, McCullough, at the beginning of the short video. “We did not have any accountability for what was going on there, and we should have,” Pelosi said. “This is ridiculous.”

“You’re going to ask me — in the middle of the thing when they’ve already breached the inaugural stuff — ‘should we call the Capitol Police, I mean the National Guard?’” she added. “Why weren’t the National Guard there to begin with?”

“They thought that they had sufficient…resources” her chief of staff, McCullough, replied as the Speaker’s SUV raced through an underground parking garage.

“No, that’s not a question of how they had… they don’t know. They clearly didn’t know. And I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for more

SOURCE: JUST THE NEWS

Biden Administration

Kamala Harris Allegedly Covered Up Biden’s Mental Decline, Democratic Source Says

Published

on

SACRAMENTO, CA — Former Los Angeles Mayor and current California gubernatorial candidate Antonio Villaraigosa has publicly alleged that Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra were involved in concealing former President Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline during his time in office.

Villaraigosa, a Democrat, made the claim amid a heated California gubernatorial race. Becerra, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, is also a candidate, while speculation continues over a potential Harris bid. The race comes as current Governor Gavin Newsom reaches the end of his second and final term, per California’s two-term limit.

In a statement referencing recent reporting and excerpts from the book Original Sin, Villaraigosa stated:

“What I’ve seen in news coverage and excerpts from the new book ‘Original Sin’ is deeply troubling. At the highest levels of our government, those in power were intentionally complicit or told outright lies in a systematic cover up to keep Joe Biden’s mental decline from the public.”

Both Harris and Becerra previously served as California Attorney General. Villaraigosa emphasized their past leadership roles, stating:

“Now, we have come to learn this cover up includes two prominent California politicians who served as California Attorney General – one who is running for Governor and another who is thinking about running for Governor.”

He added:

“Those who were complicit in the cover up should take responsibility for the part they played in this debacle, hold themselves accountable, and apologize to the American people. I call on Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra to do just that – and make themselves available to voters and the free press because there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.”

Becerra responded in a statement, saying:

“It’s clear the President was getting older, but he made the mission clear: run the largest health agency in the world, expand care to millions more Americans than ever before, negotiate down the cost of prescription drugs, and pull us out of a world-wide pandemic. And we delivered.”

Kamala Harris has not issued a public response. Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to the offices of Harris and the Bidens but had not received a reply at the time of publication.

The allegations come as discussions about Biden’s cognitive and physical health continue. Earlier this month, during an appearance on The View, Biden dismissed claims of cognitive decline during his presidency.

In related developments, Biden’s personal office recently confirmed that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a high Gleason score and metastasis to the bone.

Villaraigosa’s comments are the latest in a growing list of concerns raised within the Democratic Party about leadership transparency and accountability in the final years of the Biden administration.

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

Biden Officials Accused of Delaying Public Warning on COVID-19 Vaccine Heart Risks, Senate Report Alleges

Published

on

A newly released interim report from Senator Ron Johnson’s office claims top U.S. health officials in the Biden administration withheld critical information in early 2021 about potential heart-related side effects associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. The 54-page report alleges that despite receiving multiple warnings about the risks—particularly cases of myocarditis and related conditions in young people—federal agencies delayed issuing formal alerts for several months.

According to the report, health officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were informed as early as February 2021 about international concerns, including an attempt by Israel’s Ministry of Health to raise alarm over roughly 40 myocarditis cases tied to the Pfizer vaccine. At that time, Israel’s vaccination campaign was further along than the U.S.’s, offering an early view of potential adverse effects.

In response to Israel’s outreach, FDA officials acknowledged limitations in existing data and asked for further information. However, despite growing domestic reports of heart inflammation—more than 158 cases by April—the agencies did not formally update the public until late June. The vaccine was nonetheless approved for adolescents in May.

By late May, internal deliberations began over whether to issue a Health Alert Network (HAN) message, which is typically used by the CDC to quickly notify clinicians and public health departments of emerging health threats. Some officials reportedly feared sounding “alarmist.” Others questioned whether the data truly warranted a full-scale warning. Ultimately, the HAN alert was shelved in favor of a more subdued website notice issued on May 28.

In the interim, internal talking points continued to describe the condition as rare and urged continued vaccination. The official FDA label for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines wasn’t updated to reflect the myocarditis risk until June 25.

The report, while critical, notes that many individuals who developed myocarditis, pericarditis, or myopericarditis after vaccination experienced a resolution of symptoms, a finding consistent with CDC data.

Senator Johnson, a frequent critic of the federal pandemic response, has argued that transparency was lacking during this period. “The full extent of the Biden administration’s failure to immediately warn the public about all COVID-19 vaccine adverse events must be completely exposed,” the report concludes.

Health officials involved in the decisions, including then-FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock and then-CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, have not yet publicly responded to the findings in the interim report.

The release comes amid ongoing political scrutiny over pandemic-era decision-making and the future of public health communications in the wake of COVID-19. The Biden administration and health agencies have consistently maintained that the benefits of mRNA vaccines outweigh the risks, particularly during the height of the pandemic when COVID-19 posed a significant public health threat.

As investigations continue, Johnson’s subcommittee says it plans to further examine the internal communications and decision-making processes of the nation’s top health agencies.

Continue Reading

Government Accountability

Sen. Marsha Blackburn Demands FBI, IRS Release Full Epstein Records, Surveillance Footage

Published

on

Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) is ramping up pressure on the FBI and IRS to release unredacted records related to Jeffrey Epstein, insisting the public deserves full transparency regarding his associates and financial dealings.

In a letter addressed to newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel and acting IRS Commissioner Douglas O’Donnell, Blackburn, 72, demanded the agencies provide “complete, unredacted records” regarding Epstein, including flight logs, surveillance footage, and financial documents.

“This critical information identifying every individual who could have participated in Jeffrey Epstein’s abhorrent conduct is long overdue,” Blackburn wrote. “The survivors of Mr. Epstein’s horrific crimes want transparency and accountability, and they—and the American people—deserve nothing less.”

Epstein, a disgraced financier with high-profile connections, was arrested in July 2019 on federal child sex trafficking charges. He was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell a month later, with the official ruling being suicide. His death has fueled years of speculation and demands for answers regarding his extensive network of associates.

Demands for Full Disclosure

Blackburn is specifically seeking the unredacted flight logs from Epstein’s private jet and helicopter, along with his convicted associate Ghislaine Maxwell’s records, including the infamous “little black book.” Additionally, she is calling for the release of surveillance footage from Epstein’s Palm Beach residence, which was allegedly a hub for his illicit activities.

While redacted versions of these documents have previously surfaced online or been included in lawsuits, Blackburn argues that the full versions must be made public. “Since Mr. Epstein’s death in 2019, there is still much about this tragic case that is not known—including the names of his associates that are listed in the flight logs of his private jet and in Ghislaine Maxwell’s ‘little black book,’” she wrote.

Beyond the FBI, Blackburn is also pressing the IRS for records detailing Epstein and Maxwell’s financial dealings. She is requesting “any and all” documents revealing individuals and entities that had financial relationships with them.

FBI Director Patel’s Pledge

During his confirmation hearing last month, Patel assured Blackburn that he would “absolutely” work with her to bring more transparency to Epstein’s case files. However, it remains unclear how far he will go in releasing sensitive documents, particularly given past concerns over revealing the names of individuals who met with Epstein but were not implicated in criminal activity.

Blackburn has been a consistent advocate for obtaining these records. She previously urged the Senate Judiciary Committee to subpoena the files and pressed former FBI Director Christopher Wray on the issue. In December 2023, Wray told the Senate Judiciary Committee that his team would “figure out if there’s more information we can provide” on Epstein, but no follow-up information was ever released.

“Director Wray never provided any such follow-up information,” Blackburn noted in her letter to Patel. “Over a year has elapsed since then, and we still do not have all of the necessary information regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes.”

The demand for transparency on Epstein’s network is gaining momentum. Last week, former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi revealed that Epstein’s client list is “sitting on my desk” as it undergoes review for potential release.

As the pressure mounts, Patel and O’Donnell now face a crucial decision: whether to follow through on their promises of transparency or continue withholding key documents that could shed light on one of the most notorious criminal cases of the century. The American people, as Blackburn asserts, are watching—and waiting.

Continue Reading

Trending

Top 10 Online Casinos in Österreich