Connect with us

Biden Administration

Obama, Clinton and Biden Caught Using Fake Aliases in Emails While Coordinating “Secret Deals”

Published

on

In the year 2016, three of the most “notable” and powerful Democratic leaders corresponded by email using fictitious email addresses. This sparked concerns that former president Barack Obama, vice president at the time Joe Biden, and Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would have compromised state secrets by conversing in such an odd and unorthodox manner.

Not-for-profitObama used the alias “Obama725” in emails to Clinton, who was then the secretary of state, that Marco Polo discovered. According to a Politico piece, the State Department declined to make these and other correspondence between the two parties public. Additionally, lawyers used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to withhold the messages by citing the “presidential communications privilege”.

The news outlet’s article, however brief, stated that the email conversation took place on June 28, 2012. Its subject line, “Re: Congratulations,” may have alluded to the Supreme Court decision upholding a significant aspect of the Obamacare law that was released that same day. It has been known since last year that the two periodically corresponded via Clinton’s personal email address. The White House argued that Obama was unaware that she used it alone and consistently for official work.

It was also discovered that Joe Biden, who was vice president at the time, used the identities “Robert Peters,” “Robin Ware,” and “JRB Ware” for both personal and official purposes. The “Robert Peters” account received an email about a meeting with the prosecutor who was looking into Burisma Holdings, Viktor Shokin, who was fired by the then-president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko. The energy firm was paying Joe’s contentious son Hunter $83,000 a month to serve on the board over the same time period. According to certain intelligence assessments, the younger Biden was only hired for U.S. government protection from the “Big Guy” and “despite the fact that neither man had relevant experience or expertise for the job.”

In a public speech in January 2018, Biden boasted about the eventual firing of Shokin. By intimidating the Ukrainian government and threatening to withhold a billion-dollar loan guarantee if he didn’t get his way, he claimed that he was directly responsible for the fast firing.

And I was meant to mention that there was a new loan guarantee for $1 billion. Additionally, I had a commitment that Yatsenyuk and Poroshenko would take action against the state prosecutor. They also did not During his speech at the Council on Foreign Relations, an independent, “nonpartisan member organization” and think tank, he remarked, “I said, nah, I’m not going to or, we’re not going to give you the billion dollars.”

He claimed that because he did not have authority because he was not the president, Kyiv would initially not believe him. I advised calling him. You won’t receive the billion dollars, I assure you. I’ll be departing in a little over six hours, I believe. If the prosecution is not dismissed, you will not receive the compensation. He was let loose, son of a bitch,” he boasted.

In the meantime, Breitbart claimed that Hillary Clinton, a former first lady, lawyer, and Obama’s SoS, also used two aliases in her email correspondences. Her aliases weren’t revealed by the famed email incident and were “hdr22” and “hrod17.” She reportedly set up a private email server and network for herself, her family, and Huma Abedin, her former vice chair for the 2016 campaign, which was inaccessible to the federal authorities, notably Congress. Only the Clinton Foundation, different foreign leaders, and Doug Band’s international consulting company Teneo Holdings—where Abedin also worked during her stint at the State Department—were permitted to exchange emails with her, Abedin, and assistants Cheryl Mills and Jake Sullivan.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) initial hypothesis was that Clinton had broken the Espionage Act of 1913 by enabling sensitive national security material to be “lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed” through “gross negligence.” The private network communications have come into the possession of Julian Assange, who at the time was hiding out in an Ecuadorian embassy, as well as of investigators looking into the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal.

It was discovered that several senior Obama officials had also utilized aliases.

Lisa Jackson, a chemical engineer who oversaw the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), came in first in 2013. According to the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), which got EPA documents covering certifications in 2010, 2011, and 2012 through a FOIA request, she used the identity “Richard Windsor” to enroll in online training courses on topics including ethics, whistleblowers, and records protection. Republicans criticized Jackson’s use of the fictitious identity for her private email account and suggested that it may have been an attempt to avoid openness and public records rules. Windsor refers to her old city of East Windsor, New Jersey, while Richard is the name of her dog.

As part of an ongoing investigation into Hillary Clinton’s unsecured email server, America’s 83rd Attorney General (AG), Loretta Lynch, adopted the alias “Elizabeth Carlisle” in 2016 when she was discovered holding a covert meeting with Bill Clinton onboard a private plane on the airfield in Phoenix. After the meeting, according to Chuck Ross of the Daily Caller, the former AG coordinated a story about it with Department of Justice (DoJ) representatives under a pseudonym.

After the discussion on the plane, James Comey, the former director of the FBI, declared that the organization would not prosecute Clinton even though he acknowledged having sufficient evidence to do so. After a month, Lynch declared that, in spite of the FBI’s advice, the DOJ will not look into the Clinton Foundation’s interactions with the State Department when Hillary was Secretary of State.

2 Comments

2 Comments

  1. diklxik

    August 24, 2023 at 10:40 pm

    Geezzus Big Surprise, corruption among DEMOCRAPS ⁉️

    Keep digging it’s also there to be found no doubt on most every Republscam as well‼️

    Politicians have been given the Green Light to commit criminal actions with a pardon to not get investigated and hardly even questioned after all‼️

    While collecting a benefit’s package via the backs of hard working honest Americans tax paying dollars,

    Criminal actions that make them all rich beyond the working classes imagination!

    Trump is the Lamb that must go free to help drain this SWAMP‼️

    Awaken People ignorant no more, make some real examples starting with the Biden syndicate crime family☠️

  2. diklxik

    August 24, 2023 at 10:58 pm

    Gee☠️ criminals in politics? That’s a mistake with this country’s DOJ, & FBI watching over those up standing liars⁉️

    C’mon if people were any more ignorant everyone would be wearing helmets as mandatory safety gear rather than these stupid masks that are completely worthless

    Very much the same as the politicians we all have had to experience so many years‼️

    The real reason they Hate Trump so much is he sets the bar so high and gets things done regardless of having constant persecution !

    The rest don’t accomplish anything other than building up their own financial situations

    Trump is the Lamb that must go free, and pave the way to locking up the real criminals

    Trump 2024

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Biden Administration

U.S. Announces $725 Million Military Aid Package for Ukraine

Published

on

Washington, D.C. — The United States is poised to deliver an additional $725 million in military aid to Ukraine, signaling continued support for Kyiv’s efforts to defend against Russian aggression. The latest package, confirmed by two U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity, includes counter-drone systems and munitions for the High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).

Notably, the package raises questions about whether it includes the coveted Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), a longer-range missile that Ukraine has repeatedly requested to target deeper into Russian-controlled territory. However, the officials declined to confirm whether ATACMS would be included.

In addition to munitions, the aid package features anti-personnel landmines, which Ukraine is using to counter Russian and North Korean ground forces, particularly in contested areas like Russia’s Kursk region.

President Joe Biden remains resolute in using all funds allocated by Congress for Ukraine’s military support before the end of his administration in January. Before Monday’s announcement, approximately $7.1 billion in military assistance had been provided, drawn from Pentagon stockpiles.

While the Biden administration continues to bolster Ukraine, questions loom about the incoming Trump administration’s approach to the conflict. President-elect Trump h as promised to “end the conflict,” potentially signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward Ukraine.

In a noteworthy development, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy suggested last week that NATO membership for Ukrainian-controlled territories could help end the “hot stage of the war.” This remark signals a potential softening in Ukraine’s stance as it seeks to balance territorial integrity with international support.

HIMARS munitions have been a linchpin in Ukraine’s defense strategy, enabling precision strikes on Russian targets. The possible inclusion of ATACMS in this package could extend Ukraine’s reach, putting more strategic Russian positions at risk. Meanwhile, the addition of counter-drone systems underscores the escalating drone warfare in the region, as both sides employ drones for surveillance and strikes.

The use of anti-personnel landmines reflects Ukraine’s tactical efforts to slow Russian advancements, particularly in areas where conventional defense lines have proven difficult to maintain.

The aid announcement comes amid heightened speculation about U.S. foreign policy under the incoming Trump administration. While President Biden has championed robust support for Ukraine, critics argue the ongoing assistance risks overextending U.S. resources. Trump’s pledge to “end the conflict” could signify a more isolationist approach, raising concerns among Ukraine’s allies about the continuity of U.S. support.

As the war grinds on, Ukraine remains reliant on Western military aid to sustain its defenses and reclaim lost territory. The latest U.S. package underscores Washington’s strategic commitment, even as domestic and international pressures mount.

Whether the new administration will maintain this trajectory remains uncertain, but for now, the U.S. remains a steadfast partner in Ukraine’s fight for sovereignty.

SOURCE: ASSOCIATED PRESS

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

U.S. Government Has Sent $239 Million to Taliban Since 2021 Due to State Dept’s Vetting Failures, Report Reveals

Published

on

The U.S. government has inadvertently sent at least $239 million to the Taliban in development assistance since 2021, according to a new report. The oversight occurred because the State Department failed to properly vet award recipients.

Less than a year after it was reported that the Taliban established fake nonprofits to siphon millions of dollars in U.S. aid to Afghanistan, a new investigation by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) reveals that the terrorist group has received hundreds of millions in development assistance due to inadequate vetting by the State Department. Since the 2021 U.S. military withdrawal, at least $239 million have likely filled the Taliban’s coffers.

The State Department’s divisions known as Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (DRL) and International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) disbursed the funds to implement development projects aimed at supporting American foreign policy and national security goals in Afghanistan.

Investigators found that the State Department failed to comply with its own counterterrorism partner vetting requirements before awarding at least 29 grants to various local entities. The agency has a system in place to identify whether prospective awardees have a record of ethical business practices and is supposed to conduct risk assessments to determine if programming funds may benefit terrorists or terrorist-affiliates before distributing American taxpayer dollars. However, in the more than two dozen cases examined, the agency neglected these procedures and failed to maintain proper records.

“Because DRL and INL could not demonstrate their compliance with State’s partner vetting requirements, there is an increased risk that terrorist and terrorist-affiliated individuals and entities may have illegally benefited from State spending in Afghanistan,” the SIGAR report states. “As State continues to spend U.S. taxpayer funds on programs intended to benefit the Afghan people, it is critical that State knows who is actually benefiting from this assistance in order to prevent the aid from being diverted to the Taliban or other sanctioned parties, and to enable policymakers and other oversight authorities to better scrutinize the risks posed by State’s spending.”

The watchdog identified issues with 29 awards distributed by DRL and INL. For instance, DRL failed to properly screen the recipients of seven awards totaling about $12 million. INL did not provide any supporting documentation for 19 of its 22 awards totaling about $295 million, making it impossible to determine if they complied with vetting requirements. The State Department acknowledged that not all its bureaus have complied with document retention requirements, complicating the assessment of the magnitude of its transgressions. INL cited “employee turnover and the dissolution of the Afghanistan-Pakistan office” as reasons for not retaining records.

Given the Taliban’s takeover of Afghanistan in August 2021, SIGAR emphasized the importance of U.S. government activities adhering to laws, regulations, and policies intended to prevent transactions with terrorists.

Besides establishing fraudulent non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to loot significant portions of the $3 billion in humanitarian aid the U.S. has provided Afghanistan since the Biden administration’s abrupt military withdrawal, the Taliban has also accrued millions by charging taxes, permit fees, and import duties. This money has flowed through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), a State Department arm known for its corruption, which received $63.1 billion for foreign assistance and diplomatic engagement this year. Additionally, the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), the government’s international broadcasting service, also disbursed funds.

The United Nations has received $1.6 billion in U.S. funding for Afghanistan, and a significant percentage of that money likely went to the Taliban, according to a federal audit. The U.S. government does not require the UN to report on taxes, fees, or duties incurred on American funds for activities in Afghanistan, further complicating accountability.

SOURCE: SIGAR REPORT

Continue Reading

Biden Administration

US Announces $1.7 Billion in New Security Assistance for Ukraine

Published

on

The United States announced on Monday a new tranche of military aid for Ukraine valued at approximately $1.7 billion. This package includes critical air defense munitions and artillery rounds that Ukrainian forces have urgently requested.

The assistance package comprises $200 million in equipment drawn from existing U.S. military stocks, ensuring rapid deployment to the battlefield. Additionally, it includes around $1.5 billion in new orders, which will take longer to reach Ukraine, according to a statement from the Defense Department.

Key Components of the Aid Package

The new security assistance will provide Ukraine with:

  • Various types of air defense munitions to shield against Russian strikes
  • Artillery rounds
  • Ammunition for HIMARS precision rocket launchers
  • Multiple types of anti-tank weapons
  • Other crucial capabilities

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed deep gratitude in a social media post, thanking U.S. President Joe Biden, the U.S. Congress, and the American people for their continued support. Zelensky emphasized that the aid includes items “critical to strengthening Ukrainian defenders, as well as funding to sustain previously committed equipment from the United States.”

Zelensky visited special forces in the border region of Kharkiv on Monday. Moscow’s forces launched a surprise ground offensive in this region in May but failed to make significant progress. The Ukrainian leader observed firsthand how the ongoing assistance from the U.S. helps to save lives and protect citizens from Russian attacks.

The United States has been a pivotal military supporter of Ukraine, committing over $55 billion in weapons, ammunition, and other security assistance since Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.

Before late April, Washington had announced limited new aid for Ukraine this year, with only a $300 million package made possible through Pentagon savings on other purchases. After months of intense debate, Congress finally approved large-scale funding for Kyiv in April, authorizing $95 billion in aid, including $61 billion specifically for Ukraine.

Despite the new aid, Ukrainian forces are facing significant challenges. On Monday, Russia claimed its forces had captured the village of Vovche in eastern Ukraine, marking the latest in a series of front-line advances by Moscow.

The Ukrainian military reported that it had repelled six Russian attacks on the Kharkiv front line over the past day, including at Vovchansk, a small town that Russian forces have targeted since May. As the conflict grinds through its third year, neither side has managed to gain a decisive advantage, although Moscow’s forces have made recent gains.

Continue Reading

Trending