On May 10, 2021, the FDA authorized the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in children 12 years of age and older in the USA. Following suit, the EMA has suggested that youngsters in the EU who are 12 years old and older receive the Pfizer vaccine.
Because of this, there is no reason to have any doubt that the MHRA will follow the FDA’s and EMA’s lead and likewise give the Pfizer vaccine emergency use authorization for use in children 12 years of age and older.
But did you know that according to Pfizer’s clinical trials on kids between the ages of 12 and 15, 86% of those who received at least one dose of the vaccine experienced mild to severe side effects?
On May 10, 2021, the FDA authorized the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine for use in children 12 years of age and older in the USA. Following suit, the EMA has suggested that youngsters in the EU who are 12 years old and older receive the Pfizer vaccine.
Because of this, there is no reason to have any doubt that the MHRA will follow the FDA’s and EMA’s lead and likewise give the Pfizer vaccine emergency use authorization for use in children 12 years of age and older.
But did you know that according to Pfizer’s clinical trials on kids between the ages of 12 and 15, 86% of those who received at least one dose of the vaccine experienced mild to severe side effects?
The information is publicly available and contained within an FDA fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).
Two tables in that data sheet provide worrisome information about the side effects and damage suffered by 12- to 15-year-old kids who had at least one dosage of the Pfizer mRNA “vaccine” (gene therapy).
Only 1,097 of the 1,127 children who received the first dosage of the mRNA vaccine also received the second dose, according to the tables. This fact alone begs the issue of why 30 kids did not receive a second dosage of the Pfizer vaccine, and we have our doubts about the answer’s aesthetics.
A startling 86% of the 1,127 kids who received the vaccine for the first time had a negative reaction. A startling 78.9% of the 1,097 kids who received a second dosage of the vaccine had an unfavorable reaction.
20.3% of the 1,127 children who received the Pfizer vaccine’s first dose and 39.3% of the 1,097 children who received it twice both reported fever, according to Table 6 in the FDA fact sheet.
Sixty-six percent of the kids who received the second dose also felt fatigued, compared to another 60.1% of the kids who received the first dose.
A headache was also experienced by an additional 55.3% of the kids who received the first dose and 64.5% of the kids who got the second dose.
Chills were also experienced by 27.6% of the children who received the first dose, and by 41.5% of the children who received the second dose. Vomiting occurred in 2.8% of the children who received the first dose and 2.6% of the children who received the second dose.
Diarrhea is the FDA’s final specified adverse reaction. 8.0% of the 1,127 kids who got the first dosage experienced diarrhea. 5.9% of the 1,097 kids who received a second dosage of the medication developed diarrhea.
It’s alarming to see that the trial was permitted to continue and that the same kids received a second dosage of the vaccine despite the fact that 86% of them had reported an adverse reaction after the first dose.
The FDA report also mentions that 0.04% experienced an extremely serious adverse event, but it doesn’t elaborate on the specific types of reactions that took place. 0.04% might seem insignificant, but let’s put it in context. There are roughly 4 million kids in the UK between the ages of 12 and 15 years old. According to the study, 1,600 children might experience a very serious adverse reaction after receiving just one dosage of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine which could also include death.
We should expect to see that number rise to about 5,200 if this is subsequently extended to children under the age of 12 and a similar rate of extremely serious adverse reactions happens.
However, it is important to remember that the study found that 86% of recipients experienced a negative reaction. This indicates that 3.4 million children aged 12 to 15 who receive just one dose of the Pfizer vaccine are likely to experience a negative reaction.
We are perplexed by how medical regulators came to the conclusion that the advantages of these experimental vaccines exceed the risks when we contrast this rate with the actual risk of children even mildly exhibiting the purported Covid-19 sickness.
And these are experimental vaccines, the FDA document even tells the public this in which it states the following –
‘The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine is an unapproved vaccine that may prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19. The FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 in individuals 12 years of age and older under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).‘
Additionally, the FDA affirms in its fact sheet that all Covid vaccines, including the Pfizer vaccine, are still undergoing clinical studies.
There could be serious and unexpected negative effects.
This link (https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download) in your article goes to an FDA page that says it doesn’t exist or is out of date? What did the page look like before they made it ‘out of date’?
Thanks,
Buddy
Clearly you live in a warped reality if you drew the above conclusions from the data provided. Instead of stupidly highlighting the 3% who didn’t get a 2nd vaccine, maybe focus on the overwhelming 97% of parents who were happy to give their child a 2nd dose. Clearly the ‘adverse’ effects you are trying to scaremonger people about were nothing for those 97% to worry about. It’s also funny how you made zero reference to all the ‘adverse’ reactions from a placebo. With such a high number of ‘fatigue’ side effects reported by kids from a basic placebo, the vaccine responses relating to fatigue (the highest side effect) is clearly unreliable. The only news story here is about parents trying to do the right thing and protect their kids from Covid. Just more fake news from a dimwit author trying to push a dangerous agenda.
In a disturbing twist to last week’s targeted violence against Minnesota officials, sources reveal that a conspiratorial letter left behind by shooting suspect Vance Boelter accuses Governor Tim Walz of orchestrating a political assassination plot. The letter, addressed to the FBI, allegedly claims Walz instructed Boelter to kill U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar so that Walz could seek her Senate seat—a position he has not expressed any intent to pursue.
Two individuals with direct knowledge of the letter described it as incoherent, one and a half pages long, and filled with paranoid ramblings. The letter allegedly outlines unsubstantiated claims that Boelter was trained “off the books” by the U.S. military, and that Walz had enlisted him to assassinate Klobuchar and potentially other politicians, including a veiled reference to Sen. Tina Smith.
Federal prosecutors say Boelter left the letter in a Buick abandoned near his home in Green Isle, Minnesota. It is believed to include a confession to the killings of Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, as well as the shootings of Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette.
Boelter, 57, now faces federal charges including:
Two counts of stalking Rep. Hortman and Sen. Hoffman using interstate facilities;
Two counts of murder in the deaths of the Hortmans;
Two counts of firearm use in the shootings of the Hortmans and Hoffmans.
While federal authorities declined to comment on the letter’s contents, local officials addressed the severity of the situation. Hennepin County Attorney’s Office spokesperson Daniel Borgertpoepping stated they could not comment on an open investigation, but added, “We have seen no evidence that the allegations regarding Governor Walz are based in fact.”
Gov. Walz’s spokesman, Teddy Tschann, called the events “deeply disturbing for all Minnesotans” and praised law enforcement and prosecutors for their swift actions.
Sen. Klobuchar issued a strong response, saying, “Boelter is a very dangerous man and I am deeply grateful that law enforcement got him behind bars before he killed other people.”
Documents obtained by the Minnesota Star Tribune also reveal that Boelter held a valid carry license as recently as 2020, issued while he was still affiliated with his family’s private security firm.
With more details likely to surface as the investigation unfolds, the letter marks a chilling insight into Boelter’s delusions—and highlights the growing threats facing public officials.
A new study from the MIT Media Lab has raised concerns about the long-term effects of using artificial intelligence tools like ChatGPT on human cognition. The research, released this month, suggests that relying on large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT could impair an individual’s critical thinking abilities, especially with prolonged use.
Researchers observed participants over several months as they completed SAT-style essay assignments. The subjects were divided into three groups: one using ChatGPT, another using Google’s search engine, and a third group relying solely on their own thinking—dubbed the “brain-only” group.
To analyze brain activity during the writing tasks, researchers used electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor neural engagement across different regions of the brain. The results showed a stark difference in cognitive involvement among the groups.
According to the study, those using ChatGPT demonstrated the lowest level of brain engagement. Over time, these participants began to rely more heavily on the AI, eventually moving from asking structural questions to simply copying and pasting complete essays. The researchers noted that this group “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.”
Participants who used Google showed moderate brain activity, while the “brain-only” group displayed the strongest and most widespread neural activity, indicating deeper cognitive involvement throughout the writing process.
The study’s lead author, Nataliya Kosmyna, emphasized the urgency of the findings, particularly as AI tools become more integrated into education.
“What really motivated me to put it out now before waiting for a full peer review is that I am afraid in 6–8 months, there will be some policymaker who decides, ‘let’s do GPT kindergarten.’ I think that would be absolutely bad and detrimental,” Kosmyna told Time
magazine. “Developing brains are at the highest risk.”
The study highlights growing concerns among educators about how easily accessible AI tools are enabling academic dishonesty and changing how students learn. Despite these concerns, AI integration in classrooms appears to be accelerating.
In April, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order promoting the use of AI in American schools. The policy aims to prepare young students for a future economy shaped by AI advancements.
“The basic idea of this executive order is to ensure that we properly train the workforce of the future by ensuring that school children, young Americans, are adequately trained in AI tools, so that they can be competitive in the economy years from now into the future, as AI becomes a bigger and bigger deal,” White House staff secretary Will Scharf said at the time.
As the debate over AI’s role in education continues, this new research may fuel broader discussions on how to balance technological innovation with cognitive development—especially for younger generations.
SACRAMENTO, CA — Former Los Angeles Mayor and current California gubernatorial candidate Antonio Villaraigosa has publicly alleged that Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra were involved in concealing former President Joe Biden’s mental and physical decline during his time in office.
Villaraigosa, a Democrat, made the claim amid a heated California gubernatorial race. Becerra, the former Secretary of Health and Human Services, is also a candidate, while speculation continues over a potential Harris bid. The race comes as current Governor Gavin Newsom reaches the end of his second and final term, per California’s two-term limit.
In a statement referencing recent reporting and excerpts from the book Original Sin, Villaraigosa stated:
“What I’ve seen in news coverage and excerpts from the new book ‘Original Sin’ is deeply troubling. At the highest levels of our government, those in power were intentionally complicit or told outright lies in a systematic cover up to keep Joe Biden’s mental decline from the public.”
Both Harris and Becerra previously served as California Attorney General. Villaraigosa emphasized their past leadership roles, stating:
“Now, we have come to learn this cover up includes two prominent California politicians who served as California Attorney General – one who is running for Governor and another who is thinking about running for Governor.”
He added:
“Those who were complicit in the cover up should take responsibility for the part they played in this debacle, hold themselves accountable, and apologize to the American people. I call on Kamala Harris and Xavier Becerra to do just that – and make themselves available to voters and the free press because there’s a lot of questions that need to be answered.”
Becerra responded in a statement, saying:
“It’s clear the President was getting older, but he made the mission clear: run the largest health agency in the world, expand care to millions more Americans than ever before, negotiate down the cost of prescription drugs, and pull us out of a world-wide pandemic. And we delivered.”
Kamala Harris has not issued a public response. Fox News Digital reported that it reached out to the offices of Harris and the Bidens but had not received a reply at the time of publication.
The allegations come as discussions about Biden’s cognitive and physical health continue. Earlier this month, during an appearance on The View, Biden dismissed claims of cognitive decline during his presidency.
In related developments, Biden’s personal office recently confirmed that he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer characterized by a high Gleason score and metastasis to the bone.
Villaraigosa’s comments are the latest in a growing list of concerns raised within the Democratic Party about leadership transparency and accountability in the final years of the Biden administration.
Buddy Broerman
July 16, 2023 at 12:29 am
This link (https://www.fda.gov/media/144413/download) in your article goes to an FDA page that says it doesn’t exist or is out of date? What did the page look like before they made it ‘out of date’?
Thanks,
Buddy
Pingback: 86% of Children Suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid Vaccine in Clinical Trial - Dr. Rich Swier
James
July 21, 2023 at 9:52 pm
Clearly you live in a warped reality if you drew the above conclusions from the data provided. Instead of stupidly highlighting the 3% who didn’t get a 2nd vaccine, maybe focus on the overwhelming 97% of parents who were happy to give their child a 2nd dose. Clearly the ‘adverse’ effects you are trying to scaremonger people about were nothing for those 97% to worry about. It’s also funny how you made zero reference to all the ‘adverse’ reactions from a placebo. With such a high number of ‘fatigue’ side effects reported by kids from a basic placebo, the vaccine responses relating to fatigue (the highest side effect) is clearly unreliable. The only news story here is about parents trying to do the right thing and protect their kids from Covid. Just more fake news from a dimwit author trying to push a dangerous agenda.